Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 34 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
211
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 16:29:00 -
[781] - Quote
duh huh huh huh you had to look it up at urban dictionary
Mr Epeen wrote:Taiwanistan wrote:wis: a cesspool of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, bunch of dudes emoting each other, all the evolving new and exciting things you've ever wanted. The irony of that statement coming from a member of an alliance of which fully half is basement dwelling neckbeards and butt pirates roleplaying women is not lost on most people. Mr Epeen seems like you like swimming in that cesspool, remember to come up for air. wis: a cesspool of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, bunch of dudes emoting each other, all the evolving new and exciting things you've ever wanted. |
Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
211
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 16:35:00 -
[782] - Quote
Eben Harper wrote:I am a carebear, I am part of the majority, and I support Issler Dainze. | V wis: a cesspool of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, bunch of dudes emoting each other, all the evolving new and exciting things you've ever wanted. |
Blatant Forum Alt
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 16:39:00 -
[783] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Weaselior wrote:if you lost to darius III you didn't run a strong campaign soz Urban Dictionary wrote:soz
Nonsensical internet slang term for "sorry", used by illiterate morons who for some reason substitute a GÇ£zGÇ¥ for GÇ£rryGÇ¥, the latter of which would take an entire quarter of a second to type out.
Urban Dictionary wrote: Epeen
(noun) short for "Electronic ***** ENlargement". Behavior quite commonly found on online discussion boards or similar, where some loser tries to establish his superiority - and thus the merit of his or her opinion - by stating how skilled and awesome he or she is, rather than forming a sound argument. |
Frying Doom
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 16:39:00 -
[784] - Quote
Speaking of cesspools. I love the spin by The Mittani that everything good that has happened while CSM6 has been in office is his doing, yet not the bad things that have happened, Incarna being one of them. I'm not saying he is in anyway responsible for Incarna, but then I'm not saying he is responsible for all the good things that have occurred either. Vote Issler Dainze for CSM7! http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=470
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge. |
Avila Cracko
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
170
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 17:00:00 -
[785] - Quote
My vote goes to miners friend. |
Frying Doom
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
19
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 17:02:00 -
[786] - Quote
Avila Cracko wrote:My vote goes to miners friend. Thank You Vote Issler Dainze for CSM7! http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=470
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge. |
Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
126
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 17:34:00 -
[787] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:While I wish you the best of luck on your platform how are you planning to actually engage the people you consider your constituents? The majority of "carebears" in Eve Online don't actually play Eve Online. They go out of their way to find ways to minimize the time they spend in the client while their wallets blink. Most of these folks don't even know the CSM even exists let alone what issues there are. How have I rated so much goon attention!? I'm just a miner that had some friends, that loved Eve, and we mine. A lot! We created a corp, then an alliance on the crazy concept of never being bump optimal. Bum optimal is anything better for the leaders than the members. Kind of sounds like a very prominent alliance in Eve. Is it better to the mittens than a bee? Yes I bet.! So I want Eve to be better! Starting with the miners! My Sci Fi movie model is Firefly! We are the mudders!! And I toast you all with a mudders milk!! Miners Unite! Issler Dainze Eight years in the belt! Committed to the idea the leaders serve the members!! The MIner's Friend! CSM 7 Candidate!
You still didn't answer my question. Leave side stepping hard questions to The Mittani, he's far more adept at it. So the question still stands. |
Snowflake Tem
The Order of Symbolic Measures
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 17:54:00 -
[788] - Quote
I don't know about hearing the bears roar - it's more like a mewling meep. Industrialists and marketeers have no teeth becaus e they have no control of their product once it is put on the markets. they can not choose who to sell to. If they had a blacklist option in thier sell orders you'd see some real weeping and gnashing of teeth going on. but it would probably break the markets so, you know, we meep.
|
Snowflake Tem
The Order of Symbolic Measures
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 18:00:00 -
[789] - Quote
if you really want to hurt the nullsec alliances you'll keep your products off the open market and sell via contract internally. which hurts you just as much as them 'cos your not getting the revenue you are used to. it's all part of the game. find and balance and prevail. |
Eben Harper
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 00:18:00 -
[790] - Quote
Avila Cracko wrote:My vote goes to miners friend. Thank you cadet o7
Snowflake Tem wrote:Industrialists and marketeers have no teeth becaus e they have no control of their product once it is put on the markets. they can not choose who to sell to. If they had a blacklist option in thier sell orders you'd see some real weeping and gnashing of teeth going on. I don't think the Amarrian mother of my half brother could have put it better. Industrialists should have the right to know who they are selling to and refuse service, even on the open market (GOON EMBARGO).
|
|
Eben Harper
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 00:34:00 -
[791] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:The majority of "carebears" in Eve Online don't actually play Eve Online. They go out of their way to find ways to minimize the time they spend in the client while their wallets blink. Most of these folks don't even know the CSM even exists let alone what issues there are. Be that as it may as paying customers shouldn't they receive representation just as any other paying customer? In my opinion one of the greatest appeals of EvE Online is that it's such a massive and open universe anyone can pay a monthly fee and play it AS THEY SEE FIT, which is why it annoys me when certain nullseccers and pvpers claim someone doesn't even matter because they don't play EvE Online a particular way. Who is anyone to say how anyone else should spend their $15 to play this game?
I am a carebear, I am part of the majority, and I support Issler Dainze. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
235
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 01:15:00 -
[792] - Quote
Eben Harper wrote:Avila Cracko wrote:My vote goes to miners friend. Thank you cadet o7 Snowflake Tem wrote:Industrialists and marketeers have no teeth becaus e they have no control of their product once it is put on the markets. they can not choose who to sell to. If they had a blacklist option in thier sell orders you'd see some real weeping and gnashing of teeth going on. I don't think the Amarrian mother of my half brother could have put it better. Industrialists should have the right to know who they are selling to and refuse service, even on the open market (GOON EMBARGO). Yes, because no one would just sell it to us anyway, as the margins for flipping cheap embargo goods into "for nullsec" contracts would never tempt anyone ever.
If highsec corps can get themselves cleaned out (except for the Miitani's regards), you'd imagine some alt characters trained for mining/industry would be able to flip a bunch of contracts. But no, clearly not, we'd just choke to death as the endless titans of
wait. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |
Snowflake Tem
The Order of Symbolic Measures
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 11:50:00 -
[793] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Eben Harper wrote:Avila Cracko wrote:My vote goes to miners friend. Thank you cadet o7 Snowflake Tem wrote:Industrialists and marketeers have no teeth becaus e they have no control of their product once it is put on the markets. they can not choose who to sell to. If they had a blacklist option in thier sell orders you'd see some real weeping and gnashing of teeth going on. I don't think the Amarrian mother of my half brother could have put it better. Industrialists should have the right to know who they are selling to and refuse service, even on the open market (GOON EMBARGO). Yes, because no one would just sell it to us anyway, as the margins for flipping cheap embargo goods into "for nullsec" contracts would never tempt anyone ever. If highsec corps can get themselves cleaned out (except for the Miitani's regards), you'd imagine some alt characters trained for mining/industry would be able to flip a bunch of contracts. But no, clearly not, we'd just choke to death as the endless titans of wait.
RP is just empty threats and posturing behind borrowed ideals.
The Ice Interdiction was not nearly as effective as people would like to believe. No one uses Gallente Towers seriously, and it did not have significant impact on jump fuel either. you guys need a foe worthy of you, i don't see any here.
sure goons have stockpiles in place and alt corps to ensure supplys from highsec, not one thinks you don't.
but if hissy Issler wants to unite the "bears" as one voice she needs to get serious about taking out the competition to her alliance and impose said trade restrictions. I'll give her credit for using honey rather than the sitng to heard her hippies but at some point she would be wise to fund the merc corps that are suffering at the mo with a few select contracts.
Highsec is a mess. you goons did not even dint my competition in fighting my wars for me. Savvys know when to ditch a product and move on to something else and leave the suffering to the bots in mind and substance.
|
Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
937
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 18:25:00 -
[794] - Quote
Avila Cracko wrote:My vote goes to miners friend.
That's the spirit Vote Issler Dainze for CSM7! http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=470-á |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
236
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 00:23:00 -
[795] - Quote
Snowflake Tem wrote: Savvys know when to ditch a product and move on to something else and leave the suffering to the bots in mind and substance. well said.
Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |
Trini Soren
The Actinic Agency
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 06:22:00 -
[796] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:
Miners Industrialists Traders Small Corps Independent players High Sec PvE Casual Players Ambulation
Happy miners mean cheap ore. I'm an industrialist (mostly building Tornados for our gank friends right now) Happy traders means competition/ lower prices. I'm a small corp. Independent players are the backbone of Eve. High sec PvE could use a boost I guess. Casual players are just as important as the rest of the playerbase. Ambulation would give me something to do as I rarely undock.
You hit all the right buttons for me and you have my vote. |
Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
168
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 08:35:00 -
[797] - Quote
I really hope that you get a CSM chair Issler. We must give a chance to every part of EVE. |
Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
556
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 08:44:00 -
[798] - Quote
Snowflake Tem wrote: The Ice Interdiction was not nearly as effective as people would like to believe. No one uses Gallente Towers seriously, and it did not have significant impact on jump fuel either. you guys need a foe worthy of you, i don't see any here.
Umm, as both a thanatos carrier pilot and someone who helps design poses from time to time, both of these things are untrue. Gallente towers WERE used seriously for moonmining, the silo bonus is ****, and oxytopes more than doubled in price, from around 700isk/unit. Highest I paid during the rush was 2k per unit, which it held at for a couple weeks(glad I live 3 jumps from a blue ice belt in nullsec). Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |
Snowflake Tem
The Order of Symbolic Measures
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 09:52:00 -
[799] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:[quote=Snowflake Tem] Umm, as both a thanatos carrier pilot and someone who helps design poses from time to time, both of these things are untrue. Gallente towers WERE used seriously for moonmining, the silo bonus is ****, and oxytopes more than doubled in price, from around 700isk/unit. Highest I paid during the rush was 2k per unit, which it held at for a couple weeks(glad I live 3 jumps from a blue ice belt in nullsec).
okay, I guess i showed my ignorance of moon mining there - but I believe the price hike was down to marketeers taking advantage of the excuse not to put their reserves on the market.
|
Snowflake Tem
The Order of Symbolic Measures
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 10:03:00 -
[800] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:[quote=Snowflake Tem] Umm, as both a thanatos carrier pilot and someone who helps design poses from time to time, both of these things are untrue. Gallente towers WERE used seriously for moonmining, the silo bonus is ****, and oxytopes more than doubled in price, from around 700isk/unit. Highest I paid during the rush was 2k per unit, which it held at for a couple weeks(glad I live 3 jumps from a blue ice belt in nullsec).
okay, I guess i showed my ignorance of moon mining there - but I believe the price hike was down to marketeers taking advantage of the excuse not to put their reserves on the open market. This is why selling internally within an alliance is vital and why Jade Cougar is positioning to make himself an industrial powerhouse.
|
|
Kai Tel
State War Academy Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 10:06:00 -
[801] - Quote
Snowflake Tem wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:[quote=Snowflake Tem] Umm, as both a thanatos carrier pilot and someone who helps design poses from time to time, both of these things are untrue. Gallente towers WERE used seriously for moonmining, the silo bonus is ****, and oxytopes more than doubled in price, from around 700isk/unit. Highest I paid during the rush was 2k per unit, which it held at for a couple weeks(glad I live 3 jumps from a blue ice belt in nullsec). okay, I guess i showed my ignorance of moon mining there - but I believe the price hike was down to marketeers taking advantage of the excuse not to put their reserves on the market.
Doesn't matter. Your campaign for next year's elections is off to a good start Snowflake. I'll be watching. |
Snowflake Tem
The Order of Symbolic Measures
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 12:21:00 -
[802] - Quote
Kai Tel wrote:
Doesn't matter. Your campaign for next year's elections is off to a good start Snowflake. I'll be watching.
I can only speak for my interests and could not in good conscious sign an NDA, because investing in what I think is coming next is a huge part of what I enjoy in this game. That is why good listeners are hugely valuable on the CSM. |
Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
214
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 13:57:00 -
[803] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:I really hope that you get a CSM chair Issler. We must give a chance to every part of EVE. just say it, you love emoting wis: a cesspool of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, bunch of dudes emoting each other, all the evolving new and exciting things you've ever wanted. |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1257
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 19:06:00 -
[804] - Quote
So there still is time to spread the word! For the miners of Eve to get a voice in the CSM they need to spread the word out in the 'verse! Miners mine out in space, in the belts, not in the forums!
So tell a friend to vote, get that friend to tell another friend. They say we can't come together when we need to, I say we can!
Miners Unite!
Miners Rock!
Miners can Rock the Vote!
Miners can be part of the CSM 7!
Vote Today!
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2835
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 19:41:00 -
[805] - Quote
i say you can't
betcha i win |
Barnabas O'Malley
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 22:36:00 -
[806] - Quote
This CSM convinced CCP to address the massive botting in the drone regions which has crashed mineral prices. They've done a very good job representing miner interests. I explained this to you in direct answer to your question in this thread. So I'll say it again. I was a highsec hulk pilot a few years ago because it was a way to make descent isk/hour while doing other RL stuff. The market crashed so hard because of botting that it stopped being viable even in an afk capacity. This CSM understood that and acted.
I'm a member of the demographic you keep addressing with talking points like "miners unite" and I'm telling you that it in no way represents us or our interests. I support Mittens and a lot of the other block candidates because they really do understand highsec industry better than you.
You went back to the same meaningless rhetoric after literally posting a thread a few days ago asking for reasons why non-block voters back block candidates. You were answered by myself and others. Furthermore, a lot of the goons were actually asking you questions and giving you feedback which could have strengthened your campaign. Some of the most gentle trolling I've ever seen the goons do was in this thread. Enough with these talking points and haughty anti-nullsec sentiment. |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1258
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 22:51:00 -
[807] - Quote
Barnabas O'Malley wrote:This CSM convinced CCP to address the massive botting in the drone regions which has crashed mineral prices. They've done a very good job representing miner interests. I explained this to you in direct answer to your question in this thread. So I'll say it again. I was a highsec hulk pilot a few years ago because it was a way to make descent isk/hour while doing other RL stuff. The market crashed so hard because of botting that it stopped being viable even in an afk capacity. This CSM understood that and acted. I'm a member of the demographic you keep addressing with talking points like "miners unite" and I'm telling you that it in no way represents us or our interests. I support Mittens and a lot of the other block candidates because they really do understand highsec industry better than you. You went back to the same meaningless rhetoric after literally posting a thread a few days ago asking for reasons why non-block voters back block candidates. You were answered by myself and others. Furthermore, a lot of the goons were actually asking you questions and giving you feedback which could have strengthened your campaign. Some of the most gentle trolling I've ever seen the goons do was in this thread. Enough with these talking points and haughty anti-nullsec sentiment.
A hulk owner that supports the folks that like to explode his hulk for giggles that says I don't understand high sec miners.
Mining is more than isks/hour. It can be made much better in terms of fun per hour. No one in the CSM 6 did anything to expand the mining experience. And to claim that CSM 6 somehow get more interest on the part of CCP to counter botting is simply insane.
NO high sec miner can really support Mittens unless they like the experience of being in their barges while the are exploded by griefers.
I am not anti-null, I am anti-null exclusive focus, all of Eve needs to have balanced attention from CCP. That hasn't been the case for some time.
But thanks for posting, I enjoy the goon and goon alt bumps.
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate
|
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
169
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 23:01:00 -
[808] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Barnabas O'Malley wrote:This CSM convinced CCP to address the massive botting in the drone regions which has crashed mineral prices. They've done a very good job representing miner interests. I explained this to you in direct answer to your question in this thread. So I'll say it again. I was a highsec hulk pilot a few years ago because it was a way to make descent isk/hour while doing other RL stuff. The market crashed so hard because of botting that it stopped being viable even in an afk capacity. This CSM understood that and acted. I'm a member of the demographic you keep addressing with talking points like "miners unite" and I'm telling you that it in no way represents us or our interests. I support Mittens and a lot of the other block candidates because they really do understand highsec industry better than you. You went back to the same meaningless rhetoric after literally posting a thread a few days ago asking for reasons why non-block voters back block candidates. You were answered by myself and others. Furthermore, a lot of the goons were actually asking you questions and giving you feedback which could have strengthened your campaign. Some of the most gentle trolling I've ever seen the goons do was in this thread. Enough with these talking points and haughty anti-nullsec sentiment. A hulk owner that supports the folks that like to explode his hulk for giggles that says I don't understand high sec miners. Mining is more than isks/hour. It can be made much better in terms of fun per hour. No one in the CSM 6 did anything to expand the mining experience. And to claim that CSM 6 somehow get more interest on the part of CCP to counter botting is simply insane. NO high sec miner can really support Mittens unless they like the experience of being in their barges while the are exploded by griefers. I am not anti-null, I am anti-null exclusive focus, all of Eve needs to have balanced attention from CCP. That hasn't been the case for some time. But thanks for posting, I enjoy the goon and goon alt bumps. Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate
tl;dr - ignore opinion of demographic I'm trying to get support from, make broad assumptions that people think the same way I do and if they don't they are dumb, call fellow miner a goon alt.
I don't know why Goons bother to troll you when you wreck your campaign yourself! (Oh right, because it is hilarious.)
Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7 |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1259
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 23:16:00 -
[809] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Barnabas O'Malley wrote:This CSM convinced CCP to address the massive botting in the drone regions which has crashed mineral prices. They've done a very good job representing miner interests. I explained this to you in direct answer to your question in this thread. So I'll say it again. I was a highsec hulk pilot a few years ago because it was a way to make descent isk/hour while doing other RL stuff. The market crashed so hard because of botting that it stopped being viable even in an afk capacity. This CSM understood that and acted. I'm a member of the demographic you keep addressing with talking points like "miners unite" and I'm telling you that it in no way represents us or our interests. I support Mittens and a lot of the other block candidates because they really do understand highsec industry better than you. You went back to the same meaningless rhetoric after literally posting a thread a few days ago asking for reasons why non-block voters back block candidates. You were answered by myself and others. Furthermore, a lot of the goons were actually asking you questions and giving you feedback which could have strengthened your campaign. Some of the most gentle trolling I've ever seen the goons do was in this thread. Enough with these talking points and haughty anti-nullsec sentiment. A hulk owner that supports the folks that like to explode his hulk for giggles that says I don't understand high sec miners. Mining is more than isks/hour. It can be made much better in terms of fun per hour. No one in the CSM 6 did anything to expand the mining experience. And to claim that CSM 6 somehow get more interest on the part of CCP to counter botting is simply insane. NO high sec miner can really support Mittens unless they like the experience of being in their barges while the are exploded by griefers. I am not anti-null, I am anti-null exclusive focus, all of Eve needs to have balanced attention from CCP. That hasn't been the case for some time. But thanks for posting, I enjoy the goon and goon alt bumps. Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate tl;dr - ignore opinion of demographic I'm trying to get support from, make broad assumptions that people think the same way I do and if they don't they are dumb, call fellow miner a goon alt. I don't know why Goons bother to troll you when you wreck your campaign yourself! (Oh right, because it is hilarious.)
My demographic is not represented by the quoted poster, that is my point. My demographic most definitely are not supporters of the folks that enjoy ganking them while they mine in their barges.
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
1259
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 23:18:00 -
[810] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Barnabas O'Malley wrote:This CSM convinced CCP to address the massive botting in the drone regions which has crashed mineral prices. They've done a very good job representing miner interests. I explained this to you in direct answer to your question in this thread. So I'll say it again. I was a highsec hulk pilot a few years ago because it was a way to make descent isk/hour while doing other RL stuff. The market crashed so hard because of botting that it stopped being viable even in an afk capacity. This CSM understood that and acted. I'm a member of the demographic you keep addressing with talking points like "miners unite" and I'm telling you that it in no way represents us or our interests. I support Mittens and a lot of the other block candidates because they really do understand highsec industry better than you. You went back to the same meaningless rhetoric after literally posting a thread a few days ago asking for reasons why non-block voters back block candidates. You were answered by myself and others. Furthermore, a lot of the goons were actually asking you questions and giving you feedback which could have strengthened your campaign. Some of the most gentle trolling I've ever seen the goons do was in this thread. Enough with these talking points and haughty anti-nullsec sentiment. A hulk owner that supports the folks that like to explode his hulk for giggles that says I don't understand high sec miners. Mining is more than isks/hour. It can be made much better in terms of fun per hour. No one in the CSM 6 did anything to expand the mining experience. And to claim that CSM 6 somehow get more interest on the part of CCP to counter botting is simply insane. NO high sec miner can really support Mittens unless they like the experience of being in their barges while the are exploded by griefers. I am not anti-null, I am anti-null exclusive focus, all of Eve needs to have balanced attention from CCP. That hasn't been the case for some time. But thanks for posting, I enjoy the goon and goon alt bumps. Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate tl;dr - ignore opinion of demographic I'm trying to get support from, make broad assumptions that people think the same way I do and if they don't they are dumb, call fellow miner a goon alt. I don't know why Goons bother to troll you when you wreck your campaign yourself! (Oh right, because it is hilarious.)
I must be doing something right if even the Blitzeners are now attacking me in my campaign thread. I just want to point out I have NOT attacked Hans in his thread, or any other candidate in their campaign threads.
Issler Dainze The Miner's Friend CSM 7 Candidate
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 34 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |