Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 20:57:00 -
[481] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Oh, and: are you ever going to provide any evidence to support your detailed claim about who does what where and under the auspices of whom?
I will, if you can quote me claiming that I had detailed evidence/claims pertaining to who does what, where and under said auspices whom.
Go! Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4748
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 21:04:00 -
[482] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I will, if you can quote me claiming that I had detailed evidence/claims pertaining to who does what, where and under said auspices of whom First of all, would you mind deciding on what question you want answered and stop changing it all the time? This is a third, different variant on a similar theme GÇö each time you change it, you alter what you're asking for.
The quotes for you making claims about who does what where and under the auspices of whom have already been posted.
The quotes for you having evidence of it do not exist GÇö that is the whole problem
So, now that I've answered that question in full GǪ for the fortyeleventh time (and I have even provided links and references) would you mind providing some evidence to support your detailed claim about who does what where and under the auspices of whom? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 21:11:00 -
[483] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I will, if you can quote me claiming that I had detailed evidence/claims pertaining to who does what, where and under said auspices of whom First of all, would you mind deciding on what question you want answered and stop changing it all the time? This is a third, different variant on a similar theme GÇö each time you change it, you alter what you're asking for. The quotes for you making claims about who does what where and under the auspices of whom have already been posted. The quotes for you having evidence of it do not exist GÇö that is the whole problem So, now that I've answered that question in full GǪ for the fortyeleventh time (and I have even provided links and references) would you mind providing some evidence to support your detailed claim about who does what where and under the auspices of whom?
Ah I see... so what you're saying (in a truly long winded and manipulative way) is that you CANNOT quote me making claims regarding your own completely IMAGINARY (and manipulative) claim, that I (claimed) knowledge/evidence of who does what where and under the auspices of whom.
That is right, I never said such a thing... you did. & now you got caught manipulating text just so you can win an argument.
& now, caught not accepting it or letting it go... which is kind of pathetic TBH. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 21:15:00 -
[484] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tippia wrote:If you took the time to read the part you quoted, you would have noticed that you pretty much completely reversed the truth here.
.....Combined with far to much manipulation to Pyramid quote... Let me Underline The Important Parts For YouYa know... since you consistently rewrite history, manipulate and take things out of context...Your version of the truth is not by default, everyone else's truth. This is also something that alludes narcissistic, debate team champions, such as yourself. Your ability to manipulate terms is nicely developed, no doubt over years of practice, but that ability can only make you an aspiring politician or a lawyer, and less of an aspiring scientist or a philosopher. Assuming that even matters to you, since you seem to put such a high value on "winning". If I say that a public domain possesses easy and readily available information on the subject, and in great multitude, then that is my stance. Your insistence to provide google searches and links for the readier, is in fact, directly contradictory to my stance. You and Mr Red Legion guy have chosen to use that perspective as fodder for more then 3 pages, like some idiot politician running a smear campaign because they have nothing truly of substance to offer. I CANNOT possibly ACCURATELY represent, on these gaming forums, the ORGY of information that would suddenly appear to the reader if they bothered to type a short string of words into google, it is FAR TO VAST and you know that. Thus, your tireless baiting of me, and I am not biting, nor will I be swayed or manipulated by such transparent and weak drivel.. My proof exists in full, beyond this gaming venue and it is 100% Contingent on it's state of easy accessibility to everyone who desires to seek it out. 1. Information: is public, readily available and easy to find. 2. Location:internet browser3. Key words: "RMT MMO's" "Bots MMORPG's" "RMT and Botting MMO's" or any other combination. 4. Potential reading material: consists of literally millions of pages of text, all with remarkably similar information. proving that RMT and Botting are now commonplace in ALL Major MMO'sThat is legit, regardless of how much you complain, and regardless of your ill need to get the last word in on a video game forum. My stance is rational, sensible and overloaded with evidence readily available to all. The reader has direction, guidance and a commentary on what they are expected to see. After they then do so, THEY can decide, not you. Them making their own choice, and me not telling them what to think (like you do so often) is the heart and soul of my stance, it's length and breadth and my proof is contingent on the readier's decision making process after the fact. All that you are doing is baiting me with your imagined version of the truth, in the hopes of developing more poop to fling at me. It is not working, and with each passing page your truest nature is beginning to reveal itself. I am happy to take part, although I suspect that most of the people here already knew what you were about anyway. I am also happy to keep throwing facts in your face... Ya know, instead of just bending over to your imagined realities like everyone else does. And again, my SIMPLE stance... undiluted and in plain text for all to see.
My stance. This is it. No mystery here.
Oh and... you lose, so deal with it already. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4749
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 21:52:00 -
[485] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Ah I see... so what you're saying (in a truly long winded and manipulative way) is that you CANNOT quote me making claims regarding your own completely IMAGINARY (and manipulative) claim Now you're asking a fourth, again completely different, thing.
This is why I asked you to make up your mind about what question you want answered, because if you keep changing it between the moment you post it and the moment you evaluate the answer, then you are no longer asking useful questions.
You asked me to GÇ£quote [you] claiming that [you] had detailed evidence/claims pertaining to who does what, where and under said auspices of whomGÇ¥. Now, you are asking me to GÇ£quote [you] making claims regarding [my] completely IMAGINARY (and manipulative) claimGÇ¥.
These are not the same questions. You cannot use the answer to the former as an answer to the latter.
The answer to the former question has already been posted, a few pages back and repeated above for clarity (and here too, you tried to alter the wording to change the move the goalposts of the question GÇö that's pretty bad form, even for you). I can indeed provide quotes of you making detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom, and have already done so, so there is no need to repeat it here.
This fourth question of yours is now three layers deep that I must ask what relevance it has to the topic at hand? You want me to find a quote where [you make claims about [my claim that [you claim to have detailed knowledge about who does what where under the auspices of whom]]], is that correct? Why?
The issue all along is that you haven't provided any evidence to support your detailed claim about having detailed knowledge about who does what where under the auspices of whom. What is the relevance of you commenting on me saying that? Why are you trying to make it seem like it's something that cannot be found when you've been doing it pretty much throughout the entire thread (like here when you GÇö quite incorrectly GÇö claim that it's publicly available information)?
Quote:That is right, I never said such a thing... you did. No, I did not.
Quote:now you got caught manipulating text just so you can win an argument. Prove it. What text did I manipulate?
The one manipulating text around here is you. I think you need to go have your medication checked since you are having an extended period of confusing me and you, and trust me on this: you are not me. It's not even the first time you've done it GÇö you did the same when you claimed that I GÇ£insisted to provide google searchesGÇ¥, when it was you who insisted on doing that.
Quote:My stance. This is it. No mystery here. GǪand it's still irrelevant since it does not provide any proof to support your detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. What you keep quoting was never in question GÇö your claims about specific regions, corps, alliances, and groups of people were.
Quote:Oh and... you lose, so deal with it already. And here I though it wasn't about winning or losing, but about the truth. Why are you so afraid of discovering the truth? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Serene Repose
Perkone Caldari State
210
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 21:52:00 -
[486] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:about 70% of the badposts in this thread can be summed up as 'nerf charismatic attractive people with a modicum of social graces who know how to have a good time on the town' If you do say so yourself. You should get more of your minions to like your post. People might think you're slipping. Unlike me who knows, you have to be somewhere to slip...the unfortunate truth for you, no?
Smokestack lightnin' shinin' just like gold. |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
241
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 22:09:00 -
[487] - Quote
Eternum just go give CCP Skreegs hand jobs until he hires you to fight in the crusade against bots. Only way you will ever be satisfied. Threads like this generally result in anything positive.
Locked. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 22:38:00 -
[488] - Quote
Tippia wrote:nd here I though it wasn't about winning or losing, but about the truth. Why are you so afraid of discovering the truth?
It is also about not permitting ones words to be manipulated by forum warrior politicians
I STILL don't see a quote in your long winded post pertaining to me speaking of... who, what.. auspices whatever? Did I miss it? Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2774
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 22:40:00 -
[489] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:The Mittani wrote:about 70% of the badposts in this thread can be summed up as 'nerf charismatic attractive people with a modicum of social graces who know how to have a good time on the town' If you do say so yourself. You should get more of your minions to like your post. People might think you're slipping. Unlike me who knows, you have to be somewhere to slip...the unfortunate truth for you, no?
where do i have to slip, newbie corp alt, exactly?
spell it out please i'm confused The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4751
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 22:43:00 -
[490] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is also about not permitting ones words to be manipulated by forum warrior politicians Ah, so that's why you're doing it GÇö to test if I will let you or not. Yes. A few pages back. Or wellGǪ you didn't miss it GÇö you read them and did your little GÇ¥moving the goal postsGÇ¥ trick and changed the question that they were supposed to answer and then declared that they didn't answer the new question you invented (which was quite different from the one first asked them to answer and which they did answer). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
|
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 22:47:00 -
[491] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is also about not permitting ones words to be manipulated by forum warrior politicians Ah, so that's why you're doing it GÇö to test if I will let you or not. Yes. A few pages back. Or wellGǪ you didn't miss it GÇö you read them and did your little GÇ¥moving the goal postsGÇ¥ trick and changed the question that they were supposed to answer and then declared that they didn't answer the new question you invented (which was quite different from the one first asked them to answer and which they did answer).
You're lying. Prove me wrong by re-quoting it?
You know... evidence and all that jazz. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Aryndel Vyst
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 22:49:00 -
[492] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Serene Repose wrote:The Mittani wrote:about 70% of the badposts in this thread can be summed up as 'nerf charismatic attractive people with a modicum of social graces who know how to have a good time on the town' If you do say so yourself. You should get more of your minions to like your post. People might think you're slipping. Unlike me who knows, you have to be somewhere to slip...the unfortunate truth for you, no? where do i have to slip, newbie corp alt, exactly? spell it out please i'm confused
You can slip it in anywhere you want you big dirty Chairman. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4751
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 22:52:00 -
[493] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:You're lying. Prove it. Also: about what?
Quote:Prove me wrong by re-quoting it? I don't have to prove you wrong until you've proved yourself right. You made the claim; the burden of proof is on you. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 22:55:00 -
[494] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:You're lying. Prove it. Also: about what? Quote:Prove me wrong by re-quoting it? I don't have to prove you wrong until you've proved yourself right. You made the claim; the burden of proof is on you.
It is on me that you have been unable to quote me saying a thing that you said that I said... for 4-5 pages and going? HAHAHAHAHH!!!! (real laughter in RL)
Ok. well, you don't have a pot to **** in then. * Hugs my T-shirt.
You do have some issues, Tippa. You may be happier in your RL if you get them addressed professionally. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 23:02:00 -
[495] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Serene Repose wrote:The Mittani wrote:about 70% of the badposts in this thread can be summed up as 'nerf charismatic attractive people with a modicum of social graces who know how to have a good time on the town' If you do say so yourself. You should get more of your minions to like your post. People might think you're slipping. Unlike me who knows, you have to be somewhere to slip...the unfortunate truth for you, no? where do i have to slip, newbie corp alt, exactly? spell it out please i'm confused
My corp. Do it to mine. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4751
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 23:10:00 -
[496] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is on me that you have been unable to quote me saying a thing that you said that I said... for 4-5 pages and going? Well, you see, you made a very silly error: you made a claim when you shouldn't have, and I took advantage of it.
If you hadn't been so horny for a cheap jab, you could have skipped the claim and just asked for the information you wanted, but instead you had to get that dig in and completely shifted the burden of proof. This is why you keep getting into these sticky situations: because you are so keen on asserting things rather than asking for them.
You shouldn't have said GǣYou lie, prove me wrongGǥ, because that's just another claim without anything backing it up, followed by an onus probandi fallacy. You should have simply said GǣHuh, yeah, I did miss itGǪ could you link it?Gǥ instead. But alas.
Newbie mistake. Avoid it the next time.
Quote:You do have some issues, Tippa. It's true. My main issue is that I do love teaching, and I do love argumentation analysis. You're a bit slow on the uptake, thoughGǪ
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 23:21:00 -
[497] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:It is on me that you have been unable to quote me saying a thing that you said that I said... for 4-5 pages and going? Well, you see, you made a very silly error: you made a claim when you shouldn't have, and I took advantage of it.
& you can't even quote that I did. I say I did not.
This is your argument. Can you now prove otherwise? Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 23:24:00 -
[498] - Quote
Insert quote pertaining to me claiming that I had detailed evidence/claims pertaining to who does what, where and under said auspices whom.
Under this line...................................................................................
Go ahead. Do it. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Zirse
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
248
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 23:34:00 -
[499] - Quote
You are ~literally~ a two-year old |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4752
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 23:43:00 -
[500] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tippia wrote:Well, you see, you made a very silly error: you made a claim when you shouldn't have, and I took advantage of it. & you can't even quote that I did. Sure I can. From post 491 above:
You said GÇ£You're lying. Prove me wrong by re-quoting it? GÇ¥
By making this claim, you needlessly shifted the burden of proof to yourself (and then made that silly GÇ£prove me wrongGÇ¥, which becomes an onus probandi fallacy since, until you've provided proof for your claim, no-one needs to disprove it.)
Quote:Insert quote pertaining to me claiming that I had detailed evidence/claims pertaining to who does what, where and under said auspices whom. First of all, you can skip the GÇ£evidenceGÇ¥ part because, as I have already explained numerous times, the whole problem is that you never provided any evidence, and I have never claimed that you did GÇö quite the opposite. As a result, you really shouldn't be quite so cheerful over the fact that no-one can produce such a quote because that just means that we are right in saying that you've made a fallacy of division.
So what you're asking for is a GÇ£quote pertaining to [you] claiming that [you] had detailed claims pertaining to who does what, where and under said auspices whom.GÇ¥
I provided this back in posts 387, 395, and 397; further referenced by Zirse's post 393 and RubyPorto's post 419. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
|
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 23:47:00 -
[501] - Quote
Quote:I think you should quote the part where I submitted evidence /statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. Because a statement like "Drone space is botting central" most certainly does not fall under that category, and at this point you have deviated so far from reality that I have no idea what you are talking about
This is the most relevant post on those pages. You have yet to yield anything that could be classified as me submitted evidence /statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. Because... for the last time (although probably not ) you made it up.
Never did I make a such a claim. Nor did my side of this lengthy, bullshit debate, ever consist of it.
You like to put words in other people's mouth as a tool/tactic to support your own agenda. As I have stated for... Jesus. Three days LOL. You have not fulfilled your own minimum requirements... so **** that noise. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 23:53:00 -
[502] - Quote
However... I have decided to formulate a new forum thread based upon your polite request. This should be amusing. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Ai Shun
218
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 23:56:00 -
[503] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Quote:I think you should quote the part where I submitted evidence /statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. Because a statement like "Drone space is botting central" most certainly does not fall under that category, and at this point you have deviated so far from reality that I have no idea what you are talking about This is the most relevant post on those pages. You have yet to yield anything that could be classified as me submitted evidence /statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. Because... for the last time (although probably not ) you made it up. Never did I make a such a claim. Nor did my side of this lengthy, bullshit debate, ever consist of it. You like to put words in other people's mouth as a tool/tactic to support your own agenda. As I have stated for... Jesus. Three days LOL. You have not fulfilled your own minimum requirements... so **** that noise.
Refer to RubyPorto's post #419. I can't say I like the way you accuse others without backing it up without evidence. And this **** has to carry on for 17 odd pages?
You could simply apologise, you know. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 00:08:00 -
[504] - Quote
I tried to find a common ground with him and explained that "Drone regions is botting central" was an outdated comment, because all other regions are now just as prone to bots and RMT as the drone regions. The rest of nullsec has caught up with them.
I did not my outdated view and I corrected it. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4753
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 00:18:00 -
[505] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:This is the most relevant post on those pages. Pages? I gave you very specific posts in my links. That part only really appears in RubyPorto's post, and he explained it quite clearly.
Quote:You have yet to yield anything that could be classified as me submitted evidence /statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. There you go changing the question again. See if you can spot the difference between these two requests:
1. GÇ£Insert quote pertaining to me claiming that I had detailed evidence/claims pertaining to who does what, where and under said auspices whom.GÇ¥ GÇö the posts I linked do exactly this. In fact, most of the thread does, if we want to be really pedantic. Your use of GÇ£pertainingGÇ¥ makes your request very broad, so really, anything could be used. I'm kind enough to give you actual quotes that explains your claim.
2. Insert quote GÇ£classified as me submitting statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom.GÇ¥ GÇö the way you've written this request, we are now talking about any post you make where you discuss your having made those original detailed claims. Pretty much anything you've posted from page 20 and onwards fulfils this criterion. Any time you said that I couldn't (or didn't) fulfil request 1 above, you made a post where you make statements regarding the detailed claims GÇö specifically, you make the statement that you don't think or believe you've ever made any such claims.
Quote:Never did I make a such a claim. Your referent is very unclear here. What, exactly, are you referring to by GÇ£such a claimGÇ¥?
I'm tempted to assume that you mean you never made any detailed claim about who does what etc., but given how often you alter the actual question and add new layers of claims about claims, such an assumption is not safe to make. I can tell you that, if it is indeed this original detailed claim about who does what etc. that you're referring to, then you did indeed make such a claim GÇö again, see posts 393, 387, 395, 397, and 419.
Quote:Nor did my side of this lengthy, bullshit debate, ever consist of it. Well, sure, aside from accidentally making the original claim, no GÇö you then tried to mostly harp on about general matters and tried to use those generalities as some kind of proof for the specifics you asserted. However, as was pointed out from the very beginning, this does not fulfil your burden of proof so your detailed claim remains unproven.
Quote:You have not fulfilled your own minimum requirements. GǪexcept for just about every time you've asked for it, even when you've committed the fallacy of moving the goal posts in an attempt to invalidate the answers. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
242
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 00:25:00 -
[506] - Quote
Just an innocent car driving through a great thread. Threads like this generally result in anything positive.
Locked. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
473
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 00:35:00 -
[507] - Quote
Still not budging. Your words, your question and not mine.
I kind of like this & yes, I will soon be addressing your topic in a totally new thread (soontm) Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4753
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 00:39:00 -
[508] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Your words, your question and not mine. GǪyou mean aside from them being direct quotes of your words and questions. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
1346
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 00:44:00 -
[509] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Still not budging. Your words, your question and not mine. I kind of like this & yes, I will soon be addressing your topic in a totally new thread (soontm)
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=738324#post738324 Post 419 on this thread, where I quote, link, and explain where you made 10 different claims; to support which you never provided evidence.
Nobody has ever said you provided evidence to support your claims and that is the entirety of the problem we've been discussing for 17 pages.
If you are still confused by the contents of that post, I would be more than happy to rewrite the explanation at a 2nd grade reading level rather than the ~5th grade reading level that that post may require.
Again, that post provides the specific textual evidence that you made claims 1-10. You either need to provide some sort of evidence (or quote yourself providing such in a post that I missed) to back up some or all of those claims, or you must retract some or all of them as unfounded.
This is how rational people seek truth; by making claims (backed by evidence) and then debating the merits of those claims and their evidence. We're still stuck between your making claims and backing them up with evidence. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed RED.Legion
1346
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 00:46:00 -
[510] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tippia wrote:nd here I though it wasn't about winning or losing, but about the truth. Why are you so afraid of discovering the truth? It is also about not permitting ones words to be manipulated by forum warrior politicians I STILL don't see a quote in your long winded post pertaining to me speaking of... who, what.. auspices whatever? Did I miss it?
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=738324#post738324 Post 419 on this thread, where I quote, link, and explain where you made 10 different claims; to support which you never provided evidence. Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |