Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 96 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Thunder Jolt
Frozen Monkeys
7
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 07:03:00 -
[1141] - Quote
Maratega wrote:I just note here: Avast antivirus got False Positive Report( Win32:Evo-gen(susp) ) to Updater.exe, and put that to Quarantine. Needed to Switch off, for update.
Yup Avast Web Agent doesn't like the last version of the updater. Wasn't happening before
|
Steijn
Quay Industries
454
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 10:52:00 -
[1142] - Quote
Im not getting any alert from Avast, but am getting a message saying the 'update cannot be completed at this time, try again later.' |
Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Black Core Alliance
1398
|
Posted - 2014.01.30 12:58:00 -
[1143] - Quote
Thunder Jolt wrote:Maratega wrote:I just note here: Avast antivirus got False Positive Report( Win32:Evo-gen(susp) ) to Updater.exe, and put that to Quarantine. Needed to Switch off, for update.
Yup Avast Web Agent doesn't like the last version of the updater. Wasn't happening before OK thanks for these reports.
My thinking is that Avast changed some logic that you didn't notice until the updater actually did something. I haven't updated that program in probably a year. This is why the last update I made came up now.
Reading up on what that error is about, I think what it sees is that you just downloaded a program, which then makes web requests for more programs. Generally, it probably thinks...well this is malware behavior but since Updater.exe is not in their database of known malware, it throws a general error to alert you.
I just ran a virus scan on my files again (I do this regularly anyway) and nothing found.
So I'll see if I can send some details to Avast maybe? I don't know how that works but for now I think you are fine just adding an exception to the file for now. Of course, you can always download the code from sourceforge if you think I'm doing something funky. You can also see my really bad coding
Other than that perhaps I can change the updater somehow, since I know other programs can run updates like this, but I'd have to dig into that to see what else to do. GÇ£Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do. GÇ¥ - Dale Carnegie
Maximze your Industry Potential! - Download EVE Isk per Hour! |
Joost Caldari
Joost Inventor Labs The Ancients.
7
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 02:47:00 -
[1144] - Quote
Quick question about BP management.
Let's say on January 1st I scanned my corp assets and found 100 BPs (originals and copies, T1 and T2). I spend some time to enter all the correct ME and PE manually... All works great.
In the next month I spend a lot of effort manufacturing stuff, inventing new T2 BP's, copying BPOs and maybe buy a few more as well. Now, I want to update IPH with the latest BPs on January 31st. What is the best way?
When I scan my corp assets again, it will pickup all existing and new BPs. But when I use "update options" again, it will overwrite the existing ME and PE values of the BPs that existed already on January 1st with ME0 and PE0. How can I remove the BPs that are exhausted and add only the BPs that didn't exist before without losing the information added on January 1st?
I always seem to end up manually editing all my BPs again and again. Am I missing something? |
Thunder Jolt
Frozen Monkeys
7
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 13:30:00 -
[1145] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:OK thanks for these reports. My thinking is that Avast changed some logic that you didn't notice until the updater actually did something. I haven't updated that program in probably a year. This is why the last update I made came up now. Reading up on what that error is about, I think what it sees is that you just downloaded a program, which then makes web requests for more programs. Generally, it probably thinks...well this is malware behavior but since Updater.exe is not in their database of known malware, it throws a general error to alert you. I just ran a virus scan on my files again (I do this regularly anyway) and nothing found. So I'll see if I can send some details to Avast maybe? I don't know how that works but for now I think you are fine just adding an exception to the file for now. Of course, you can always download the code from sourceforge if you think I'm doing something funky. You can also see my really bad coding Other than that perhaps I can change the updater somehow, since I know other programs can run updates like this, but I'd have to dig into that to see what else to do. Thanks for clarifying Zifrian :) I will obviously add an exception to Avast. Maybe add a heads up in the Original Post in case people start to flood the topic about that ?
Cheers |
Gilbaron
Free-Space-Ranger Nulli Secunda
1200
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 00:16:00 -
[1146] - Quote
a small feature request:
the blueprints tab should shot the SVR value for a selected blueprint <3 We are recruiting german-speaking PVP players, contact me :)
Banner was used for this Post |
Kinisson Hawkings
Entropic Nebula
1
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 20:45:00 -
[1147] - Quote
hi!
is it just me or Invention Costs are not taken into account in the manufacturing list?
Fly safe... |
Maxdig
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 15:34:00 -
[1148] - Quote
Love this program but having an issue. Since the last patch things have been screwey, ME lvl's not working correctly and such, then a new patch came out which I hope fixed that, but when I go to install it I get an EVEIPH Updater Error "There was an error in the update. Program not updated. Cannot copy item price cache". After this it goes back to do you want to update the program... |
Maxdig
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 15:56:00 -
[1149] - Quote
Fixed, manually installed updates and seems to have worked that way. |
Bambi
Creation Inc.
2
|
Posted - 2014.02.07 16:41:00 -
[1150] - Quote
Would it be possible to have a save csv file option on the shopping list rather than having to copy it then paste it and save it?
|
|
Spectre Wraith
Darwin Inc.
124
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 21:57:00 -
[1151] - Quote
Is there not a way to import BPOs from a corporation into the program or am I totally overlooking it? Or do I have to really go through and manually enter them all in? I feel like if it is possible, it's staring at me dead in the face. |
Shocknawe
Hentogaira Technical Community College
8
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 23:24:00 -
[1152] - Quote
Spectre Wraith wrote:Is there not a way to import BPOs from a corporation into the program or am I totally overlooking it? Or do I have to really go through and manually enter them all in? I feel like if it is possible, it's staring at me dead in the face.
Have a corp key put in.
Edit dropdown menu > manage blueprints
Scan Corp Assets button
|
Spectre Wraith
Darwin Inc.
124
|
Posted - 2014.02.09 00:15:00 -
[1153] - Quote
Yep, I derped. Thanks for pointing out the obvious, I indeed missed it. Thanks. |
Nek Niminen
Deep Core Inventing Inc
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.13 09:38:00 -
[1154] - Quote
Hello Sorry for bad English. Could you make a small function in the program, namely the ability to copy information from the fields "Total Component Costs" and "Total Raw Mat Costs" to the clipboard? |
Jointi Severe
Blackstar Privateers Disavowed.
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.14 15:50:00 -
[1155] - Quote
When using the Invention tool, it only copies the ME/PE over to the blueprint, but not the number of runs. Is there a reason this doesn't happen automatically? |
Hiton Kado
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2014.02.15 14:44:00 -
[1156] - Quote
Awesome tool! However, I have one problem maybe someone could help me with.
Is there a way to use my the list of blueprints I entered on one character also on all of my other characters? |
Maratega
FREE GATES Sorry We're In Your Space Eh
38
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 01:40:00 -
[1157] - Quote
Bug report
Application settings - default copy time modifier - default invention time modifier - default build time modifier
You set these, and make a save. The settings saving only temporary.
After restart the program, the values reset to default value 1.0. |
Fenn Herstal
Fabrique Nationale d'Airstall
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.19 16:18:00 -
[1158] - Quote
Source: System.Data.SQLite Message: Attempt to write a read-only database attempt to write a readonly database Data: System.Collections.ListDictionaryInternal Target: Int32 Reset(System.Data.SQLite.SQLiteStatement)
Also, please fill out the following information as appropriate:
Operating System: Screen or Tab where Error Occurred: Blueprint Management Steps to reproduce the Error: In BP Search, search for Dealer. Edit ME and PE.
boom
Exception Dump: System.Data.SQLite.SQLiteException (0x80004005): Attempt to write a read-only database attempt to write a readonly database at System.Data.SQLite.SQLite3.Reset(SQLiteStatement stmt) at System.Data.SQLite.SQLite3.Step(SQLiteStatement stmt) at System.Data.SQLite.SQLiteDataReader.NextResult() at System.Data.SQLite.SQLiteDataReader..ctor(SQLiteCommand cmd, CommandBehavior behave) at System.Data.SQLite.SQLiteCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior) at System.Data.SQLite.SQLiteCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at EVE_Isk_per_Hour.Public_Variables.ExecuteNonQuerySQL(String SQL) at EVE_Isk_per_Hour.Public_Variables.UpdateBPinDB(Int64 BPID, Int32 bpME, Int32 bpPE, BPType BPType, Boolean Favorite) at EVE_Isk_per_Hour.frmBlueprintManagement.ProcessKeyDownBPEdit(Keys SentKey) at EVE_Isk_per_Hour.frmBlueprintManagement.txtBPEdit_LostFocus(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnLostFocus(EventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmKillFocus(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.TextBoxBase.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.TextBox.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) |
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
6299
|
Posted - 2014.02.20 21:56:00 -
[1159] - Quote
One time bump to fix forum. |
Jean de Trey
EVE University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.25 15:27:00 -
[1160] - Quote
What exactly do "owned" and "not owned" mean in the context of this program? I scanned my assets via the API and found several BPCs, but they are all currently marked "no owned". Clearly, since they are in my assets, I own them, so I must be missing something in my understanding of how the term "owned" is intended to be used here. |
|
Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Black Core Alliance
1403
|
Posted - 2014.02.25 16:47:00 -
[1161] - Quote
Jean de Trey wrote:What exactly do "owned" and "not owned" mean in the context of this program? I scanned my assets via the API and found several BPCs, but they are all currently marked "no owned". Clearly, since they are in my assets, I own them, so I must be missing something in my understanding of how the term "owned" is intended to be used here. You need to mark them as owned in BP Management. It uses the ME/PE data you save to calculate bp data.
There is really no difference between a bp you import or one in the base database list because I cannot get ME/PE data from the API. So a BP marked as owned basically tells me that you looked at the BP and the ME/PE data stored is what you want me to use to calculate the material list. GÇ£Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do. GÇ¥ - Dale Carnegie
Maximze your Industry Potential! - Download EVE Isk per Hour! |
Noah Vikeen
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.26 16:41:00 -
[1162] - Quote
On the mineral pricing, is there a way to pull in what I actually have been paying for minerals instead of what the market shows at the time? So maybe a 2 or 4 week moving average of what I have actually been paying for minerals.
Thanks Noah |
Batelle
HOMELE55
1919
|
Posted - 2014.02.26 17:17:00 -
[1163] - Quote
It doens't make sense for invention time to be included in ISK/Hr calculation because inventing uses different slots. Unless I am mistaken checking this box just adds the invention time directly onto the manufacturing time.
I'd much rather see a checkbox to include component manufacture time, since those use the same industry slots, and if im making components on an alt I can just untick the box.
What I'm finding is that I have to do my own calculations to see if invention slots or manufacturing is my bottleneck, so for t2 invention I'm only using IPH to help with shopping lists and comparing profit/unit for small subsets of items that have similar build times and component usage. Still very useful for those things though!
PS I hope sacrificing that rapier to drop bombers on my deimos the other night was worth it. Was he expecting to survive or something? "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |
Gilbaron
Free-Space-Ranger Nulli Secunda
1216
|
Posted - 2014.02.27 18:20:00 -
[1164] - Quote
feature request:
allow me to paste information from the client to IPH, such as minerals or components that i already have in station to adjust the buy list, or, even cooler: ME/PE Values for my blueprints using this method: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3305492#post3305492 GRRR Goons |
Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Black Core Alliance
1403
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 11:25:00 -
[1165] - Quote
Noah Vikeen wrote:On the mineral pricing, is there a way to pull in what I actually have been paying for minerals instead of what the market shows at the time? So maybe a 2 or 4 week moving average of what I have actually been paying for minerals.
Thanks Noah No there isn't. You could enter your own prices manually or import. I would like to allow pulling data from the cache files but then I need to store them historically but that's quite a bit of work at this point. So not something I'd do relatively soon.
Batelle wrote:It doens't make sense for invention time to be included in ISK/Hr calculation because inventing uses different slots. Unless I am mistaken checking this box just adds the invention time directly onto the manufacturing time. That's all the box does. For someone that uses alts well, this really doesn't apply. In fact if you are making items with longer build times than invention times, you shouldn't ever run into this on one character. However, if you started from scratch and were using your other build lines you could potentially want to see this.
Batelle wrote:I'd much rather see a checkbox to include component manufacture time, since those use the same industry slots, and if im making components on an alt I can just untick the box.
What I'm finding is that I have to do my own calculations to see if invention slots or manufacturing is my bottleneck, so for t2 invention I'm only using IPH to help with shopping lists and comparing profit/unit for small subsets of items that have similar build times and component usage. Still very useful for those things though! That basically exists now. The BP production time is just the time if you built from the blueprint and had alts or whatever building all the components. The Component production time is the time to build all the components as efficiently as you can on the lines you have. In Build/Buy mode it'll adjust the time based on what you don't need to build.
This bottleneck discussion has come up before and I'm not sure how I would provide a tool that could help with it.
Batelle wrote:PS I hope sacrificing that rapier to drop bombers on my deimos the other night was worth it. Was he expecting to survive or something? Haha, yeah he was trying to bait someone and you popped up and it was like...oh crap get here now, I'm going to die...so no he knew he was going down heh.
Thanks for the cut/copy suggestion I might add that in addition to the asset scanning function I'm working on now. And on the BP thing, yes...I've been planning on doing that as well. GÇ£Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do. GÇ¥ - Dale Carnegie
Maximze your Industry Potential! - Download EVE Isk per Hour! |
Gilbaron
Free-Space-Ranger Nulli Secunda
1219
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 12:33:00 -
[1166] - Quote
Quote: Thanks for the cut/copy suggestion I might add that in addition to the asset scanning function I'm working on now. And on the BP thing, yes...I've been planning on doing that as well.
you are awesome ! keep it coming :) GRRR Goons |
Noemi Kautsuo
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
36
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 20:47:00 -
[1167] - Quote
Great tool and awesome work so far!
The only thing that is a bit confusing is the tax calculation. Would be cool if there was an option to manually edit the tax values (both broker and sales tax) and to see two separate tax calculations; for buy orders and the tax for selling the final product. |
Batelle
HOMELE55
2002
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 21:29:00 -
[1168] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:That's all the box does. For someone that uses alts well, this really doesn't apply. In fact if you are making items with longer build times than invention times, you shouldn't ever run into this on one character. However, if you started from scratch and were using your other build lines you could potentially want to see this.
Leaving components out for now, if the time to manufacture a bpc (accounting for success rate and runs per success) is shorter than the invention time, then invention is the bottleneck and checking the box should probably result in using the invention time (again accounting for success and runs) as the ONLY time denominator for isk/hour, rather than adding the two together. If the manufacturing time is longer (no components), then I probably won't be interested in the invention time at all. I just don't see any situation where adding invention time to manufacturing time could possibly be useful or accurately describe what's going on, because in truth they run in parallel rather than in series.
What I do in my own spreadsheet is for each possible job/decryptor combination, I calculate the invention slot time per run and the manufacturing time per run, giving me a ratio to identify the bottleneck. I do a bit more manipulation and see that for a process decryptor, I should use all 10 invention slots, but for one of those +run decyptors only using 3 invention slots will max out my manufacturing capacity.
Zifrian wrote: That basically exists now. The BP production time is just the time if you built from the blueprint and had alts or whatever building all the components. The Component production time is the time to build all the components as efficiently as you can on the lines you have. In Build/Buy mode it'll adjust the time based on what you don't need to build.
This bottleneck discussion has come up before and I'm not sure how I would provide a tool that could help with it.
People ask for it for the same reason its hard to design a tool to address it. Its hard.
Zifrian wrote:Batelle wrote:PS I hope sacrificing that rapier to drop bombers on my deimos the other night was worth it. Was he expecting to survive or something? Haha, yeah he was trying to bait someone and you popped up and it was like...oh crap get here now, I'm going to die...so no he knew he was going down heh.
He killed a cyno with some drones and ran away as a carrier shot his shields with sentries. He then stopped about 80km out and the carrier deaggressed. I charged at him with my deimos (all 80km) figuring he would just warp out, but he didn't. You guys got there at the very last second b/c i swear he was dead and i was halfway to warping out before i was tackled. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |
Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Black Core Alliance
1405
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 10:50:00 -
[1169] - Quote
Batelle wrote: Leaving components out for now, if the time to manufacture a bpc (accounting for success rate and runs per success) is shorter than the invention time, then invention is the bottleneck and checking the box should probably result in using the invention time (again accounting for success and runs) as the ONLY time denominator for isk/hour, rather than adding the two together. If the manufacturing time is longer (no components), then I probably won't be interested in the invention time at all. I just don't see any situation where adding invention time to manufacturing time could possibly be useful or accurately describe what's going on, because in truth they run in parallel rather than in series.
What I do in my own spreadsheet is for each possible job/decryptor combination, I calculate the invention slot time per run and the manufacturing time per run, giving me a ratio to identify the bottleneck. I do a bit more manipulation and see that for a process decryptor, I should use all 10 invention slots, but for one of those +run decyptors only using 3 invention slots will max out my manufacturing capacity.
OK this is helpful. Most times people ask about bottlenecks but never explain what they are specifically talking about. I'll see what I can do along these lines.
GÇ£Any fool can criticize, condemn, and complain - and most fools do. GÇ¥ - Dale Carnegie
Maximze your Industry Potential! - Download EVE Isk per Hour! |
DragonfIy
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 17:07:00 -
[1170] - Quote
solved |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 .. 96 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |