|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
80
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 13:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Are you talking about WH space or Null? Cause Anoms in WH space pay a pittance compared to Sigs. Also, the sentence you quoted referred quite clearly to WH space. .
lol, you're doing it wrong.
No local in null would shake things up a bit, for those alliances that build bubble fortresses on gates for there anomaly/mining ops would have to actually start manning the gates but it will never happen because the carebear nullsec'ers will cry too hard |
seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
80
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 13:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Andski wrote:seany1212 wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Are you talking about WH space or Null? Cause Anoms in WH space pay a pittance compared to Sigs. Also, the sentence you quoted referred quite clearly to WH space. . lol, you're doing it wrong. No local in null would shake things up a bit, for those alliances that build bubble fortresses on gates for there anomaly/mining ops would have to actually start manning the gates but it will never happen because the carebear nullsec'ers will cry too hard lmao you think people mine in nullsec like peasants you're dumb
mine hulls, duhhh |
seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
81
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 15:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nova Fox wrote:Razin wrote:Nova Fox wrote:Okay lets go hypothetical and I am not an idiot bot programmer and let my bots do something a person cant.
I have 100 bots and I sync them to dscan one ship every 1/100th of a second from the next one and have them setup to talk to each other. The moment one of them sees +1 more ship than them theyll cloak up. Only thing a bot needs to do is count dscan results not much different from current bots.
Now you might be smart enough to smash dscan as soon as you jump in and before you decloak/recloak to go hunting but in tha tone instance boom they're gone. IMO your mistake is in looking for a flaw in the current d-scan that works with current local. Granted, CCP is known for taking the easy way out (see WTZ); however there is hope that d-scan gets some severe updates if and when delayed local is implemented. Agreed but if they keep it the same, the status quo is almost not going to change that much. And killing one of them isnt going to do much to stop them as on person stated, say hi to my bomber and Im like dude you need an entire wing of bombers and chances are not all of the bots are in the same area.
Except the bots are never going to know when you left, or if you logged, or if you jumped an alt in then logged, or whether they should log back in if they logged off. You can come up with a million counters, or counter-counters but the cloak will be the number 1 thing cried about if local went. I hope it goes go, null has it on easy mode for any alliance that has enough space and enough members to patrol and fill it. With the exception of wars of course |
seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
81
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 15:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Andski wrote:seany1212 wrote:Except the bots are never going to know when you left, or if you logged, or if you jumped an alt in then logged, or whether they should log back in if they logged off. You can come up with a million counters, or counter-counters but the cloak will be the number 1 thing cried about if local went. I hope it goes go, null has it on easy mode for any alliance that has enough space and enough members to patrol and fill it. With the exception of wars of course it's almost like an alliance and its members work to achieve this level of security but no let's throw away all of that because a few guys can't figure out ways to kill ratters
Instant local, cloaks and nullifier t3s, its almost like you dont need to be at the keyboard to rat at all |
|
|
|