EVE Search - Nanos should be nerfed

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Nanos should be nerfed

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Alowishus mUfFiN fAcToRy Sex Panthers	Posted - 2008.04.23 22:37:00 - [31] I have no problem with nano ships (in fact I use them!) but I laugh at people who think it's the only way. Some of you should expand your horizons. I also laugh at people on the other side of the coin who won't adapt their tactics and want the Devs to solve all their problems with nerfs. Eve is filled with such one dimensional tards. At least they amuse me. Join The Muffin Factory
Korthan Ghost Festival	Posted - 2008.04.23 23:42:00 - [32] The OP is so full of FAILÖ it's hilarious tbh. In a 30 man gang with BS's in it you should at least have 3-5 of them fitted with remote reps or shield transfers... I mean how noobish can you be?? I personally don't fly anything fast except for ceptors as I tend to lose nano-fitted ships rather easily despite the stupid speed they have, so it is possible to counter nano's unless it was like a 5 man nano-curse gang which I have to say is rather *** lol
ViperVenom Labteck Corporation LTD. Libertas Fidelitas	Posted - 2008.04.23 23:42:00 - [33] Quite simple.. Hug/Rapier Hvy Neuts. People are man when they get solo killed by a Vaga? Vaga have bad dps, also there made to be fast. Minnie ship in general are fast and made to be fast. And Most small Nano gang will flee If the see a Hug.. Use better tactics and try again. I shall never reply to this type of post again. Boo CCP!!!!
Clinically Gallente ANZAC ALLIANCE Southern Cross Alliance	Posted - 2008.04.23 23:50:00 - [34] Proposing new thread title: People that suck at EvE should be banned from forum whining ________________ Originally by: Evil Thug I wear pink panties.
NightmareX Quam Singulari Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.04.24 00:12:00 - [35] Edited by: NightmareX on 24/04/2008 00:15:33 OMG, T2 frigs is faster than our nano HAC's, and they can get out of the fight without losing anything, NEEEEEEEEEERRRRRFFFF frigs pls. Stupid posts like this should have deserved a 1 month ingame & forum ban for beeing stupid.
Crackzilla The Shadow Order SMASH Alliance	Posted - 2008.04.24 00:24:00 - [36] Originally by: NightmareX T2 frigs is faster than our nano HAC's, and they can get out of the fight without losing anything, Frigs are a trade off. They have no tank, no real dps, very little cap. Nanos are better than frigs in nearly every catagory except cost and price. Nanos are vastly preferred to ceptors. Why fly a ceptor when a nano can usually do a superior job?
ndor Minmatar Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2008.04.24 00:26:00 - [37] I wish CCP invented a module you can put on your ships that slow ships down dramatically..... If only.... And if only they'd give certain classes a range bonus to that module, it'd basically render nano-ships useless... Particularly considering the gimped camp and overall low DPS. I'd petition CCP and ask them to invent such a module :)
NightmareX Quam Singulari Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.04.24 00:35:00 - [38] Originally by: ***zilla Originally by:** NightmareX T2 frigs is faster than our nano HAC's, and they can get out of the fight without losing anything, Frigs are a trade off. They have no tank, no real dps, very little cap. Nanos are better than frigs in nearly every catagory except cost and price. Nanos are vastly preferred to ceptors. Why fly a ceptor when a nano can usually do a superior job? Do you expect a T2 frig to be better than a HAC then? T2 frigs are good for speed and tackle. So if they see that they don't have a chance, they will bugger off. It's the same with HAC's vs BS'es, if the HAC's see that they don't have a chance, they will most likely get out. And even more, BS'es vs Carriers / Dreads, the BS'es will get out if they see that they can't handle the carriers / dreads.
Efdi Minmatar Brannigan's Law	Posted - 2008.04.24 00:37:00 - [39] Originally by: *****zilla Recons are better than EAS in nearly every catagory except cost and price. Recons are vastly preferred to EAS. Why fly a EAS when a Recon can usually do a superior job? See what I did there? We should probably go ahead and nerf all the Recons too, while we're nerfing nanos.
Wet Ferret	Posted - 2008.04.24 00:53:00 - [40] Originally by: Efdi Originally by: ****zilla Recons are better than EAS in nearly every catagory except cost and price. Recons are vastly preferred to EAS. Why fly a EAS when a Recon can usually do a superior job? See what I did there? We should probably go ahead and nerf all the Recons too, while we're nerfing nanos. What did you do there, miss the point? But you made a good one at least... EAS are meant* to be mini recons. HACs were never meant to be big interceptors. But while we're talking about AFs, I remember them being widely used a few years ago, before bigger ships were granted superspeed. Kinda miss the days, when there was variety in PvP. Oh well. Nano it is.

Phil Miller Royal Hiigaran Navy	Posted - 2008.04.24 00:53:00 - [41] Edited by: Phil Miller on 24/04/2008 00:54:47 Question remains, why does it take more than 1 person(or a very specialized vessel like a huggin/rapier) to kill a nano ship?
Arkios Odymei Incarnation of Evil Nocturnal Legion	Posted - 2008.04.24 01:39:00 - [42] Originally by: Phil Miller Question remains, why does it take more than 1 person(or a very specialized vessel like a huggin/rapier) to kill a nano ship? Heavy Neuts Damp their range so they have to get close if they want to fight Asteroid Bumping Technique if in a belt (Or with a station, or any other Large Collidable for that matter) If your ship has a MWD and Web of its own, Use any of the above to kill a nano. None of these require more than one person, nor a specific ship. Keep in mind that there are also plenty of ways to Get away from / scare them off / force them to dissengage, such as warrior II's, ECM, Missile spam, etc ------------------------------------------------------------------
Trader Jjoe	Posted - 2008.04.24 01:52:00 - [43] Hi I am a pilot who wants you to play the game only the way I want to play it and that is in big ships with big guns. Please make it so I can win all the time and not have to think. K thanks, bye. I fly, nano, BS, recon, and even SB (well before dampner nerf). Its just stupid to run around yelling nerf when there are so many easy tactics. The fact that out of 30 ships you had nothing to deal with small ships means you guys were some kind of sniper fleet with Zero Meaningful support. Not the nano's fault. Its yours. I mean when you make mistakes in real life is your gut reaction to blame others or to turn around and go hmm, what did we do wrong, and how do we correct it? Well I can tell you it pains me to think that there are people who all they do is blame others. Sad.
Dragons Talon	Posted - 2008.04.24 02:09:00 - [44] If memory serves me, nanos have already been nerf'ed once...now either adapt or shutup already... and to be clear..the ONLy time I fit nano's is on my mammoth.
Megan Maynard Minmatar Out of Order	Posted - 2008.04.24 02:19:00 - [45] Die troll. Miz Stelth Bomerz iz the ****nit.
thatguy Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2008.04.24 03:12:00 - [46] Edited by: thatguy on 24/04/2008 03:14:28 Originally by: Clinically Proposing new thread title: People that suck at EvE should be banned from forum whining well said. Improvise Adapt Overcome Someone purchase the OP a T2 Can of Man and a T3 cup of Suck it the FK up. p.s. somone mentioned why it takes more than 1 person to take down a nano ship... because EvE is centered around TEAMWORK!! It's a radical concept for some I know.
ceyriot Induseng Enterprises R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.04.24 04:33:00 - [47] This? Faction Store
ceyriot Induseng Enterprises R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.04.24 04:34:00 - [48] Edited by: ceyriot on 24/04/2008 04:35:02 oops. Faction Store
Koramaur Gallente Amistad Annihilate Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.04.24 04:42:00 - [49] 1. Remove Polycarb Rigs. 2. Enjoy. Has anyone ever suggested the all out removal of Polycarb's? The only good nano fit's usually require them, so just get rid of them. I'm serious.
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.04.24 04:53:00 - [50] Originally by: Captain Sonata Originally by: Derek Sigres Most nano ships can't go fast enough to evade fire completely those that can are unable to do anything in return. Ishtar, Curse, Rapier/Huggin, Vaga etc -- yeah, poor ol' them, and their ability to not do a thing at range. Vaga can't do **** while nanoing. Rapier and Huginn only have a few unbonused drones. But you knew that... --

Tai Paktu Mortis Incarnatus	Posted - 2008.04.24 05:01:00 - [51] Y'all got trolled. 1/10. Try harder...better yet, don't. ______ http://eve-files.com/sig/TaiPaktu/sig3.PNG
Danari Viper Squad Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.04.24 05:02:00 - [52] Originally by: ViperVenom And Most small Nano gang will flee If the see a Hug.. Um what? 1 huginn? He's primary and then carry on.
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.04.24 05:04:00 - [53] Originally by: Danari Originally by: ViperVenom And Most small Nano gang will flee If the see a Hug.. Um what? 1 huginn? He's primary and then carry on. So are atleast 2 or 3 of their ships as well. Remember, he had 30 friends... --
Danari Viper Squad Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.04.24 05:04:00 - [54] Originally by: Phil Miller Edited by: Phil Miller on 24/04/2008 00:54:47 Question remains, why does it take more than 1 person(or a very specialized vessel like a huggin/rapier) to kill a nano ship? Why does it take more than one person to kill a faction tanked raven?
Anubis Xian Vertigo One	Posted - 2008.04.24 05:07:00 - [55] Originally by: Danari Originally by: Phil Miller Edited by: Phil Miller on 24/04/2008 00:54:47 Question remains, why does it take more than 1 person(or a very specialized vessel like a huggin/rapier) to kill a nano ship? Why does it take more than one person to kill a faction tanked raven? It does? Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal. I'm the Juggernaut, *****!
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.04.24 05:10:00 - [56] Originally by: Phil Miller Edited by: Phil Miller on 24/04/2008 00:54:47 Question remains, why does it take more than 1 person(or a very specialized vessel like a huggin/rapier) to kill a nano ship? It doesn't, as people have mentioned COUNTLESS times and you have chosen to ignore, but even if it did, because this game is rock paper scissor. You chose Paper, bring your friend with rock, because the other guy chose scissor. --
Danari Viper Squad Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.04.24 05:13:00 - [57] Originally by: Marcus Druallis Originally by: Phil Miller Edited by: Phil Miller on 24/04/2008 00:54:47 Question remains, why does it take more than 1 person(or a very specialized vessel like a huggin/rapier) to kill a nano ship? It doesn't, as people have mentioned COUNTLESS times and you have chosen to ignore, but even if it did, because this game is rock paper scissor. You chose Paper, bring your friend with rock, because the other guy chose scissor. There have definitely been ravens out there challenging any one ship to break its tank. So suck on your flame until smoke blows out your ass.
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.04.24 05:17:00 - [58] Originally by: Danari Originally by: Marcus Druallis Originally by: Phil Miller Edited by: Phil Miller on 24/04/2008 00:54:47 Question remains, why does it take more than 1 person(or a very specialized vessel like a huggin/rapier) to kill a nano ship? It doesn't, as people have mentioned COUNTLESS times and you have chosen to ignore, but even if it did, because this game is rock paper scissor. You chose Paper, bring your friend with rock, because the other guy chose scissor. There have definitely been ravens out there challenging any one ship to break its tank. So suck on your flame until smoke blows out your ass. Wtf are you talking about... lol --
Terraform Gallente Synthetic Frontiers	Posted - 2008.04.24 05:33:00 - [59] Originally by: Euriti "OMG I CANT WIN IN COOKIECUTTER HACK AND SLASH SETUP NERF NREF NREF NREF" Just no. Nanos add flavor to the game and more dynamic play. Nerfing nanos would also destroy Ishtar, Wow, this post takes the prize for being the most ********. First of all, Nanos ARE a cookiecutter setup, don't think it isn't! Second of all, yes, variety is good, but everyone and his cat is flying nano, so where's the variety? third, The ishtar was fine before nanos, i'm sure it'll be fine after it as well.
Zephyr Rengate Prophets Of a Damned Universe	Posted - 2008.04.24 06:39:00 - [60] Troll OP. Originally by: Jenny Spitfire I habe no life.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.