| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Riedle
Wayne's TV and Appliances
75
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 14:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
Seriously PeopleGǪ
I mean, itGÇÖs all well and good to express an opinion that is constructive, well thought out and logical.. However, the amount of vitriol, rhetoric and plain old GÇÿspoiled childGÇÖ syndrome expressed here is just silly.
It seems like every time CCP attempts to make changes to the game people rage over the littlest little thing and basically say that itGÇÖs their ball and they are going home. I mean, come on. The game has to change and only last summer people were asking CCP to concentrate on the spaceship aspects and now that they are altogether too many people are behaving like spoiled children here.
Overall, the skill tree changes are pretty minor and they are getting rid of the tiers GÇô something that any thinking player knows that needs to be done. There are going to be more viable ships to fly now and the Ray ButtGÇÖs of the game are going to come up with more fleet doctrines GÇô itGÇÖs going to be a good thing. Variety is good GÇô getting rid of the tiers is going to increase the variety of fleet compositions.
The skill tree changes are pretty minor and are logical in their approach. CCP has stated that while they are not sure on the nuts and bolts of the implementation in regards to the skill points, they have stated multiple times that you wonGÇÖt have to skill for ships that you can fly today GÇô so itGÇÖs all good.
So everyone relax and donGÇÖt be so resistant to change. What are we a bunch of cranky 85 year old bitter vets sitting on the porch polishing the shotgun warily watching the neighbourhood kids getting too close to the lawn or what?
So everyone relax and chill. And the ones who refuse to, please do us all a favour and rage about another game in a different forum.
Riedle
|

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
486
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 14:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'm not angry. Who's angry? disorientating |

Wilhelm Riley
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 14:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
rodyas wrote:I'm not angry. Who's angry?
I'M ANGRY!
I'm a paying customer which means my voice MUST be heard! I get a say in everything that happens with regards to development in EVE and I'm DISGUSTED that CCP didn't consult me first!
The changes are fine though, keep up the good work CCP. |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
513
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 14:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
i hate your face! -á"Nerf it cause I can't fly it". I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Wilhelm Riley
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 14:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lord Ryan wrote:i hate your face!
You ain't much to look at yourself bro. |

TheBlueMonkey
Natural Progression
84
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 14:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
You started in 2010, you should know how things work by now |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin
186
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 14:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
oh my god, controversy in a game that covers nearly all ages?
sacre bleu!
|

Grimpak
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
392
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 14:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
Muad 'dib wrote:oh my god, controversy in a game that covers nearly all ages?
sacre bleu!
mother of god. D: [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
513
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 15:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
Wilhelm Riley wrote:Lord Ryan wrote:i hate your face! You ain't much to look at yourself bro.
Get back in the kitchen. -á"Nerf it cause I can't fly it". I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Demolishar
The 57th Overlanders
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 16:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
We might as well demand to be compensated as well as possible for this instead of taking it lying down. Let's go over the ways this could hurt you.
- You trained BSV for the sole purpose of getting a cap. That's at least 30 days of wasted training you will never see back or get use from. - You trained assault frigates to get HACs. That's about 10 days for the pre-reqs and level 4 AF. - You trained covops to get recons. Again, 10 days of useless pre-reqs and covops 4. - You trained a cruiser 5 to be able to fly the CS of that race but had no interest in the cruisers of that race. 20 days wasted SP. - You trained logistics to be able to fly Fleet CS. Well damn, it won't require that anymore. Wasted SP.
Overall it's a LOT of potential waste to occur and I feel all the affected skills should be zeroed and reimbursed in full. |

Beckie DeLey
Brigade of Guards SpaceMonkey's Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 16:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
Demolishar wrote:We might as well demand to be compensated as well as possible for this instead of taking it lying down. Let's go over the ways this could hurt you.
- You trained BSV for the sole purpose of getting a cap. That's at least 30 days of wasted training you will never see back or get use from. - You trained assault frigates to get HACs. That's about 10 days for the pre-reqs and level 4 AF. - You trained covops to get recons. Again, 10 days of useless pre-reqs and covops 4. - You trained a cruiser 5 to be able to fly the CS of that race but had no interest in the cruisers of that race. 20 days wasted SP. - You trained logistics to be able to fly Fleet CS. Well damn, it won't require that anymore. Wasted SP.
Overall it's a LOT of potential waste to occur and I feel all the affected skills should be zeroed and reimbursed in full. I'm not against change as long as it doesn't set me back. But currently it's shaping up to do just that.
How the **** does that set you back? You still keep all your skills if you trained them. If you choose to not use them, it's your own private personal loss. The guy that trained BSV to get to Capitals...this change will not touch him. With or without the change, he can fly BS's at lvl V and Capitals at whatever level he had. It's The Legendary Extraordinary Me |

Valei Khurelem
409
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 16:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
The joke is a lot of these people claim they're adults, you'd think this would get rid of the stereotype of spoilt children by now, but no :P
"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP." -á - CCP Ytterbium |

Also Aswell
Apple Industries Inc. Surely You're Joking
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 16:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
Well said, Riedle.
Actually, I LIKE all the ragequits that are flying all over the place right now. Here's how I see it:
The players that scream, rant and ragequit over every change should just go. Quit. Go play some other game. If you're so inflexible and resist change then you're the last thing I need in my corp and alliance. I need players who can roll along, work with the rest of us as a team to get things done.
I LOVE these wholesale changes, mostly because it weeds out a bunch of poor players that weren't adding anything in the first place.
-AA |

Demolishar
The 57th Overlanders
238
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 16:24:00 -
[14] - Quote
Beckie DeLey wrote: How the **** does that set you back? You still keep all your skills if you trained them. If you choose to not use them, it's your own private personal loss. The guy that trained BSV to get to Capitals...this change will not touch him. With or without the change, he can fly BS's at lvl V and Capitals at whatever level he had.
It's funny how an expansion supposedly encouraging specialisation, sets back those of us who specialised in capital ships by effectively nullifying 30+ days of our training. I could have Fighters 5 by now, but nope, had to train now useless BSV. And of course, that's -ú30 of sub money wasted too. |

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
80
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 16:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
i for one approve of all proposed changes to the skill que although i would recomend CCP add at least 1 more T1 destroyer to make the destroyer class a bit more attractive to useing and skilling through.
as for the ship tiers dieing, i am all for it and cant wait for the ships to be properly balanced on ship role rather than ship teir.
folks who were bitching on the ship change dev blog never read through the whole thing anyway even when it said not only in the blog but SEVRAL times in the threadnaught that ensued that if you could fly it before hand you will be able to fly it afterwards also. |

Beckie DeLey
Brigade of Guards SpaceMonkey's Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 16:38:00 -
[16] - Quote
Demolishar wrote:Beckie DeLey wrote: How the **** does that set you back? You still keep all your skills if you trained them. If you choose to not use them, it's your own private personal loss. The guy that trained BSV to get to Capitals...this change will not touch him. With or without the change, he can fly BS's at lvl V and Capitals at whatever level he had.
It's funny how an expansion supposedly encouraging specialisation, sets back those of us who specialised in capital ships by effectively nullifying 30+ days of our training. I could have Fighters 5 by now, but nope, had to train now useless BSV. And of course, that's -ú30 of sub money wasted too.
So what you are saying is that you are not bitching about losing something but you are bitching about other people gaining some? That's some quality character traits you are displaying there, good sir. It's The Legendary Extraordinary Me |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
424
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 16:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
Beckie DeLey wrote:Demolishar wrote:Beckie DeLey wrote: How the **** does that set you back? You still keep all your skills if you trained them. If you choose to not use them, it's your own private personal loss. The guy that trained BSV to get to Capitals...this change will not touch him. With or without the change, he can fly BS's at lvl V and Capitals at whatever level he had.
It's funny how an expansion supposedly encouraging specialisation, sets back those of us who specialised in capital ships by effectively nullifying 30+ days of our training. I could have Fighters 5 by now, but nope, had to train now useless BSV. And of course, that's -ú30 of sub money wasted too. So what you are saying is that you are not bitching about losing something but you are bitching about other people gaining some? That's some quality character traits you are displaying there, good sir. He is bitching that he lost 30 days of training time taking BS to level 5 instead of 4, when he does not, and never did, intend to fly a BS. I happen to agree, because once I got into capships I said goodbye to BS, and I would never have trained BS to 5 even when I did fly them because I don't feel the bonus is worth 30 days on a ship I'm not gonna fly.
Guess I just have to look forward to Blops, unless that requirement is getting lowered too, in which case BS 5 is completely worthless to me. Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Johan Civire
Dirty Curse inc.
11
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:02:00 -
[18] - Quote
Riedle wrote:Seriously PeopleGǪ
I mean, itGÇÖs all well and good to express an opinion that is constructive, well thought out and logical.. However, the amount of vitriol, rhetoric and plain old GÇÿspoiled childGÇÖ syndrome expressed here is just silly.
It seems like every time CCP attempts to make changes to the game people rage over the littlest little thing and basically say that itGÇÖs their ball and they are going home. I mean, come on. The game has to change and only last summer people were asking CCP to concentrate on the spaceship aspects and now that they are altogether too many people are behaving like spoiled children here.
Overall, the skill tree changes are pretty minor and they are getting rid of the tiers GÇô something that any thinking player knows that needs to be done. There are going to be more viable ships to fly now and the Ray ButtGÇÖs of the game are going to come up with more fleet doctrines GÇô itGÇÖs going to be a good thing. Variety is good GÇô getting rid of the tiers is going to increase the variety of fleet compositions.
The skill tree changes are pretty minor and are logical in their approach. CCP has stated that while they are not sure on the nuts and bolts of the implementation in regards to the skill points, they have stated multiple times that you wonGÇÖt have to skill for ships that you can fly today GÇô so itGÇÖs all good.
So everyone relax and donGÇÖt be so resistant to change. What are we a bunch of cranky 85 year old bitter vets sitting on the porch polishing the shotgun warily watching the neighbourhood kids getting too close to the lawn or what?
So everyone relax and chill. And the ones who refuse to, please do us all a favour and rage about another game in a different forum.
Riedle
i agrea on that on bro but, can you stop the forum warriors here? no no you can not.
The rage is easy to explane. And difficult to mixs. Every old eve gamer like to fixs OLD and NEW bugs inside eve online.. The dont care about new STUFF. The want a FIXS. Now new players in the other hand want NEW STUFF. Like the WIS project. And thats the hole problem. CCP thinks we do all off this but when WIS update the feel like (old eve players) that the are forgotten. This is how the rage start... And many off us thinks we can say what we like but if you read the user agreement you know CCP do whatever the like to do on THERE game and the game is NOT US.
20000 people old eve players leave 20000 new players will play its marketing. Eve can stick with the old game or move on and try to get eve in a better view.... Sorry bad grammar iam not english not even close... |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
424
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote: 20000 people old eve players leave 20000 new players MIGHT play its marketing. Eve can stick with the old game or move on and try to get eve in a better view.... Sorry bad grammar iam not english not even close...
ftfy Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

TheBreadMuncher
Boxxed Up Industries
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:14:00 -
[20] - Quote
I've spotted at least five of the people on this thread claiming to be "mature adults" complaining about these updates... |

Johan Civire
Dirty Curse inc.
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:14:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Johan Civire wrote: 20000 people old eve players leave 20000 new players MIGHT play its marketing. Eve can stick with the old game or move on and try to get eve in a better view.... Sorry bad grammar iam not english not even close...
ftfy
Yah sorry
i try again : 20000 people old eve players MIGHT leave 20000 new players MIGHT play its marketing. Eve can stick with the old game or move on and try to get eve in a better view....
50/50 |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
425
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:23:00 -
[22] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Johan Civire wrote: 20000 people old eve players leave 20000 new players MIGHT play its marketing. Eve can stick with the old game or move on and try to get eve in a better view.... Sorry bad grammar iam not english not even close...
ftfy Yah sorry i try again : 20000 people old eve players MIGHT leave 20000 new players MIGHT play its marketing. Eve can stick with the old game or move on and try to get eve in a better view.... 50/50 Us old players are safe money. So they can take the yacht and dream vacation, or they can see whats in the box. Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Johan Civire
Dirty Curse inc.
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:32:00 -
[23] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Johan Civire wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:Johan Civire wrote: 20000 people old eve players leave 20000 new players MIGHT play its marketing. Eve can stick with the old game or move on and try to get eve in a better view.... Sorry bad grammar iam not english not even close...
ftfy Yah sorry i try again : 20000 people old eve players MIGHT leave 20000 new players MIGHT play its marketing. Eve can stick with the old game or move on and try to get eve in a better view.... 50/50 Us old players are safe money. So they can take the yacht and dream vacation, or they can see whats in the box.
Perhaps but you are not a ccp programmar or a ccp marketing manager you saying this because of your own view you can or never know what the stats are if the are realy old eve players stay or leave you will never know. Let me say this i agree on my point on any answers but CCP is the law for eve online even if you think you can change it you have it wrong, presidents do the same, some bad some good. |

Avid Bumhumper
Furian Necromongers
28
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:48:00 -
[24] - Quote
TheBreadMuncher wrote:I've spotted at least five of the people on this thread claiming to be "mature adults" complaining about these updates...
So "mature Adults" shouldn't complain?
CCP keeps trying to dumb the game down in order to make more money. That effect will likely upset a lot of older gamers who put in the effort only to find it was wasted.  Expecting them not to have an opinion about it in a "discussion forum" is kind of like saying "Here'e the keys to the car son, but you aren't allowed to drive it, you might do something unsafe...."
So by pointing out that "5 people" weren't mature enough to be mature, how did you add to the thread? Might want to take a look at your own attitude. Intelligent people generally don't go around pointing fingers at other people, they post their opinion and move on...
Dynamic Universe FTW.
|

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
425
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:51:00 -
[25] - Quote
Actually, my statement isn't really a push in either direction, its a statement of their choices. They can go with the safe money old player based or they can take a gamble, make moves that alienate the vets, and hope that it attracts new players.
Oh, wait, they already did that and nearly lost everything with Incarna.
If you look, they held off on changing course or even saying anything til it became clear that not only did taking the game in a bold new direction drive off their existing player base, it failed to get new players.
Fix the game, then add new stuff, in that order. The game is rather broken now because they spent years adding new stuff without fixing the old, and thats why we want a stop on all new stuff. CCP broke the game once already because of :change: Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Kiandoshia
Amarrian Retribution
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:55:00 -
[26] - Quote
People gonna be people. |

Patient 2428190
DEGRREE'Fo'FREE Internet Business School
103
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 18:01:00 -
[27] - Quote
Just because they hinted at ship tiers being removed doesn't exonerate the skill changes from being ill-conceived and worthless.
As for ship tiers, CCP has no problems promising you everything and then walking away to chase something else shiny. Wait until you see it. |

Riedle
Wayne's TV and Appliances
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 19:41:00 -
[28] - Quote
Avid Bumhumper wrote:TheBreadMuncher wrote:I've spotted at least five of the people on this thread claiming to be "mature adults" complaining about these updates... So "mature Adults" shouldn't complain? CCP keeps trying to dumb the game down in order to make more money. That effect will likely upset a lot of older gamers who put in the effort only to find it was wasted.  Expecting them not to have an opinion about it in a "discussion forum" is kind of like saying "Here'e the keys to the car son, but you aren't allowed to drive it, you might do something unsafe...."
Mature adults can complain but the complaints should be based upon facts. People are STILL complaining about these changes making them have to train things up that they can already fly today despite CCP stating multiple times that this would not be the case.
We have a couple of nimrods in here complaining about BSV or Assauly Ship V or whatever. Tough. You have it. You will always have it and I don't think you should be 'reimbursed' for that.
I'm training Gal BS V right now and am not changing that. It's good to have in it's own right. I'm an older player and like this change so you don't speak for me. There is nothing here that is dumbing down anything. There is going to be more variety and a lot more cap explosions. Nothing bad there in my opinion. |

Riedle
Wayne's TV and Appliances
82
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 19:42:00 -
[29] - Quote
Patient 2428190 wrote:Just because they hinted at ship tiers being removed doesn't exonerate the skill changes from being ill-conceived and worthless.
As for ship tiers, CCP has no problems promising you everything and then walking away to chase something else shiny. Wait until you see it.
They didn't hint at them being removed. They said that they were going to be removed.
How are the skill changes ill-conceived and worthless exactly? Because you say so? Because you are mad?
Nope. Sorry |

JitaPriceChecker2
State War Academy Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 20:33:00 -
[30] - Quote
Well removing bs5 as prereq kinda sucks, indeed cap pilot could have invested those skills oint in something more useful |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |