Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
squishinator
Unknown Soldiers Chaos Incarnate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.05 05:49:00 -
[91]
Edited by: squishinator on 05/08/2008 05:49:43 <-- give isky plz
seriously, empire war is like this, if U're out numbered, sensible thing to do is to wait for the chance that U can deal damage to the other side, not to have a head on fight then gets pwnd. Still looking forward to that good fight.
second thought, since I got primaried in the last fight, give isky plz
|
Aesheera
Amarr Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.05 10:37:00 -
[92]
Truth, Empire wars can be like this.
We, as you know Squish, arent too chickensh1t to engage when we're outnumbered and we have a higher % of succes when engaging such fleets then losing them. You win some, you lose some - thats life, especially in EVE.
/rant off.
Final note - WE ARE ACCEPTING CONTRACTS AGAIN.
For pricing and/or performance info, feel free to drop me a mail or convo.
|
SgtLeon
|
Posted - 2008.08.05 13:35:00 -
[93]
Originally by: Niedervol Dear Nightcrew:
Stop flaming our recruitment thread. Make a new thread, or chat us in game, or something besides having nerd rage in our threads. Yes, I realize this could apply to both sides atm, and I'm only speaking for one. Trolling is forbidden in recruitment threads, anyway.
Thank you.
Honestly, I wouldn't call it flaming. They are just bringing some issues up from their experience fighting ya and I can relate to that. Since were talking about it, smack talking is frown upon in local. If you do it too much, you'll end up as a certain person I know quite well... I'll give you a clue. He flies a Rapier.
Other then that, War Panda is hungry for some kills.
|
Dickens Cider
NightCrew
|
Posted - 2008.08.05 15:38:00 -
[94]
Originally by: Niedervol Dear Nightcrew:
Stop flaming our recruitment thread. Make a new thread, or chat us in game, or something besides having nerd rage in our threads. Yes, I realize this could apply to both sides atm, and I'm only speaking for one. Trolling is forbidden in recruitment threads, anyway.
Thank you.
Then move your thread to the proper channel - i.e. Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center?
You're welcome
|
Tchell Dahhn
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2008.08.05 15:52:00 -
[95]
Originally by: ****ens Cider Then move your thread to the proper channel - i.e. Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center?
He might have meant this thread for their Merc Services, however, as I understand, there are no rules for flaming in such a thread.
Thanks for pointing out the obvious, however.
Bumping for Malum Crusis goodness.
We're Recruiting! |
omgea fatuus
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 09:09:00 -
[96]
My two cents as it were...been dec'ed by mc. was not impressed. hunting solo miners was effective, if you want guranteed kills on defenseless. a gate camp or 3, well what ambush dosen't work to get you kills? nice & pretty T2 ships all around, so good pew pew against T1's...when I did see even numbers against them, they ran. maby it was time for them to go to bed. dont care realy. did a lot of my people stay docked? yep. out gunned miners and new players have no reason to throw away their hard earned ships over someone elses bitter hireing of mercs for whatever. but hey, it's eve. alls fair in war right? again, just My 2cents. talk about a funny thing to read at work :-P
|
Tchell Dahhn
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 12:44:00 -
[97]
Originally by: omgea fatuus Holy Wall O' Text!
So, you were not impressed by the fact that they were effective at
a) flying well put-together fleets, b) keeping you camped in station, and c) killing your ships regardless of the tactics? I think you meant to say you were bumping them for their effectiveness, because your giant blob tells the story quite well.
We're Recruiting! |
Aesheera
Amarr Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 16:27:00 -
[98]
Originally by: omgea fatuus ..when I did see even numbers against them, they ran.
Name me ONE (as in 1, one single event) when we EVER ran from your lot? I remember me flying a Hyperion alone, taking on SIX of your lot (including a Battleship on your side) killing 3 and sending the rest off either burning or fleeing while I didnt even break armor.
You better get your facts straight before running your mouth in this here thread boy. Talk about THAT being funny to read.
|
Niedervol
Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 16:36:00 -
[99]
Don't mind me, its not actually a recruitment thread. That's elsewhere. I would call it a typo, but its properly spelled
Also, to set things straight, Demio's was in the habit of running, since they couldn't field what we could (strangely, considering their numbers). Nothing wrong with it, we just did our job as contracted. If they want to run, well that's their choice. Only a complete idiot sticks around in a fight with 0% chance of winning or inflicting any damage...
|
Niedervol
Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 16:39:00 -
[100]
Originally by: Aesheera Edited by: Aesheera on 06/08/2008 16:37:19
Originally by: omgea fatuus ..when I did see even numbers against them, they ran.
Name me ONE (as in 1, one single event) when we EVER ran from your lot? I remember me taking on SIX of your lot (including a Battleship on your side) killing 3 and sending the rest off either burning or fleeing while I didnt even break armor.
Talk facts or dont talk at all.
I would have frapsed this, but I only got to see the aftermath
|
|
omgea fatuus
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 18:53:00 -
[101]
amusing. as for numbers i refered to, 4 vs 4, a 6 vs 6, were ones i recall witnessing. and no i'm not in the habit of logging such things. as for being effective, that would be based off the terms of their contract. which theit stated goal to us was not accoplished. maby what was told was just smoke, dont know or care. was just refering to the running thing listed above.
"So, you were not impressed by the fact that they were effective at
a) flying well put-together fleets, (4 ships aint a fleet or well put together when T2s are abushing indys) b) keeping you camped in station, and (yep, some people stayed docked, some didn't. personal choice) c) killing your ships regardless of the tactics?" (again, having a bigger gun dont mean haveing any tactics)
oh i do recall 3 of you jump/running from 4 or 5 of us. sadly all the fights i was ever there for were one sided. command ships do tend to kick the snot out of cruisers.
as for corp numbers, we all know about alts and random people that dont play much. miners & traders never fight anyway.
seems you get very upset at what i saw, hmmm. truth stings dont it.
anyway, go back to your bickering. i find it very amusing.
|
Aesheera
Amarr Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 19:21:00 -
[102]
Originally by: omgea fatuus
oh i do recall 3 of you jump/running from 4 or 5 of us. sadly all the fights i was ever there for were one sided. command ships do tend to kick the snot out of cruisers. as for corp numbers, we all know about alts and random people that dont play much. miners & traders never fight anyway.
You never fielded anything to make us run. Not only that, even the corp that decced us to assist you never showed up, so we helped them a hand to find us.
Your fleets never showed, we even asked you to get going. Well, once they did to battle me solo. The result is frapsed however, and your entire fleet bailed after seeing your stabbed battleship go down too quick and having your assistance go down as well.
Originally by: omgea fatuus seems you get very upset at what i saw, hmmm. truth stings dont it. anyway, go back to your bickering. i find it very amusing.
Amused is the proper term, since none of your claims hold any form of truth.
|
omgea fatuus
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 22:38:00 -
[103]
amused, past tense. amuseing, current tense.
and i wasn't there for every event. i only reported on the ones i was there for. and i did see you and or your people run at least once to even numbers from us. i dont bother making videos of games i play. that always seemed a little silly to me.
and i still find it very amuseing how irritated you seem to get at a simple truth of my reporting what i saw. and since i know you were not personly involved in every little event between us you can't claim your people didn't run at some point. again, i only saw it once so be happy and relax.
but i do thank you for continueing to be so very amuseing to me. it makes then long duty days on the boat with no game go by so much faster...
|
Aesheera
Amarr Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 23:14:00 -
[104]
Current and future tense will be getting more amusing.
|
omgea fatuus
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 00:21:00 -
[105]
so off topic, i know how much you hate that, but you seem to spend a lot of time in the forum thread. not in game hunting or just taking a break? so i noticed a lot of ammar ships from you all. just like the style? or making good use of those armor tanks?
|
Stauner
Caldari Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 01:25:00 -
[106]
Originally by: omgea fatuus so off topic, i know how much you hate that, but you seem to spend a lot of time in the forum thread. not in game hunting or just taking a break? so i noticed a lot of ammar ships from you all. just like the style? or making good use of those armor tanks?
Thanks for your observation, our favourite ship is the thorax... Please reflect upon that.
|
omgea fatuus
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 01:29:00 -
[107]
oh is it now? i only reacall seeing one. i did see several ammar ships over and over again, intys and command ships. maby i was just lucky enough, or unlucky? to see the same people over and over...i did see quiet a few people in ammar ships. but the thorax dose seem to have pvp written all over it.
|
Stauner
Caldari Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 01:31:00 -
[108]
Originally by: omgea fatuus oh is it now? i only reacall seeing one. i did see several ammar ships over and over again, intys and command ships. maby i was just lucky enough, or unlucky? to see the same people over and over...i did see quiet a few people in ammar ships. but the thorax dose seem to have pvp written all over it.
Yes... finding condoms for it is really difficult.
|
Terra Mikael
NightCrew
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 02:51:00 -
[109]
Originally by: Aesheera its really not worth replying to nonsense anymore.
Nonsense!? THIS...IS...SPAAAARTA!!!
Originally by: VicturusTeSaluto All piracy is built upon honoring one's word.
|
Zansin
Minmatar Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 04:00:00 -
[110]
gf to all chaos involved in the last few days
free bump :)
|
|
Sol'Kanar
Minmatar NightCrew
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 12:41:00 -
[111]
Originally by: omgea fatuus amused, past tense. amuseing, current tense.
Today, Sol'Kanar teaches third grade English! Gather round everyone!
It's spelled "amusing" not "amuseing". "Amusing" is the gerund form of "Amuse". A gerund is like the noun-form of a verb. Because it is considered a noun, it has no notion of time.
Here are some examples for you to read -
Past Tense - "What you posted was very amusing." Present Tense - "Your post is very amusing." Future Tense - "I hope your next post will be equally amusing."
In all three tenses, the word "amusing" was used.
(Sorry, I couldn't help myself.)
|
Tchell Dahhn
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 12:51:00 -
[112]
Edited by: Tchell Dahhn on 07/08/2008 12:51:41
Originally by: omgea fatuus 4 ships aint a fleet or well put together when T2s are abushing indys
How many ships do make up a Fleet, oh Wise One? I do believe one could create a Fleet having only two ships, so I fail to comprehend your math.
As to 'well put together', I do believe that T2 Ships ambushing Industrials would do quite the impeccable job of blowing them up, so I'd say that was pretty well put together, wouldn't you? I've seen more than one Indy put out as bait, so you're damn right I'd be flying my best ships, ready for the ambush.
Originally by: omgea fatuus again, having a bigger gun dont mean haveing any tactics
Actually, that would be "Important Tactic Number One" in my book. Only a fool knowingly walks into a fight where the odds are against them winning.
Originally by: omgea fatuus oh i do recall 3 of you jump/running from 4 or 5 of us. sadly all the fights i was ever there for were one sided. command ships do tend to kick the snot out of cruisers.
Read more. I'm not even in their Corp. My Corporation was a victim of their work, and I'm giving them the appreciation they deserve.
For anyone reading this who is considering hiring Malum Crusis for Mercenary Services, take note. They do a good job, and if the comments of Omygod Fatass, above, give you any clue, they have a pretty good method of extracting Carebear Tears as well.
Recommended, with my respect.
We're Recruiting! |
omgea fatuus
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 20:02:00 -
[113]
oh no tears here, but thanks for caring. i do apologize for my poor spelling. I am glad you can find such fun from my chosen moniker for this game. best not to try and type up a name at 3am eh? i am amused as how much feelings my postings have stirred up. almost like this forum means something other than web page its typed on... is this all you really have to worry about?
well to each their own, on opinions at least. i'm sure you all know the old saying about opinions and *******s...
dance oh electronic marionettes. dance to the tug of strings you can not feel or see. the play must go on and players must play their parts lest the audience lose interest and seek amusement at another of the fine fine theaters here abouts.
|
Aesheera
Amarr Malum Crusis
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 10:47:00 -
[114]
One slot left for contracts at this moment.
For info just look me up ingame.
|
Terra Mikael
NightCrew
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 11:09:00 -
[115]
Originally by: Aesheera One slot left for contracts at this moment.
Could I hire you to kill Malum Crutches? I should be easy since I hear they live nearby...
Originally by: VicturusTeSaluto All piracy is built upon honoring one's word.
|
FU22
Beyond Transcendence
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 11:46:00 -
[116]
Originally by: Terra Mikael
Originally by: Aesheera One slot left for contracts at this moment.
Could I hire you to kill Malum Crutches? I should be easy since I hear they live nearby...
ermm....am i the only one who thought that wasn't funny in the slightest?
|
Tchell Dahhn
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 12:06:00 -
[117]
Originally by: FU22 ermm....am i the only one who thought that wasn't funny in the slightest?
Nope. You're not.
ITT: A Player who fails to extract lulz from copying my idea of making fun of a Player/Corp's Name.
We're Recruiting! |
Terra Mikael
NightCrew
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 14:42:00 -
[118]
But i kinda chuckled to myself, so at least one person laughed. And dood I so didn't steal any ideas, I got it from my half-baked spell checker and decided to keep it, so there =P
Originally by: VicturusTeSaluto All piracy is built upon honoring one's word.
|
Malande
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 14:45:00 -
[119]
Laughing at your own jokes != Good comedy
|
Sol'Kanar
Minmatar NightCrew
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 15:21:00 -
[120]
Originally by: Tchell Dahhn ITT: A Player who fails to extract lulz from copying my idea of making fun of a Player/Corp's Name.
ok ok, I wanna try! "Suddenly Nincompewps" No, that's not funny. "Suddenly Ninnies" Close, but ninny may suffer generation gap recognition. How about, "Suddenly Derailed a Merc Thread"? No, too long. Man, I got nothin'.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |