Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cassandra Beckinsale
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 00:08:00 -
[781]
Nano Nerf is absolutely good. I would love if it is even nerfed more.
In my opinion, MWD also need some cap usage increase and more CPU use.
|
Nozaro
Section 3
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 00:41:00 -
[782]
Against
|
Terell
Princeps Corp T e r c i o s
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 01:09:00 -
[783]
Edited by: Terell on 28/07/2008 01:08:58 the dev giveth and the dev taketh .... its easy and plane
who said nerff ?? .... i would say balancing
i would like to see what will u say if i had 3 differents tracking modules without penalty that make me able to hit any nanoship.
go go go, devs, its time to balance the game.
|
Sunsayeach
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 01:09:00 -
[784]
Edited by: Sunsayeach on 28/07/2008 01:12:32 Edited by: Sunsayeach on 28/07/2008 01:10:36 Against
|
Sunsayeach
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 01:10:00 -
[785]
Edited by: Sunsayeach on 28/07/2008 01:10:55
|
Vladez
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 01:14:00 -
[786]
i am agenst the nano nerf.... buy doing that you make most mini ships useless.....
|
Ne0 MaTrIx
omen. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 01:14:00 -
[787]
SAVE THE NANOS!!!!!!!!! ---
|
Spurty
Caldari Trader's Academy Blue Sky Consortium
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 01:29:00 -
[788]
Edited by: Spurty on 28/07/2008 01:29:25 signed
and CCP, please introduce NEW CONTENT. Leave the Universe alone!
Morphing the Universe is the stuff of Hollywood and Time Traveler movies (Cue Claud Van-Driver).
There just is no way to roll this out without breaking people's "suspension of disbelief".
Whats next? Removal of an entire classification of ship?
Concerning ANY and EVERY nerf past, present and future:
I urge you to think about it a bit more and then if you can't dream up a storyline for the nerf, don't do it!
Surely the scientists and engineers of EVE might have put their heads together and produced some new weaponry to thwart the threat?
At least its BELIEVABLE and some STORY driven from its conception!
I'm not a role player, but I do appreciate a backstory existing to bolster and flesh out what exists in a Universe. -- Two prostitutes standing on a street corner. One says to the other, "Have you ever been picked up by the fuzz?" The other replies, "No, but I've been swung around by the ****!" |
Wil Stryker
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 02:05:00 -
[789]
Edited by: Wil Stryker on 28/07/2008 02:06:10 Against
There are counters to nanos as can be seen on many killboards.
Current proposed changes will tilt the battle towards a larger group.
|
Kasamatsu
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 02:12:00 -
[790]
|
|
MrAssasin
Error666 Devils Rising
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 02:18:00 -
[791]
THIS IS CRAZY. THIS NERF WILL HURT THE GAME MORE THEN HELP. ALOT OF MINMTAR SHIP WILL BE CRAP NOW :(
|
Drgnvale
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 02:40:00 -
[792]
I support the changes to polycarbon engine housings to be in-line with other speed rigs, and support in general the lowering of maximum speeds (we don't need a linear speed decrease, just adjust the far edge of the curve down a bit), but the rest of that devblog is pure horseshit.
|
Mobvious Dammage
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 03:16:00 -
[793]
Going fast is just to much fun.
|
Yuri VanKaer
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 03:31:00 -
[794]
While I support the spirit behind the proposed changes, I don't support the changes themselves. I'd rather see new items/skills added to provide better counters, rather than cross-the-board ner***e.
|
gtcsellalt
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 03:35:00 -
[795]
Edited by: gtcsellalt on 28/07/2008 03:36:20
|
Lt Jester
Shade.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 03:37:00 -
[796]
AGAINST!
|
VanDam
Shade.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 03:38:00 -
[797]
Against the nanonerf
|
Sorrowed
Shade.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 03:42:00 -
[798]
Against.
|
Vilhelm
Hippie Haters
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 03:45:00 -
[799]
Against
|
Zarowka
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 03:51:00 -
[800]
Full support
|
|
xh'duality
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 04:00:00 -
[801]
Want more speed hehe --------------------------------------------------- It take's 10 finger's for to smacktalk and ONLY ONE TO WIN [The all mighty "I WIN BOTTON"] |
Baaldor
Igneus Auctorita GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 04:20:00 -
[802]
Against nerf.
|
memphistopheles
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 04:28:00 -
[803]
Against
|
Shardrael
Caldari AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 04:39:00 -
[804]
against.
|
Mikhalio
KIA Corp KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 04:46:00 -
[805]
Against.
Reiterating a good 'poast' on the topic:
Edited by: Areo Hotah on 25/07/2008 13:18:08 I am on the receiving end of (AAA) nano-hacs daily. I have had an invasion of the old TRI in my space.
Observations from me fighting nano gangs: -nobody takes booster pills -Claymores are quite rare to see, and tend do die a lot. -Hardly anyone uses snakes -There are plenty of ways to kill (part of) a nanogang, without everybody being in a Rapier or Huginn. They bring a specialized ship to do something, so you have to do something specialized to counter them. Nothing wrong with that. No standard gang (some inties, ewar and DPS) should be able to counter 95% of enemy gang types. Eve should be rock-paper-scissors -I like fighting them. Some people have even begun to count their kills in polycarbs/week.
I think there is nothing wrong with HACs going 3-5km/s.
I think there is nothing wrong with players investing 1Bn isk in snakes and going 8km/s.
I agree there is something wrong that practically every single HAC can go faster than a standard fitted inty.
There is nothing wrong with having speeds that makes you more or less immune to missiles and drones. These offensive weapons take minimal player skill to use (hence their popularity for mission runners), while good players can avoid the damage of turrets, simply by manual piloting (and vice versa, a good player in a turret boat can maximize his damage potential). A better solution would be to have significantly reduced damage, but not 0, for hurling missiles and drones at fast targets.
I think you should never ever nerf warfare links, as they are really a team-based module, and nerfing decreases the incentive to field one is bad. A good nano gang has a Claymore, so they go even faster. So what? Kill the Claymore first.
Nerfing all at once is bad (damps anyone?). Just start by adjusting the polycarbs to be worse than t2 nanofibers, and modify the 3 "speed" stats (mass, max velocity, agility) into 2, so more stacking penalties get applied.
Making warp scramblers useful is good (maybe do something with warpcore stabs too).
Changing a web from 90% to 60% is a 400% nerf (max speed of webbed target from 10% to 40%); nothing in the history of eve has been nerfed so hard.
Once again, I fear that the Devs are listening too much to whines, without seeing the real problem. I think they should have focussed their time solely on their last "mission statement": Guerrilla warfare must remain a viable combat tactic. Please make more ways to make this possible, than simply nano'ing it up.
Cause: Skilled players should be better than defending blob in crap ships. Skilled defenders should be able to beat cookie-cutter setups.
Areo
|
Mara Rinn
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 05:12:00 -
[806]
You can still fly fast with the nerf, just not game-breakingly fast.
|
Arcane Carnage
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 05:57:00 -
[807]
AGAINST ALOT! -
Illuminati - Pathetic Legion
Ures truly kickin' ass Carn |
teji
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 05:57:00 -
[808]
People were actually having fun playing eve online. This was obviously not intended.
|
Serial ATA
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 06:00:00 -
[809]
against
|
Toon33
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 06:03:00 -
[810]
Against.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |