Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Steel Tigeress
Gallente Steel-Wolfs
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:04:00 -
[1081]
Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:45 Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:13
Originally by: AdmiralFreeman
Originally by: Yaay my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure
Think twice before speaking. You can only support the vote with one char per payed account.
Wrong, the CSM's just have a way of seeing how many accounts accually voted, and not characters.
There is nothing that limits the number of characters you /sign in this thread with. Since there are 3 characters per account, it is perfectly feasable for there to only be 13 pages of actual votes against this nerf.
Judging from the ammount of alts I've spotted where 3 people in a row look the exact same, or 2-3 in a row have the same name with different spellings. I'ld say this thread actually only has around 20 somthing pages of actual votes.
|
Jenna Trueman
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:07:00 -
[1082]
AGAINST!
|
Ilovepoasting
Richard Cheese dedication corp
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:10:00 -
[1083]
Originally by: Yaay my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure
ohey Mr bs ops for life!
|
Kurt Hetfield
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:12:00 -
[1084]
Against!
|
Jade Constantine
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:15:00 -
[1085]
Originally by: Steel Tigeress Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:45 Edited by: Steel Tigeress on 29/07/2008 17:04:13
Originally by: AdmiralFreeman
Originally by: Yaay my god, 300 people and their 500 alts all voting against, go figure
Think twice before speaking. You can only support the vote with one char per payed account.
Wrong, the CSM's just have a way of seeing how many accounts accually voted, and not characters.
There is nothing that limits the number of characters you /sign in this thread with. Since there are 3 characters per account, it is perfectly feasable for there to only be 13 pages of actual votes against this nerf.
Judging from the ammount of alts I've spotted where 3 people in a row look the exact same, or 2-3 in a row have the same name with different spellings. I'ld say this thread actually only has around 20 somthing pages of actual votes.
Of course thats going to be exactly the same for the pro nerf thread as well so its something of a null argument.
Star Fraction | Dare to Dream!
|
sajberk
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:29:00 -
[1086]
Edited by: sajberk on 29/07/2008 17:33:44 no speed nerf pls!
|
Red Raider
Caldari Airbourne Demons
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:34:00 -
[1087]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Of course thats going to be exactly the same for the pro nerf thread as well so its something of a null argument.
I only voted once their Jade. Though I don't agree with some of the parts of the nerf the Dev mentioned I agree a change needs to be made.
A happy gamer isnt on the forums, they are playing the game unless they have an idea that they honestly think is helping out. |
Will Rose
Wise Guys Exquisite Malevolence
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:36:00 -
[1088]
I am not against a reduction in the effectiveness of Nano ships - for the longest time I did my best to make do without a 'nano' ship in small gang PVP and was quickly educated in just how impossible they were to do without. There are counters to nano, yes - but they are particularly resource intensive in terms of specific skills, modules and ships - much more so nanoing - they only lead down the slippery slope towards blobsville, which is not a place I want to go.
What is needed isn't a broad nerf of everything nano, what is needed is a balanced consideration of what the problems are with the tracking, explosion radius system etc. as well as the more extreme ends of the Nano scale, and a proper rebalancing. Perhaps consider modules like webification fields, or remote area webs, just as there are remote area ECM mods.
I support the principle of the thing - ridiculous speeds need to be brought back into line (or weapons need to be properly worked out so that they still have some effect at speeds), but not the scale of the proposed nerfs, so I vote against.
|
Jade Constantine
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:37:00 -
[1089]
Originally by: Red Raider
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Of course thats going to be exactly the same for the pro nerf thread as well so its something of a null argument.
I only voted once their Jade. Though I don't agree with some of the parts of the nerf the Dev mentioned I agree a change needs to be made.
I imagine plenty of perfectly honest players only voted in this thread once too. Point was that extreme frothers on both sides of the argument will multiple post with their alts as a general rule.
Star Fraction | Dare to Dream!
|
ZedLey
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:38:00 -
[1090]
Against.
|
|
shibby5114
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:55:00 -
[1091]
Edited by: shibby5114 on 29/07/2008 17:55:27 against!
|
Martin Mckenna
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:55:00 -
[1092]
nerf nanos
---------------------------------------------
|
Atsuko Ratu
VSP Corp.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:57:00 -
[1093]
against stupid design decisions.
|
Pegas
Demonic Corp G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 17:58:00 -
[1094]
Against. |
cmd icecube
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:00:00 -
[1095]
Against
|
Wojak Szwejk
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:01:00 -
[1096]
Against
|
Zbuntowany Kaloryfer
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:02:00 -
[1097]
AGAINST
|
Rozbity Termometr
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:03:00 -
[1098]
AGAINST
|
Zakrecony Termos
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:03:00 -
[1099]
AGAINST
|
Wstyd mi
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:04:00 -
[1100]
AGAINST
|
|
Narzeczona Bosmana
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:05:00 -
[1101]
Against
|
Pani Zuzia
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:05:00 -
[1102]
AGAINST
|
Arlenna Molatov
Caldari The 59th Parallel
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:11:00 -
[1103]
Wow, look at ALL these alts!!! Its too bad all the alts don't count :)
|
Tearavygh Quillam
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:16:00 -
[1104]
AGAINST
|
Luna DeRossa
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:16:00 -
[1105]
AGAINST definitly !
|
recco02
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:18:00 -
[1106]
AGAINST
Small gang warfare must prevail.
|
Insaki
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:18:00 -
[1107]
AGAINST
Kill the blob
|
xDOTHEDEWx
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:22:00 -
[1108]
SUPPORT
|
Dieneykes
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:40:00 -
[1109]
Against.
|
Dieneykes
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 18:41:00 -
[1110]
Originally by: Arlenna Molatov Wow, look at ALL these alts!!! Its too bad all the alts don't count :)
Too bad you don't actually know how the voting mechanism works.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |