Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Duran Bolivar
Free-Space-Ranger Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 01:34:00 -
[1651]
against
|
Rjindael
Free-Space-Ranger Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 01:34:00 -
[1652]
against
|
DarkArch0n X
Free-Space-Ranger Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 01:36:00 -
[1653]
Against the nerf
|
Secluse
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 02:10:00 -
[1654]
Edited by: Secluse on 06/08/2008 02:10:05 Against
|
Phaedruss
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 03:05:00 -
[1655]
Nerf extreme speeds, trash the ideas in the Dev Blog, and find some people with a clue to come up with ideas before publishing them.
Against THIS nerf.
|
Kobrakilla
Eternal Perseverance
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 04:10:00 -
[1656]
Unprepared should always equal dead |
Cun
Caldari Risky eXplosion Death or Glory
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 05:21:00 -
[1657]
Against WBR, Cun |
Hitryi Kot
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 05:46:00 -
[1658]
Against
|
Loony Hypo
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 08:51:00 -
[1659]
|
evildotcom
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 08:52:00 -
[1660]
|
|
Mauy Thai
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 08:54:00 -
[1661]
gimps way too many ships, and basically it just seems lazy.
|
Milamar Tokugawa
Care-a-lot
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 08:55:00 -
[1662]
Down with minnie nerfs!
|
eliminator2
Black Water.
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 09:23:00 -
[1663]
every1 is moaning that there is not away to kill them on ur own i kill them on mmy own easy in a BS i have my own techneak that gets rid of any of em plus theres the rapier/mugin that can web em to death not to mention the jammin/dampin ships that can jam or damp the inty/nano*** i mean i read the blog and it was like mmm gd up to now then i go to the bit to nerf all ships speed hmmm abit over top but ill carry on readin then theres the drones that can catch nano/***s y even bother doing that nano***s kill the enemy ships drones anyway so thats pointless and then the web nerf WAY over the top i mean u dnt exactly have any nanoer thatr comes to ur web range and wen they do they get out easy at it is and with web nerf u might as well just not carry one since all other ships if ur gate campin will just get to get easyier even a freighter could get to gate faster now i bet lol :D and then the short range scram boost all MWD's will be made inactive if u get hit by these WTF they have 7,500m range (i think) no nano *** will ever go that close in first place let alone 10 km and even if they do they just do wat they did with the web go fling out i mean sure the mwd gets turned of but base speed much even with web it will still be faster than a BS and i bet the inty/nano*** will carry one just incase the bs trys MWD to them or any other nano*** trys it so over all CCP has yet failed at another nerf
P.S sorry about the crap typing i aint a gd speller lol
|
Tonkin
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 10:31:00 -
[1664]
against
|
Rijasy
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:19:00 -
[1665]
Against.
|
midge Mo'yb
Antares Shipyards Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 11:28:00 -
[1666]
against, -----------------------------------------------
|
Typhado3
Ashen Lion Mining and Production Consortium Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 12:19:00 -
[1667]
against the minmatar being kicked in the nuts again and again yes
|
Enigmaria
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 13:15:00 -
[1668]
Signed because of Gallente and Minnie getting screwed over.
|
AdmiralFreeman
Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 13:25:00 -
[1669]
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Originally by: AdmiralFreeman Edited by: AdmiralFreeman on 04/08/2008 13:28:34 Edited by: AdmiralFreeman on 04/08/2008 12:59:10
Originally by: Jade Constantine
Was raised in today's CSM meeting - discussion ensued - chatlog is Vote on nano-nerf statement at 16:45
Feel free to have a read about what was said.
Very dissapointed in the CSM !!!! You are considering your own opinions on the subject over the input generated by the Pro-Con the vote/poll. I tought your mission was to voice the feeling of the community not your own??? AGAINST / PRO NERF = 2/1 I think its clear !!!
You seem to think that we all just vote pro-con without trying it out on sisi. Well you are wrong, I think there are plenty of posts with concrete evidence that this nerf is bad, and will eliminate a certain type of warfare as it is no longer a viable option with the proposed changes.
CCP seems to think that all Nano pilots use HG snakes and use T2 poly's on. I think they can find out, if they wanted to, on how many pilots acutally use this type's of mods and implants in actual combat. But I'm convinced it will be a minorty. The typical nano pilot is using T1 poly's, T2 nano's and overdrives, and maybe a low cost speed mod implant. This is what should be looked into that the typical setup by most nano pilots remains a viable option. Not nerf everything that the ridicilous stuff that most can't offord remains a half baked solution.
Go do your job CSM !!!! The vote tells you exactly what you should do !!!!
Well I've added the speed nerf Issue to the agenda again for the August 17th meeting and urged all the CSM delegates to make the effort to get onto SISI for the two intervening weeks so we can hopefully have a more useful discussion at the next meeting. Fingers crossed we get something more useful from the next one.
For the record: Jade, Omber Zombie, Ben Derider, Ank voted for a statement on the nano nerf last meeting. Bane Glorious, Darius Johnson, Inanna and Tusko Hopkins voted against. If you feel that any of the CSM delegates who would ordinarily be representing your interests on this issue have made a mistake then I'd advise you to evemail, convo, or otherwise engage them in discussion and let them know what you think.
Thanks for your efforts Jade, its appreciated. Keep on pushing !!!
To the other CSM members : I think the message given by the vote is pretty clear, so I don't understand why you are reluctant on voicing the results of the vox-populi ? Invoking the fact that the proposed changes are still subject to change is b***s**t. You know as well as I, that if we don't act now, the nerf is going to happen. So get in the frontline and act based on the votes!!
Also unsure what some of your CSM members(-1), that voted against the CSM putting something forward are going to test on sisi. As they seem to have close to no KB stats / proven combat experience, or display any relevant pre nerf pvp experience..... or does being in csm mean that you are defacto experts on small gang warfare and tactics ?
If they would have been pre-occupied by the upcomming changes they would already have tested is on sisi the day it was released. don't you think so ?
|
Falun Assad
Shadows of the Dead Daisho Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 15:34:00 -
[1670]
Against, in this current state it is simply to much!
Tweaking instead of breacking please!
|
|
Sol'Kanar
NightCrew
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 16:02:00 -
[1671]
Against
|
Xavieer Naidoo
Oberon Incorporated Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 16:39:00 -
[1672]
AGAINST the nano/blasterboat nerf.
|
Bobbechk
Vigilante inc.
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 17:12:00 -
[1673]
Against!
|
Xavier Zedicus
Priory of Zorrabed
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 17:36:00 -
[1674]
Edited by: Xavier Zedicus on 06/08/2008 17:36:51
|
burning raven
omen. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 19:07:00 -
[1675]
Against
.!. CCP 4TL
|
Corin Nebulon
Naqam
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 19:11:00 -
[1676]
against the nerf /signed
|
edtheshed
Most Wanted INC G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 19:24:00 -
[1677]
against!!!!!!!!!!
|
DNSSauce
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 19:29:00 -
[1678]
AGAINST
|
Kirex
Vale Heavy Industries Molotov Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 20:01:00 -
[1679]
k
|
Dante Tucker
|
Posted - 2008.08.06 20:12:00 -
[1680]
This is my vote, there are many like it. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |