| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Trojanman190
D00M.
Triumvirate.
   |
Posted - 2008.08.07 19:25:00 -
[1711]
Edited by: Trojanman190 on 07/08/2008 19:26:02
 Originally by: Steyr Daghan
I'm for the balancing of ludicrus speed, absolutely. That means "yes to the nerf" if you didn't get it.
All of you here are just whining because you'll get no more safe, free kills.
The proposed changes will bring a new life to pvp in eve. And it's way, way, way overdue.
I hope CCP won't cave to the whiners that can't adapt.
(No my pvp alt does not fly caldari)
I love this guy. The embodyment of all those who support these insane sweeping changes.
"I hope CCP won't cave to the whiners that can't adapt."
You ****ing moron! The only reason they are nerfing it is because a bunch of people whined and couldn't adapt!!! We are pvpers! "Telling a PVP'er to adapt is like telling a shark to swim, he's doing it anyway." -Pheonix Kanan
If people like you had adapted as opposed to whining, this thread wouldn't be here and you wouldn't have made that stupid comment!
Nerfing ludicrous speed is needed, but these sweeping nerfs are insane and go WAY to far. This nerf is wrong and needs to be reworked.
|
onymous
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 19:41:00 -
[1712]
the changes go too far. |
atrabilious
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 19:42:00 -
[1713]
/signed |
myrmecophilous
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 19:42:00 -
[1714]
/signed |
Dizeezer Velar
League of Disgruntled Fast Food Employees
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 19:53:00 -
[1715]
Edited by: Dizeezer Velar on 07/08/2008 19:53:10
/signed.
Say no to Drake tennis.
[/url] |
Venetiyan'Hel
Fields Of Fire
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 20:34:00 -
[1716]
Edited by: Venetiyan''Hel on 07/08/2008 20:35:52
Edited by: Venetiyan''Hel on 07/08/2008 20:35:03
Originally by: hast Ulga
N.N.N!
No Nano Nerf !
This.
Against.
(Minmatars main defence is speed, I like speed. DO NOT NERF THIS.
EDIT: First on page 61. \o/
EDIT 2: Showing my support with the thumbs up.
----------------------------------------
If you're leaving scorch marks, you need a bigger gun. |
Jordan Musgrat
H A V O C
The Requiem
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 21:15:00 -
[1717]
Against.
CCP stated that nanogangs are broken. I fully support a reasonable nerf on nanos. However, I do not support a nerf to speed and every single ship that uses speed to get anywhere.
The idea is horrible. CCP should know better than to give crap dev blogs after the carrier nerf one. If CCP wants to come up with a way to nerf nano gangs, they need to get a consensus from the community, because it's quite clear by now that we know the inner workings of the game far better than the devs.
-----------
Primary is family values, secondary is 0.0... |
Jan Laursen
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 21:50:00 -
[1718]
AGAINST
|
jerrard iceni
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 23:06:00 -
[1719]
AGAINST
Nanos need some tweaking/balancing but the changes on sisi arent the way to do it.
|
Yoh Starblade
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 00:14:00 -
[1720]
Against.
While I'm not against the changes per say, I'm against the sweeping nature of it. It just plain overkill for such a minor problem such as nanos.
Babysteps CCP, babysteps.
|
|
|
Maijugs Arhueg
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 00:15:00 -
[1721]
Originally by: Yoh Starblade
a minor problem such as nanos.
LOL, TEH INNERNET.
|
Soyemia
Art of War
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 08:03:00 -
[1722]
Yes. I dont want my minmatar toon be useless.
Official BoB fanboy. Called Stabemia. Corp hopper. |
Zhilan Alaioki
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 08:19:00 -
[1723]
I want to see A nano nerf, just not THIS one as it's taking a sledgehammer approach.
|
Azuraito
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 09:00:00 -
[1724]
Edited by: Azuraito on 08/08/2008 09:02:44
Some kind of speed nerf is required, especially for the vaga.
But what the dev is proposing is ludicrous and will effect stuff that does not need to be changed.
I will have to be with the eve community on this one.
AGAINST!
btw.. LaVista? if it was only an idea, why is the nerf running on SiSi?
PS.. any chance we could vote on stasis bubbles to combat these pesky minmattar 
|
DNSBLACK
Gallente
Dirt Nap Squad
Dirt Nap Associates
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 11:17:00 -
[1725]
AGAINST
|
beretta74
We are Legend
eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 12:17:00 -
[1726]
AGAINST!!!
|
duece duece
We are Legend
eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 13:18:00 -
[1727]
totally against!!!
|
Pun1sh3r
Perkone
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 13:20:00 -
[1728]
AGAINST!!
|
Diabolyc
Most Wanted INC
G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 13:30:00 -
[1729]
AGAINST!!!!!
|
Vladameir Harkenin
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 15:42:00 -
[1730]
I do not fly nano, but I can see the reasoning behind being able to nano a hac. If they can't be nanoed they generally aren't much better then there bc counterparts making paying the isk not worth it.
Also there is no reason to nerf speed across the board, killing one race (minmatar)and making another races weaponry (blasters) completely useless.
Nerf ludicrous, don't kill speed tanking as it's a viable tactic.
|
|
|
Taya Tal
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 16:52:00 -
[1731]
/signed
P.S. CCP YOU SUCK AT LIFE
This is an individual rant that really doesn't have much to do with the nano nerf but over the past few months my experience with CCP Staff has been extremely bad.
Thus I might quit eve for greener pastures so I can flame CCP and not really care.
(No you can not have my stuff I would destroy it before I would give it to you).
CCP YOU ARE ALL GIGANTIC ***GOTS NOW GO DIE BY HEAD TRAUMA FROM A PENCIL NOW OR SOMETHING YOU GAY PEDO***GOTS!!!!
|
N'irrti
PURE Legion
Pure.
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 20:20:00 -
[1732]
give speed a chance :D
|
Genji Ancient
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 21:31:00 -
[1733]
AGAINST !
|
Lex Aeterna
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 21:40:00 -
[1734]
AGAINST!
|
Alex Salas
BROTHERHOOD OF SPARTA
Dominatus Phasmatis
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 21:45:00 -
[1735]
|
Yadot
Tarfen Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.08.08 22:32:00 -
[1736]
Bad..
Spent a few days on Singularity and I am disappointed. As Minmatar, even my mission ships are screwed and I can no longer have a bit of fun tanking L4's in a Claw.
Nano is not an "I win" button, it takes extensive skill and big isk to make it really effective.
Why should pilots who have invested time and isk be nerfed because some disgruntled idiots cannot adapt?
CCP, don't take away the reason to specialise.
|
Develon Hitaki
|
Posted - 2008.08.09 00:28:00 -
[1737]
totally against this Idea
|
Hetjan
D00M.
Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.09 00:48:00 -
[1738]
Support .. sooo against this ****up nerf |
Dapanman1
Beets and Gravy Syndicate
The InterBus Initiative
|
Posted - 2008.08.09 02:30:00 -
[1739]
NOZH DROP THE SLEDGEHAMMER AND STEP AWAY FROM THE NANOS.
You may find this scalpel is more effective, I'll show you to the polycarbons. Stop panting, please.
Sig removed for inappropriate content.~~~Applebabe |
Kusotarre
Cutting Edge Incorporated
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.09 07:08:00 -
[1740]
Against, but I've already cancelled all my accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |