|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
lecrotta
lecrotta Corp
|
Posted - 2008.09.14 16:46:00 -
[1]
Edited by: lecrotta on 14/09/2008 17:03:12
Originally by: Meina Lamia
Nano Lovers = Skilless Explotiers.
It seems to me that calling something a exploit cos it forces ppl to use skill, team work and modules like webs, nuets and points to be able to fight and kill them is a bit of a stretch tbh.
NANO should be applauded and encouraged for its ability to make ppl use skill and team work and versatile and varied fits to defeat it. Unfortunately it seems the ppl who either or are not up to the challenge or dislike complicated, skilled and intricate combat have rather loud voices, lets hope ccp took note of the vote on the other forum.
|
lecrotta
lecrotta Corp
|
Posted - 2008.09.15 11:03:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Meina Lamia
Incorrect. You cannot applaud people for taking advantage of a game mechanic, thats like congratulating a theif for getting way with somebodies hard earned money.
Are you just a idiot or a pathetic troll looking for a argument?.
Nano does not steal anything from the game but it does force ppl to use skill and team work on both sides in a gang fight instead of just sitting opposite each other in a static blob slug fest.
Originally by: Meina Lamia There were highly skilled people, teamwork and tactics long befor the Nano era. To imply that Nanos brought this about is absurd.
I implied nothing of the sort but as per usual and typically you are expanding a comment to its extreme and adding a large dose of crap to go along with it.
EVE has changed a lot over the years and years nano has been around so trying to turn back the clock 4 years or so and saying all will be the same is ridiculous considering how much has changed in the game. We have alliances now that can use jump bridge networks larger than the entire player base was back then ffs.
Originally by: Meina Lamia It could in turn create even more tactics the the staleness that is Blobs and Nanos.
Another blanket statement saying and adding nothing but giving possibilities and maybes you enough to hide your lack of understanding behind.
1. What new tactics mr pro cos ive been on both patched test servers and gang combat is static and lacking in versatility, in fact its a lot like ratting with numbers.
2. How is fast moving pvp where you need to actually tackle to kill while defending your tacklers with logistics and ewar stale?. Come on you mean too hard for you really don't you????.
3. How can nerfing nano effect blob warfare?.
Bud every time you post you show just how little you know about eve history and about pvp.
POST WITH YOUR MAIN I DARE YOU.
|
lecrotta
lecrotta Corp
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 13:51:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Col Terror So without reading 80 some pages, will my training of HAC 5 go to waste?
Yup.
SAVE NANO!!!!!!....only needing f1-f8 to kill is not a skilled style of combat.
|
lecrotta
lecrotta Corp
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 13:51:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Col Terror So without reading 80 some pages, will my training of HAC 5 go to waste?
Yup.
SAVE NANO!!!!!!....only needing f1-f8 to kill is not a skilled style of combat.
|
lecrotta
lecrotta Corp
|
Posted - 2008.10.27 15:25:00 -
[5]
Edited by: lecrotta on 27/10/2008 15:25:12
Originally by: Nian Banks
Originally by: Hul'ka why this topic isn't sticky?
That would be because CCP find this thread unpleasant to look at, basically its a massive thread that says they are **** heads.
Yea but they did post the "local nerf" thread in hopes of deflecting ppls ire at this one a little....a bit like taking somebodies mind of a sore tooth by kicking them in the b0llocks but hey lol thats ccp for ya.... |
|
|
|