Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sean HellFire
Wasted Prophets S I L E N T.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 18:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
recently i trained up a mining toon, and was shocked when CCP switched the skill requirement for the coveter from mining barges 3 to mining barge 5, the ship that I had been happily chewing rocks with suddenly became a paperweight in my hanger for the next 21 days as I trained the skill up. and then I switched into my Hulk. by requiring mining barge 5 for the coveter it makes it a useless ship, at mining barge 5 you're taking the day of training and and flying an exhumer, not fiddling around with a coveter, and very rarely does it make sense to fly a coveter when you could fly a hulk. Additionally it is a Tech 1 Tier 3 ship, for every other ship class in game that means skill level 3. CCP may believe that it makes sense to make players train a 20 day skill for a tech 1 sub capital ship, but I respectfully disagree, and I would like to see the old requirements back in place. |
zerush
Zulu Technologies
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 18:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
This is already addressed by the new ship skill system, which is coming soon(tm)...
EDIT: Dev Blog
"Increase progression consistency by ensuring all navy ships and entry requirement for upper classes have a skill level 4 requirement, while tech 2 has a level 5 requirement. For example, that means lowering the Covetor's Mining Barge requirement from 5 to 4, but also reducing Battleship requirement from 5 to 4 for capitals." |
Heathkit
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 18:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Covetor also needs Astrogeology V, which is pretty ridiculous. Hopefully they move it to needing barge and astrogeo to IV |
Sean HellFire
Wasted Prophets S I L E N T.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
In my first post i mentioned a revert to the old requirements. This was a noobism on my part, apparently coveters always needed Mining barge 5, still a problem, lol, just not a new one as I had originally thought. I apologize for my stupidity :-) |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |