| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
fuze
Gallente
Chosen Path
Veritas Immortalis
   |
Posted - 2008.10.06 11:21:00 -
[1]
You are kidding right? Ever heard of conflict of interest?
If a CSM member is banned from the game/forums the CSM itself should decide among themselves about the fate of their fellow member.
|
fuze
Gallente
Chosen Path
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2008.10.07 05:59:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: LaVista Vista
Lets try and look at it another way:
How about this example:
You continue to keep posting on the forums about the age question for CSM and get a forum ban because of it (purely hypothetical ofc). Would it then be fair to get kicked out CSM?
Besides even then when the rest of CSM don't vote you out would CCP still communicate to you?
What if then all of the CSM would resign because of that?
It's all a big WHAT IF but it's better to think about it now and not when it's too late.
|
fuze
Gallente
Chosen Path
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2008.10.07 08:31:00 -
[3]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
But they aren't unreasonable people.
Being unreasonable isn't as black and white as you might think. The CSM should at have the ability to form its own opinion about this. Is CCP's change of the min age for CSM reasonable? Is getting banned from the forums because you lost your temper when you got trolled for months reasonable? Is getting banned because of outing CCP mishaps reasonable? |
fuze
Gallente
Chosen Path
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2008.10.07 10:07:00 -
[4]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Reason is not a 1-way thing.
Originally by: fuze
Being unreasonable isn't as black and white as you might think.
I guess we agree on this.
No system and nobody is perfect otherwise there wouldn't be the need for CSM.
Lets take the following rule:
Quote:
17. You may not engage in any activity that increases the difficulty and/or expense of CCP in maintaining the EVE Online client, server, web site or other services for the benefit and enjoyment of all its users.
http://www.eve-online.com/pnp/terms.asp
It basically means that if you get moderated on the e-o forums you can get banned for it and then consequently be removed as CSM. It simply depends on the way you interpret this rule. And that's an example of where it can go wrong. When CSM continues to disagree about a decision CCP made, do they then still kick that member or can he/she stay? |
fuze
Gallente
Chosen Path
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2008.10.10 14:06:00 -
[5]
Originally by: thoth foc
And to echo Gramtar's sentiment, i believe CCP wouldnt allow someone to be evicted from the council unjustly.
-1, naive
Nobody is perfect but it doesn't hurt to try. |
| |
|