Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
elder01
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 15:06:00 -
[1]
hi would ccp be willing to build t2 carrier i just it wold be sweet we do have a lot of ships in t2 but i think it would be cool to have t2 carrier tell me what you think
|
Duncan Bannatyne
The Sky Is The Limit
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 15:32:00 -
[2]
Whilst it's classed as Tier and not Tech 2 I'd call Motherships within that catergory and therefore theres no point in creating another carrier unless it had very specialised roles.
|
Falaricae
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 15:45:00 -
[3]
Yes it would be cool. Just like deathrays, supercarriers and a thousand other ideas.
EVE has a history of having to nerf things afterwards. CCP introduces features without thoroughly planning how they effect game balance. I would like to keep this constant tweaking to a minimum, so you might have to think about how this idea fits in the current world. What would a T2 carrier do, what would the stats be and what purpose/role would it fill? Flesh out your idea a bit and then let others build on that.
|
Kalintos Tyl
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 17:23:00 -
[4]
mothership should be t2 carrier, using t2 materails . titan should be t2 dread. But well that trit must go into somthing ?:D
|
Vincent Jarjadian
|
Posted - 2008.10.13 01:28:00 -
[5]
That wouldnt work
A Rhea is built from a charon,
but you cant build a Nyx from a Thanatos, they have different hulls. nor an erebus from a moros.
Now with capitals becoming to prevalent in large numbers, maybe a t2 version with superior tanking etc would be in order...
since so many carriers/dreads are in production from BPCs, inventing them would be insanely expensive.
with this lack of BPCs it would mean only a couple would be built... CCP could make it difficult to invent them, and as long as they dont put out a BPO for them like most of the other t2 stuff it would work.
|
Felix Dzerzhinsky
Caldari Wreckless Abandon G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.10.13 03:01:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Vincent Jarjadian That wouldnt work
A Rhea is built from a charon,
but you cant build a Nyx from a Thanatos, they have different hulls. nor an erebus from a moros.
Now with capitals becoming to prevalent in large numbers, maybe a t2 version with superior tanking etc would be in order...
since so many carriers/dreads are in production from BPCs, inventing them would be insanely expensive.
with this lack of BPCs it would mean only a couple would be built... CCP could make it difficult to invent them, and as long as they dont put out a BPO for them like most of the other t2 stuff it would work.
I employ the opposit logic -
since capitals are becoming prevelant, lets NOT have t2 versions of carriers. As it is, carriers cost 1.5 bil fitted t2. Motherships cost 18 bil without fittings and a fully fitted titan, if you can find one is going to run you 160 bil or so (pure speculation - add/subtract tens of billions).
so, what do you want in a t2 carrier that is not as gimped as a mom and costs something between 1.5 and 18 bill and does something very very spacific. ----
ECCM is a Counter-measure not a defense. |
elder01
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 06:18:00 -
[7]
well say like they can jump far then the nomal carrier i think which would be cool may be biger bouse for the dps for the fighters im open to hear what player think
|
Waxau
Mortis Angelus The Church.
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 11:44:00 -
[8]
A new carrier will be released shortly. Flagships. These are referred to as 'Wing Command Carriers', which have the same 'role' as commandships (although im sure they'll lack the 'tank-raise' that commandships got, to battlecruisers. Either way, expect huge bonus giving carriers sometime in the near future
|
Deva Blackfire
D00M.
|
Posted - 2008.10.14 11:45:00 -
[9]
maybe first fix the cluster**** that is nano nerf and fix issues which will come out right after? and fix "rollback" issue - then CCP could like add new toys...
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |