Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.10.29 20:29:00 -
[1]
CCP Diagoras has posted the results of the second CSM submission to CCP for this term, and so we finally have responses on these topics. I haven't seen much discussion on this list, which I find rather surprising, so I figured I'd start some. Talk about whatever you want, but here's a few questions to start debate:
Everyone: What do you think of the responses - are there any you're excited or disappointed to see? Which do you think is a higher priority - bounty hunter/merc improvements, or sovereignty changes(or other game changes of similar weight)? What do you have to say about the questions raised by the review of missions?
Candidates: Are any of CCP's responses going to cause you to change any elements of your platform? Are there any topics where you'd press CCP for a more complete or more satisfactory response? Do you think these responses change what sort of topics the CSM should advance in future?
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2008.10.29 21:58:00 -
[2]
I'd like to see more communication with specific developers. CCP should assign a dev to an issue, so that afterwards the CSM that owns the issue can get in touch with feedback or ask for a status update. Now I get the feeling that some issues like the gametime codes are just being ignored, and we don't have the means to go after it. Likewise I'd like to see much more interaction for industry affairs, we got an expansion coming up, so why not use the CSM to gather player intererst and organize discussions? I think we should have something akin to live dev blogs with CSM people, but instead that they can ask questions directly.
I'm not too happy with the answers given to us. There was more discussion than you can see in the minutes, but it was still too shallow to my tastes. ---
CSM Campaign Thread
|
LaVista Vista
Conservative Shenanigans Party
|
Posted - 2008.10.30 07:04:00 -
[3]
Alot of the questions aren't all that good, but I don't think we can fix that.
However, the way the issues were posted maybe wasn't the best way. People need to be able to discuss each issue in it's own thread. The way this was posted, compared to the way Wrangler did it, is a bit poor.
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.10.30 10:11:00 -
[4]
Originally by: LaVista Vista Alot of the questions aren't all that good, but I don't think we can fix that.
However, the way the issues were posted maybe wasn't the best way. People need to be able to discuss each issue in it's own thread. The way this was posted, compared to the way Wrangler did it, is a bit poor.
A point, but I think it would have been fine if he'd linked back to the original issue threads. Actually, that's probably the best way to do it, come to think of it - means people won't keep adding to them forever.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |