Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lemmy Kravitz
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 07:34:00 -
[1]
navy issue destroy is something I would like to see
suggestion of mine is this
no ROF penatly 1 extra mid slot 1 extra low slot
|
Miyamoto Uroki
Caldari Katsu Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 08:25:00 -
[2]
I would like to see destroyers that are able to hold up with their intentionel role. To protect large vessels like battleships against pesky small interceptors and stuff, that especially after the upcoming changes almost are unkillable for battleships.
Though that would mean that true tech2 destroyers would have to be ubar-slow (battleship to battlecruiser speed is enough, really), hold guns that don't have too much range (like max 40km range) and that would have a damn strong tank, somewhere along the tank that HACs can field. That would create a convoy support vessel that would give reasoning to field destroyers in gangs and fleets. Not the paper thin vessels they are atm.
|
Stork DK
Minmatar Synthetic Frontiers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 10:44:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Miyamoto Uroki would have a damn strong tank, somewhere along the tank that HACs can field.
Made me chuckle =]
Dessys are fine. You'r doing it wrong. Bring on the navy dessys! ----- Signature unavailable. |
Samaritan Azuma
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 10:59:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Samaritan Azuma on 31/10/2008 11:00:06
If it weren't for downtime, I wouldn't make stupid posts. |
Atius Tirawa
Minmatar Wreckless Abandon G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 11:31:00 -
[5]
no ROF and 2 extra slots is too much. . . -----------
|
Elurilmar
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 11:44:00 -
[6]
Just an extra slot in the weakness area of the ship (mid for coercer, low for cormorant etc) and a couple hundred more hp would be just fine.
|
Ruban Boatbuyer
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 13:06:00 -
[7]
Just make them invulnerable to their racial Electronic warfare e.g. Caldari Cormorant gets an ECCM bonus
|
Lemmy Kravitz
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 13:23:00 -
[8]
idk about 1 extra med and low slot being to much, look at navy issue stabber
I don't want to mess with resists and hp at all on destroyer cause then it would stop being a destroyer and more of a "light cruiser"
oh which reminds me 20m3 drone bay that's what they need on the navy issue
don't nerf navy destroyer speed, destroyers are slow enough as it is
that or let me fit 8 missle launchers =)
either way destroyers need a navy/fleet issue version
|
Papusa
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 15:08:00 -
[9]
Signed... second low slot for a Corm would be very nice! maybe faction version too!!!!
|
Nexus Kinnon
Neo Spartans
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 15:24:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Samaritan Azuma Edited by: Samaritan Azuma on 31/10/2008 11:00:06
make all your posts like this
|
|
InsanlyEvlPerson
Gallente Night-Stalkers
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 15:41:00 -
[11]
can we just boost the dessies we have a little? another slot on their weak level, and a little more fitting! ---------------------------------------------
I may be a bit over Zealot, but i cant help myself, its the best investment i ever made! |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |