Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Trode Tradantine
|
Posted - 2008.12.20 09:26:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Trode Tradantine on 20/12/2008 09:35:58 Hi I am CEO of Anti-Scam Squadron and I petition spamming scammers in jita..¦.but it can be really enoying that there is a petion limit I can only have to petions open at a time would really like this number to be unlimited
Best Regards - Trode Tradantine - CEO Anti-Scam Squadron
|
Abrazzar
|
Posted - 2008.12.20 10:08:00 -
[2]
If the petition limit would be unlimited, you'd have bots spamming the petition queues with crap, just to hide the legit petitions against them.
-------- Ideas for: Mining
|
Trode Tradantine
|
Posted - 2008.12.20 10:39:00 -
[3]
hmm didn't think of that. But it could be raised to atleast 6 petitions per account instead of 2 per character
|
Mra Rednu
Amarr FiFi LaFey Recruitment Services LTD
|
Posted - 2008.12.20 12:09:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Trode Tradantine hmm didn't think of that. But it could be raised to atleast 6 petitions per account instead of 2 per character
Isn't 2 per character 6 per account already ?
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.12.20 12:54:00 -
[5]
The problem here is with you. Scamming is legit in Eve, and you should not be petitioning them. If you waste your petitions on stupid ones that will fail, it's not CCP's concern when you run out.
In fact, I'd wager that the petition limit is specifically aimed at people like you, who would gladly throw out 100 petitions against legitimate game mechanics they don't understand, and flood the queues to drown out the legitimate petitions. 2 stupid ones is enough for the GMs to deal with, they don't need the other 98 identical petitions to wade through. - Lottery - Golem! Cruiser BPC Store |
Antihrist Pripravnik
Gallente The 13th Gallentean Armed Response
|
Posted - 2008.12.23 13:43:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Antihrist Pripravnik on 23/12/2008 13:43:32
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto The problem here is with you. Scamming is legit in Eve, and you should not be petitioning them. If you waste your petitions on stupid ones that will fail, it's not CCP's concern when you run out.
In fact, I'd wager that the petition limit is specifically aimed at people like you, who would gladly throw out 100 petitions against legitimate game mechanics they don't understand, and flood the queues to drown out the legitimate petitions. 2 stupid ones is enough for the GMs to deal with, they don't need the other 98 identical petitions to wade through.
true...
the best you can do is to block all contracts from the scammer (if you want) or add the scammer in "Blocked" list so you don't see their spam in local... scammers are not something you should petition, there are scammers in RL so why not in eve. 6 petitions per acount is enough, so no support here
|
Rosur
Phoibe Enterprises Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2008.12.23 13:52:00 -
[7]
Scamming is allowed in eve.
|
Andrea Griffin
|
Posted - 2008.12.30 18:01:00 -
[8]
I would like to see an increase in the number of available petitions, but not because I am part of an anti-scam crowd. I have run into issues before where I have had too many legitimate petitions on one character, and had to log in with one of my alts in order to file a new one.
Not a huge game-breaking deal, but still annoying.
Once that whole debacle was over, I did petition to have my petition limit increased, since I thought it was a dynamic value. I was told that the number was hard coded and that it could not be changed on a per-user basis.
Perhaps this could be changed. People who use the petition system for legitimate purposes should be allowed to petition to have their limit increased if they feel it to be necessary. The GMs can look over that character's petition history, and if they are using the petition system as it was intended, the petition limit could be raised.
Conversely, people who continually abuse the petition system to attack legal (albeit slimey) behavior and just end up wasting GM time, like the OP, should have their limit reduced. Perhaps to 0.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |