|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Murina
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2008.12.31 14:36:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Murina on 31/12/2008 14:36:36
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer
Getting owned by any other ship is fine. You know why? Because you can atleast fight back while going down. That is the core objection people are making against falcons/ecm. Welcome to eve.
drones, fof....
Of course with jammers gone the race with the best range dmg/ratios will be getting another side ways boost to their favored style of pvp.......who was that race again?.....
|
Murina
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2008.12.31 14:47:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer
Originally by: Murina
drones, fof....
Do fof and drones reach 240km?
Falcons can do dmg at 240km?.....
|
Murina
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2008.12.31 16:10:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Polinus
Originally by: Murina
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer
Originally by: Murina
drones, fof....
Do fof and drones reach 240km?
Falcons can do dmg at 240km?.....
Why would they need?
So the other recons can kill me solo but the falcon needs a extra tackler+dmg dealer along with it to kill me...as long as i do not have drones or fof that can kill the tackler/dmg dealer.....
Any you still think falcons are overpowered when you need at least one more ship to make them effective?.
|
Murina
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2008.12.31 16:12:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Murina on 31/12/2008 16:14:51
Originally by: Christari Zuborov
Frigate 8 Inty 9 Destroyer 10 AF 12 Cruiser 13 HAC 15 HIC 15 CS 16 BC 16 BS 17 BOp 17 Logistic 19 Ewar Frigate 21 CovOp 22 Recon 28
Originally by: Seishomaru And that takes like 15 seconds to lock the falcon (means time for another cycle basically to try).
15 second lock time?????...WTF are you flying a carrier or a dread cos most of that list can lock considerably faster than 15 secs pal.
|
Murina
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.01.03 17:00:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Zarnak Wulf
Originally by: Amira Shadowsong
Originally by: Zarnak Wulf Refresh my memory but didn't the falcon get a boost during the summer of 2007 in terms of ECM strength? I'm not arguing for or against a nerf but rumors of the CCP sledgehammer may be overrated. Surely they won't take it back to pre- 2007 lvls.
But they can nerf its range.
Well my Tempest pre QR had an optimal of 198km. Now it's 156km. Fair is fair.
Arties do need a LOT of love and id certainly support a major buff, but it is not a justification to nerf other systems.
|
Murina
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.01.03 19:13:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Amira Shadowsong
Originally by: Zarnak Wulf
Well my Tempest pre QR had an optimal of 198km. Now it's 156km. Fair is fair.
They need to boost rigs yes.
Yea just fix arties when you can sideways boost amarr again hey bud.....
|
Murina
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.01.03 19:20:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Amira Shadowsong
Originally by: Murina
Yea WHY just fix arties when you can sideways boost amarr again hey bud.....
You like doing total wrong leaps in logic.
Fixed my typo..
|
Murina
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.01.03 19:54:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Removal Tool
By all means. Let's all fly Falcons so we can all just perma jam each other because,
Gotta love the "PERMA" jam comments.....max jam str from a t2 falcon = 14ish, falcons sig str 28.......need i really do the math?.
|
|
|
|