Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kazzac Elentria
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 17:13:00 -
[1]
This is a proposal to add some security changes to corporate science and industry jobs in addition to changes to the output and input location for a corporate job.
In essence right now it is possible that if given builder rights any one person can cancel any one job. There is no security break down allowing the installation of a job, but requiring intervention for the completion of that job or at a very minimum only allowing the installer, director, or ceo to deliver the item.
It is proposed that this be changed to only allow either the installer or a higher security level to deliver or cancel the science or industry job.
In addition, it is also requested that the input/output location possibilities for corporate jobs have added to them the personal hangars of corporate members. Meaning using say a locked down print in high security, I can select my personal hangar as the source for mats and my personal hangar for the output.
This was brought up in the market discussion forum regarding a cooperative business plan between parties wanting to pool assets together, but maintain singularity in actual operation of those assets.
You can find the discussion here
|
YouGotRipped
Ewigkeit
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 17:17:00 -
[2]
Edited by: YouGotRipped on 28/01/2009 17:26:07
|
ksc1226
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 17:36:00 -
[3]
|
cosmoray
Cosmoray Construction
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 18:09:00 -
[4]
/signed |
Astarte Nosferatu
Abrivianius Manufacturing Corporation
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 19:24:00 -
[5]
Signed.
This is a much needed proposal. |
Brock Nelson
Flux Technologies Inc
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 19:28:00 -
[6]
/signed |
Kazzac Elentria
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 19:52:00 -
[7]
Signing my own
/they really need to fix that |
Estel Arador
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 20:17:00 -
[8]
signing |
Feryal Sky
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 20:26:00 -
[9]
|
Shinosk
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 20:28:00 -
[10]
|
|
MailDeadDrop
Globaltech Industries
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 20:32:00 -
[11]
/signed |
Linia
Linia Corp
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 22:15:00 -
[12]
|
Clair Bear
Perkone
|
Posted - 2009.01.28 22:48:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Clair Bear on 28/01/2009 22:48:58 Vigorous thumbs up for restricting cancel & delivery options and addition of personal hangar to both input and output of factory jobs.
This is sorely needed.
With current mechanics there is absolutely zero reason for industrialists to join player corps vs. flying solo. These mechanics would allow for newer players to provide value to established manufacturing organizations. |
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2009.01.29 01:29:00 -
[14]
Big thumbs up. |
Petyr Baelich
Taggart Transdimensional Virtue of Selfishness
|
Posted - 2009.01.29 01:46:00 -
[15]
|
Myrhial Arkenath
Ghost Festival
|
Posted - 2009.01.29 12:36:00 -
[16]
Supported |
Kazuo Ishiguro
House of Marbles Zzz
|
Posted - 2009.01.29 16:59:00 -
[17]
Supported, but we know it's not going to happen until CCP completely rewrites the entire R&D system. This in turn isn't going to happen unless most of the corp & POS mechanics are also rehashed. It's got to the point where attempting to make any changes would probably break the whole thing - most of the code was written several years ago. --- Can't afford that BPO? Look here. 20:1 mineral compression The EVE f@h team |
Cyberman Mastermind
|
Posted - 2009.01.29 17:14:00 -
[18]
|
Murixo
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2009.01.29 18:06:00 -
[19]
absolutely signed.
|
CornerStoner
|
Posted - 2009.01.29 22:23:00 -
[20]
|
|
Forceflow
Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2009.02.02 02:19:00 -
[21]
/signed.
|
Axel Vindislaga
|
Posted - 2009.02.03 12:04:00 -
[22]
.... Looking at the shifty face of the original poster I am wondering what is his angle... I agree that the jobs should not be able to be canceled by low ranked members but the input output targeting player hangers is usable for corp theft.
This is a proposed mechanism for corp theft in the guise of a security improvement.
There is no need for this as lower ranking untrusted members can simply be given access only to less important materials and BPs.
Recapping: NO NEED, THUMB DOWN. |
LaVista Vista
|
Posted - 2009.02.03 12:11:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Kazzac Elentria This is a proposal to add some security changes to corporate science and industry jobs in addition to changes to the output and input location for a corporate job.
In essence right now it is possible that if given builder rights any one person can cancel any one job. There is no security break down allowing the installation of a job, but requiring intervention for the completion of that job or at a very minimum only allowing the installer, director, or ceo to deliver the item.
It is proposed that this be changed to only allow either the installer or a higher security level to deliver or cancel the science or industry job.
I raised an issue about it just a few weeks ago when we were in Iceland. Head over and find the minutes from that meeting. |
Dawts
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
|
Posted - 2009.02.10 21:58:00 -
[24]
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |