Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Awox
Minmatar Advanced Logistics
|
Posted - 2009.02.08 19:08:00 -
[1]
Issue is this, for a long time now CCP have made piracy less viable as a profession and less enjoyable as a game style. Nerfs I can think of since I originally started playing and pirating: Hitpoint buffs Agility buffs Jump Freighters Further hitpoint buffs Rigs allowing ships to tank a lot more Further agility buffs Making gates incredibly massive Blockades/Transports being made very useful
I think the players who started pirating, and well, any pirate who tries it and decides it's not worth the trouble should be given the option to reset their security status, with some restrictions, such as: a) Only one reset to 0.0 sec status every year, otherwise people will just use it every time they need a new ship from Jita b) It should perhaps some ammount of ISK, but not so much that it removes this option for newbie pirates c) Any existing kill rights are given an extra 3 months before they expire, and said killrights include podding rights. Perhaps make said killrights resuable/tradable.
A lot of people don't PvP in low-sec because the security hits that can occur can cause too much hassle later on in the game. If it were not so hard to try this play-style and back out of it if it does not suit - low-sec might be a bit more exciting.
Newbies who try pirating currently have a VERY hard time raising their security status, especially if they have to do it in the same space where they are most likey to lose it - low-security space with really, really crappy NPCs.
CCP are giving players stats roll backs soon (as mentioned by the lead producer on EVE TV during alliance tournament TODAY) - so why not help out people who got stuck in a profession that has only ever become less profitable and less enjoyable! |
Awox
Advanced Logistics
|
Posted - 2009.02.08 19:12:00 -
[2]
supportin' dis |
Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2009.02.08 19:12:00 -
[3]
Not supported - get out to 0.0 and kill some rats. |
Darwin's Market
|
Posted - 2009.02.08 19:15:00 -
[4]
Simplest way would be to give better sec repairing rats in low-sec, without the higher bounties.
None the less, I support such an endeavour. |
Zenethalos
Minmatar Noir.
|
Posted - 2009.02.08 19:50:00 -
[5]
Hahaha last time I saw you you were camping molden heath with an army of alts hapily ganking haulers. Now you are done and need to get back into empire you want the easy ride. If the rest of us can work our sec status up (i did from -9) in a week or two why do we need a change. You commit a crime now pay for it. |
Awox
Minmatar Advanced Logistics
|
Posted - 2009.02.08 19:59:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Zenethalos Hahaha last time I saw you you were camping molden heath with an army of alts hapily ganking haulers. Now you are done and need to get back into empire you want the easy ride. If the rest of us can work our sec status up (i did from -9) in a week or two why do we need a change. You commit a crime now pay for it.
Last time I was attacking ships in Molden Heath and getting security hits for it was over a year ago. I am already back in empire, why not show info me in-game? Figure out who my alts are and check them too. |
Drake Draconis
Minmatar Shadow Cadre Worlds End Consortium
|
Posted - 2009.02.08 21:39:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Santiago Fahahrri Not supported - get out to 0.0 and kill some rats.
This |
Isaac Starstriker
Amarr Solaris Operations
|
Posted - 2009.02.08 22:21:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Drake Draconis
Originally by: Santiago Fahahrri Not supported - get out to 0.0 and kill some rats.
This
Word.
--Isaac |
JAK480
|
Posted - 2009.02.09 11:18:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Santiago Fahahrri Not supported - get out to 0.0 and kill some rats.
signed |
Camilo Cienfuegos
Earned In Blood
|
Posted - 2009.02.09 11:28:00 -
[10]
Supported more as a "there has to be a better mechanic that ratting for this" suggestion.
Not the wording: Better, not quicker or easier. I don't like the idea of paying your sec clean, but I'd like to see the CSM investigate the sec status mechanic more closely and see if a better solution can be derived from their discussions. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |