Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Karlemgne on 18/11/2009 06:43:18 Originally by: Obsidian Hawk Originally by: Serena Ku Originally by: Tesha lol the ammount for crying here is just awsome, sweet sweet supercap pilot tears mmmh.. I for one,...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.18 06:43:00
|
2. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Chicken Breasts Dreads are and always will be the mainstay dps and body of a cap fleet and are worlds more efficient per ISK. Don't try and word it like the "anti-capital dps" role is solely covered by supercaps. Supercaps ...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.18 05:26:00
|
3. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: R0ze Originally by: Karlemgne What people are suggesting is that you simply lower the barrier of entry to super-caps. Despite what you think 10 billion isk is probably 15x what the average eve player has had in their...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.18 03:19:00
|
4. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Sellyna 3 new pages of post gone, ccp is realy trying to censoring this thread. It's great to live in a comunist world (CCP ftw) I only wish. My sig don't fracking work.
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.18 03:02:00
|
5. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Karlemgne on 18/11/2009 00:52:30 Edited by: Karlemgne on 18/11/2009 00:51:54 Originally by: R0ze So there is an effort to get not just complete few L4 and wolla you got a pwnmobile.. And if you are using it for lowsec h...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.18 00:51:00
|
6. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Drachenlord Actually, the greedy little selfish players comment could be directed at the "bitter vets" that own the bloody things and don't want anything to change about them... However, I for one hope to god CCP does NO...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.17 08:33:00
|
7. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Tarron Sarek There are so many greedy little selfish players posting in this thread, it really turns my stomach. And I start to fear that the devs will listen to them, although they clearly haven't got balance in mind. They ...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.17 08:25:00
|
8. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Lilith Velkor Originally by: Jenessa Well, the thing is in lowsec you cant have bubbles, there is no way to prevent them from reaching the docking point. So instead of making them dockable and affordable, now I'...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.17 05:35:00
|
9. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: R0ze Originally by: Drachenlord Seriously... the Cost Reduction is fine... What is so good about cost reduction? Why should the ship be available for everyone? And why should they only be available to some s...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.17 05:28:00
|
10. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Karlemgne on 16/11/2009 23:51:13 Originally by: Fogy Allright, from what i understand.. NGE was some patch, expansion or whatnot, that ruined SWG. or something. The "NGE," so called, was more than some patch. Lucas Arts...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.16 23:48:00
|
11. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Cain m Actually it's Crowd Control Productions aka ****s Counting Profits And what is CCP of not a capitalist entity? Did you think they were providing some free service for the benefit of mankind? My sig don't frack...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.16 22:57:00
|
12. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Karlemgne on 16/11/2009 22:52:25 Originally by: Ne0tr0n Originally by: Karlemgne Originally by: Tappits They are an end game ship used (read sat in at a pos for months) by end game players Please enlight...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.16 22:51:00
|
13. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Karlemgne on 16/11/2009 22:44:24 Edited by: Karlemgne on 16/11/2009 22:43:40 Edited by: Karlemgne on 16/11/2009 22:39:19 Originally by: Fogy Edited by: Fogy on 16/11/2009 22:32:13 Originally by: Karlemgne ...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.16 22:39:00
|
14. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kate Pole Originally by: Karlemgne Originally by: Quamar Marib Originally by: cpu939 remember he doesn't care about the ms pilot player base all he cares about is bumming down eve to get new players ...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.16 22:33:00
|
15. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Tappits They are an end game ship used (read sat in at a pos for months) by end game players Please enlighten us all, what exactly is an "end game player" in eve? Last time I looked, eve was a sandbox and there really w...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.16 22:25:00
|
16. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Quamar Marib Originally by: cpu939 remember he doesn't care about the ms pilot player base all he cares about is bumming down eve to get new players in next thing you'll see is the capital skill books costing 36m fo...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.16 22:16:00
|
17. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Karlemgne on 16/11/2009 10:25:06 Originally by: Manfred Sideous F irst CCP please allow Abathur to handle supercaps. R emember that unhappy customers = not subscribed users. If the 400 or so people who currently own m...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.16 10:25:00
|
18. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Slavemaster Edited by: Slavemaster on 15/11/2009 22:43:08 Gee...... What a bunch of Whiners.... I support CCP 100% on this. <-- Born 2003 But you don't understand, older players want something to work for. I g...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.15 23:10:00
|
19. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: kapten sortebil http://ccp.vo.llnwd.net/o2/pdf/QEN_Q3-2009.pdf 426 Characters in Moterships. Page 6/25 And yes i canceld 4 accounts after this stupid nerf. LoL. Every patch there are some emo posts like this. Don't ...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.15 19:32:00
|
20. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kraken Kill Lowering the price requires Fixing to BPO owners and current Mothership owners. Playing devils advocate here, why? CCP has made all kinds of game changes in the past that have tanked the value of the BPOs an...
- by Karlemgne - at 2009.11.15 19:19:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |