Pages: [1] |
1. Singularity: Rule violation reporting - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
System: EZA-FM, sat outside Intaki Station Aggressor: Death'Dancer. Summary: Frigates sat outside station. Battleship warped to station and began firing on frigates, killed one. Evidence: http://i.imgur.com/CXklHjw.png
- by Laevateinn - at 2017.07.10 22:42:58
|
2. Dumbing down eve yet again. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Not sure I understand where the idea of dumbing down comes from? The age of the game means CCP needs ways to bring new players into specialities so that they don't look at the 3+ year old players running plexes and get disheartened, and I am all f...
- by Laevateinn - at 2009.10.20 13:09:00
|
3. Need Confirmation on Sleeper NPC Firepower, Tactics - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Some details on our engagement Just to add a comment re the CCP one - most of the signatures were starting as 4 Frigates. My passive drake on another char could tank them no problem, just took a while to knock down the frigates due to a reduced...
- by Laevateinn - at 2009.02.19 16:54:00
|
4. Need Confirmation on Sleeper NPC Firepower, Tactics - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Laevateinn on 19/02/2009 07:59:11 Against Sleeper Battleships, 3 of them broke a mission drakes tank. Four of them positively owned it. Same went for a Mael on XL SB setup, 4 Hardeners, at times, their weapons seem to bypass all the...
- by Laevateinn - at 2009.02.19 07:57:00
|
5. Apocrypha on Singularity delayed - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP, will there be a new mirror applied to Singularity when the test version of the new expansion pack is released?
- by Laevateinn - at 2009.02.06 21:20:00
|
6. You want AA+HDR on nvidia card... Look here! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
A word for users using 8xx series cards (8800 GT etc) I recently updated my graphics drivers to compensate for poor GTA IV performance. This had the effect of causing major CPU load when I was zoomed in on a ship. I later learned that the antiali...
- by Laevateinn - at 2009.01.18 00:56:00
|
7. Falcons: Better Than Ever - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If the system is such that you can only fight fire with fire, then we've lost the sandbox nature of things. If there is a ship that can disable large portions of gangs, has the advantages of being cloaked with none of its drawbacks, be out of rang...
- by Laevateinn - at 2008.12.24 12:04:00
|
8. Falcons: Better Than Ever - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
*sigh* Most of the little ships got popped quite quickly. You are indeed correct, a cycle being 20 seconds. The Scorpion (1 mid ECCM, 2 low ECCM) was still under for a good minute. I believe the pilot was too busy swearing and screaming bloody mur...
- by Laevateinn - at 2008.12.23 14:29:00
|
9. Falcons: Better Than Ever - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: What did he use the rest of his jammers for? I have had situations where my racial have failed horribly, and forced me to spam my non racial ones to jam a high threat target. Also, did the raven fit ECCM? Do you know for 100% that he ...
- by Laevateinn - at 2008.12.23 12:55:00
|
10. Falcons: Better Than Ever - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: The Falcon, with a single jammer, jammed him 100% for the first five cycles. In return, the Scorpion, with 3 Graviton jammers strength 11, was unable to jam the Scorpion until the 4th cumelative volley (about 10 fails). I have maxed ...
- by Laevateinn - at 2008.12.23 11:46:00
|
11. Falcons: Better Than Ever - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Most points said above, can't add too much more, rather than a perspective. One of CCPs aims was to discourage large scale fleets, blobs and armadas. It puts strain on the server, so much so they've reworked their entire server network to cater f...
- by Laevateinn - at 2008.12.23 00:57:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |