|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.05 20:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Shalee Lianne wrote:I do believe that FW will become so much worse for newer players. Station lock outs will be a big deal to someone new to the game who doesn't have alts to move their things, etc.
Because yeah, they won't be getting recruited into FW corps that already have foundations who could help them out with stuff like that
Shalee Lianne wrote:Also, with all of the datacore farming that is going to happen, I doubt new players are going to get picked up for plexing fleets, who is going to want to share LP with them?
What they can't organize roams on their own? LP will only be handed out for Plexing after the patch?
Shalee Lianne wrote:Station lockouts are going to be bad for pvp as well because now we can roam all over the warzone, but once we are locked out of 75% of the stations, I think we are going to stay very close to home.
Already with FW we get shot at if we go into enemy highsec. Now we are just getting more limited on where we can go. Station lockout is not a good thing IMO.
Well then I guess you'd better look at taking strategic systems and holding them to base from.
Shalee Lianne wrote:Corporations who are looking to join FW after the expansion are going to join the side that is winning, who wants to join the losing side and have one or two systems you can maybe dock in?
Datacore farming is not enough of an incentive to join the losing side. A player can always go run Incursion and make more ISK and not have their standings butchered to the enemy side and have access to dock wherever. So yeah.
Sounds like you're planning on becoming an Incursion runner, so why are you crying about FW? |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.06 03:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
QQ MOAR
::War is hell:: |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.06 14:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jimmy Nickson wrote:Station lockouts come to TQ = CCP killed amarr militia
Many corps will leave because minmatar plex with way more numbers than us etc...
Also majority of the amarr populous is lacking they're on holidays or just not logging in so hardly any resistance. Not to mentchin any active players are not consistant players they're casual players. This basicly means all people who minmatar see as an opossing fleet on from will basicly drop out of fw because they can't use their ships minmatar will no longer have anybody to fight, they will just end up camping high-sec gates waiting for noobs to come and all the noobs will rage and leave so no amarr fw etc.... I know several corps who have already stated they will drop amarr fw if station lockouts come to TQ because of the reason amarr can't compete atm.
Yay moar tears.... |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 11:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Shalee Lianne wrote:Amarrian Slavetrader, it would be much more productive to post your insight on your main character instead of a trolling alt.
Don't blame militia for being 'pirate'. Do we have some? Sure. But some of us wouldn't be negative if we didn't have to take sec standings and GCC for shooting neutral alts of the enemies.
: Shoot neutral alts of the enemies with your own neutral alts?
I know, that's some real revolutionary thinking there. I can fully understand why you didn't have that thought on your own, I mean you did choose to be Amarr after all. |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 15:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:SigmaPi wrote: Not that I don't agree with you on this point, but there are ways of dealing with it. You could put up a staging pos in the system you're attacking with a ship maintenance array - each corp or alliance just needs a small to get it done. I think it brings some much needed logistical considerations to a fairly easy place to live, and I like that about the system. Siggy is absolutely right. Regardless of what everyone likes or doesn't like about the changes on the table, as long as there are capsuleers proposing creative solutions to the challenges presented before the Faction Warfare community, CCP has little incentive to change their course and cater to those that feel that one change or another makes things "impossible" or "hopeless". Alaekessa wrote:Shalee Lianne wrote:Amarrian Slavetrader, it would be much more productive to post your insight on your main character instead of a trolling alt.
Don't blame militia for being 'pirate'. Do we have some? Sure. But some of us wouldn't be negative if we didn't have to take sec standings and GCC for shooting neutral alts of the enemies. : Shoot neutral alts of the enemies with your own neutral alts? I know, that's some real revolutionary thinking there. I can fully understand why you didn't have that thought on your own, I mean you did choose to be Amarr after all. Hans Have you heard enough "creative solutions" people can use to adapt to this null sec lite system yet? First we have the suggestion that if you are outnumbered you should just put up a pos in enemy space. Now this: Let's train pvp alts that can be used to kill neutrals, so our main fw pvp characters can dock in high sec. Hopefully even you can see this is going nowhere.
You sure the name of your corp isn't Imperial Forum Outlaws? |
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
34
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 20:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
Almity wrote:[/ quote] You sure the name of your corp isn't Imperial Forum Outlaws?[/ quote]
We could make alts and put them in that corp and post here. Because trolling is how you communicate your interests to CCP. Well for being such a talented Forum Warrior, you sure fail at......
Quit Crying and Just Suck It Up |
|
|
|