|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
31
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 13:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Null-sec industry should be able to provide for the needs of the alliance without relying on high-sec imports, when properly staffed and supported. It shouldn't be relevant to anything happening in high-sec.
Right now, high-sec industry beats null-sec industry by such a margin that imports are more reliable and probably even cheaper than producing locally.
And I won't talk about the need for a carebear adoption program for null-sec cradles to make null-sec industry work.
Making null interact with hi-sec may be by design... and moving stuff around leads to destruction of goods which is a necessary part of EVE. |
Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 16:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Athena Maldoran wrote:This is a secret nerf hisec thread..
No, not secret and yes, they want to nerf hi-sec. The title gave it away. |
Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 16:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Le Badass wrote:Primary Me wrote:There have been a couple of very good threads recently discussing the balance of industry between hisec and nullsec, with some excellent debate and copious amounts of data and examples supporting either side of the argument.
A factor or question that has come up a number of times, but then lost in the depths of economic arguments, is whether nullsec should be on par or better than hisec for industry, which, thinking about it, is a question that needs to be answered first, before discussing any balancing that might need to be done.
So here we go, should nullsec industry be the equal or better than hisec or is the open, risk free hisec industrial machine necessary to keep the forges of Eve burning? Is it simply risk v reward, or more complex than that?
Of course nullsec industry should be better than empire industry, because it totally makes sense that industry is better developed at the fringes of known civilization than in its core.
That's the most confusing part of the argument for null sec having better industry... |
Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 20:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Onomerous wrote:Le Badass wrote:Of course nullsec industry should be better than empire industry, because it totally makes sense that industry is better developed at the fringes of known civilization than in its core. That's the most confusing part of the argument for null sec having better industry... Yes, fallacies such as the one Le Badass just offered are confusing. It's not an actual argument for null having better industry, though, so seeing as how this non-argument is the most confusing one, it can only mean one thing: The actual arguments for that pretty much all make sense, if you happen to know of them.
wtf? Your rebuttal makes no sense... |
Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 20:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Onomerous wrote:Le Badass wrote:Primary Me wrote:There have been a couple of very good threads recently discussing the balance of industry between hisec and nullsec, with some excellent debate and copious amounts of data and examples supporting either side of the argument.
A factor or question that has come up a number of times, but then lost in the depths of economic arguments, is whether nullsec should be on par or better than hisec for industry, which, thinking about it, is a question that needs to be answered first, before discussing any balancing that might need to be done.
So here we go, should nullsec industry be the equal or better than hisec or is the open, risk free hisec industrial machine necessary to keep the forges of Eve burning? Is it simply risk v reward, or more complex than that?
Of course nullsec industry should be better than empire industry, because it totally makes sense that industry is better developed at the fringes of known civilization than in its core. That's the most confusing part of the argument for null sec having better industry... It's only confusing because you've gotten it into your head that that's what nullsec represents, which doesn't actually match up to the reality of nullsec.
So null sec is just as developed as hi-sec? I honestly do not understand your line of thought. |
Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
35
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 13:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kane Alvo wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Kane Alvo wrote:*insanity* Say goodbye to any T2 in highsec then. As it needs moongoo. which means, pretty much, nullsec. Wait. You mean that no one area of space can have everything? Is it possible that they're in some way dependent on each other as part of a bigger picture? That interaction between the two is a necessity by design?Say it ain't so.
shuush you!! No one is supposed to think like that. ;) |
|
|
|