|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
|
ISD Atomic Dove
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
46
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 09:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
Player feedback is welcomed and encouraged, but if you want to pointlessly flame over a change the thread will be locked.
If you're using a thread to complain or vent generally it breeds an unhappy or unhelpful atmosphere and it all goes downhill. We'd like to avoid that
ISD Atomic Dove Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2404
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 12:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts.
The Rules: 12. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a support ticket under the Community & Forums Category. ISD Ezwal Vice Admiral Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1679
|
Posted - 2014.09.29 16:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Here's how feedback works:
- The purpose of feedback is to... well... provide feedback. In other words, it needs to be read by people who can act upon the feedback. If it is in the wrong section, it gets moved. If there's already a dedicated "announcement and feedback" thread, it will get locked and you will get directed to post there instead. The devs read that thread, and really shouldn't have to sift through pages and pages of threads on other topics to get comments on the work they're doing.
- If the feedback is not constructive, it may get deleted or otherwise ignored. There's an ocean of difference between "OMG are u serios halving my damage FIX IT u bums or i quit" and "This change is terrible; halving the damage is an overnerf and means that modules X and Y will be better in almost all circumstances, effectively obsoleting the one you're nerfing. Please reconsider." They're both negative feedback, but one is definitely getting deleted since it contains a personal attack and ranting.
- The thread will only be locked if the OP is so rule-breaking that it get deleted if it were later in the thread, or if the thread has reached a point where even if it were cleaned, the only foreseeable content will be non-constructive. Other than that, threads are simply cleaned of rule-breaking stuff. As always, if you believe a thread has been misjudged, fire off a support ticket to get the higher-ups to look into it.
- When we lock a thread for being a duplicate, we will usually specify what the thread that should be referenced instead is. If we don't, it's probably because it's a very easy to find topic, like this one.
Hope that clears up some stuff. ISD LackOfFaith Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department I do not respond to Eve Mail or anything other than the forums. |
|
|
ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1687
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 13:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sollis Vynneve wrote: Ok so ccp are nerfing light missiles because they believe back in retribution they buffed them 2 much.
Here's the buff, ...
Light missile changes: Gùª Explosion velocity reduced from 50 to 40 Gùª Damage has been increased by 10% (rounded to the closest digit) Gùª Light missile launcher fitting requirements have been reduced by 2 powergrid and 4 CPU
A 10% increase in damage in retribution, so with the pending 6.66% reduction in ROF in Oceanus for light missile launchers wouldn't this put light missile launchers in a worse position then pre-retribution.
suggestion don't nerf ROF.
Post it in the right thread and you've nailed the way to provide good feedback. ISD LackOfFaith Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department I do not respond to Eve Mail or anything other than the forums. |
|
|
|
|