Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tulayia
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 02:56:00 -
[1]
Now that we have a warp to 0km, whats the point of sentry guns? I've, well, my main has been a pirate since beta in eve and ever since sentry guns, I hated them, personally I think they ruined eve. But now, theres warp to 0km, even more safety for travelers. Why must we still have sentry guns. .5+ Space is like 1.0space with the uber target jamming, nosing concord, why can't .4-.1 be like 0.0 cept for station sentry safety?
|
Gamer4liff
Caldari Metalworks THE INTERSTELLAR FOUNDRY
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 03:01:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Gamer4liff on 23/08/2007 03:00:42 oh I don't know maybe TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN LOWSEC AND 0.0
|
Audri Fisher
Caldari VentureCorp Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 03:05:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Gamer4liff Edited by: Gamer4liff on 23/08/2007 03:00:42 oh I don't know maybe TO DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN LOWSEC AND 0.0
the ****poor rats/roids/complexes in lowsec weren't enough?
|
Sazkyen
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 03:11:00 -
[4]
OP: Nah, don't remove them. Let's set the sentries to fire on the attacked
|
Verite Rendition
Caldari AUS Corporation CORE.
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 03:23:00 -
[5]
Sentries still are a decent deterrent to gate camping. Anything smaller than a BC may find itself at risk to a sentry, which limits a camp to only bigger, slower to move, slower to lock ships. Mainly this serves to keep tacklers out of gate camps, which in turn allows for smaller ships to get through. If you got rid of the sentries, it would probably make for more impassible gate camps. ---- AUS Corp Lead Megalomanic |
firepup82
The Ankou The Reckoning.
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 03:31:00 -
[6]
Who cares. My nighthawk can tank them just fine.
|
Fester Addams
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 03:33:00 -
[7]
They were never really needed, they were however implemented for a reason.
I very much doubt that that reason is no longer an issue.
In any case, lowsec is empire, there is no Concord but it makes sence that the large throughways are guarded by automated systems.
|
Tortun Nahme
Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 03:36:00 -
[8]
even if they arent necessary, are they unnecessary?
Why there should be a breathalyzer to login to Eve-Forums:
Quote: Smacking my own alt in a nerf-thread while drunk, he was irritating a Hauler full of tech II n00bs, Oops.
|
elorran
Minmatar Ante Matter Soldiers of the Forgotten Abyss
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 03:50:00 -
[9]
Low security, still has to have some degree of "security". Otherwise it might as well be called 0.0
- - Ante Matter - Soldiers of the Forgotten Abyss
|
Lisento Slaven
Amarr Vendetta Underground Rule of Three
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 04:06:00 -
[10]
You'll see a lot more gate camps in lowsec if they remove sentries. As it stands right now people have to be able to tank the sentry fire for at least a little while. If you remove them I could...I mean...the evil people could just sit there in any ship they want and own everyone who comes in.
I don't care what anyone says. When those sentry guns are not aiming at your friends or your drones, they can hurt =P ---
Put in space whales!
|
|
Tulayia
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 04:08:00 -
[11]
No, low sec would be called low sec because you would have security at a station. How is it fair to have indestructable sentries + have a 15 minute criminal timer. INDESTRUCTABLE SENTRIES... how is that fair?
|
Tulayia
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 04:09:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Lisento Slaven You'll see a lot more gate camps in lowsec if they remove sentries. As it stands right now people have to be able to tank the sentry fire for at least a little while. If you remove them I could...I mean...the evil people could just sit there in any ship they want and own everyone who comes in.
I don't care what anyone says. When those sentry guns are not aiming at your friends or your drones, they can hurt =P
I guess CCP promotes solo traveling but not solo pirating.. Thats really smart yea..
|
Tonkin
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 04:12:00 -
[13]
i think 0.4 should have 4 sentrys 0.3 3 sentrys 0.2 2 sentrys etc
making sec status have a f**in meaning
|
Tulayia
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 04:36:00 -
[14]
Sec status does have a meaning.
Different ores, Increased Loyalty points from Agents the lower sec you go. Why do you guys want a free ride all the time. Why must you be that much safer? Why is it balanced for there to be INDESTRUCTABLE sentries at every gate in low sec. Why do you want CCP to do all your fighting?
|
Solid Wilko
Finis Lumen
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 04:37:00 -
[15]
I post this as I finish devouring a delicious sandwich I just made after I turned my hardners on while I tank sentreis AFK in my Claymore.
Keep sentries of I may forget I'm even logged in to be honest (sents do jack all unless your in a domi and they own your drones anyway
|
Neuvik
Caldari Caldari Legion
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 04:46:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Tulayia 5+ Space is like 1.0space with the uber target jamming, nosing concord, why can't .4-.1 be like 0.0 cept for station sentry safety?
umm, why cant you just go to 0.0, there are no sentry guns there --------
for (i=0; i<n=1337; i++} {while (start sig != true) if (sig_within_rules(sig)) {show sig;}} Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Sahwoolo Etoophie ([email protected]) ------ |
Captian Internet
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 04:52:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Neuvik
Originally by: Tulayia 5+ Space is like 1.0space with the uber target jamming, nosing concord, why can't .4-.1 be like 0.0 cept for station sentry safety?
umm, why cant you just go to 0.0, there are no sentry guns there
Because all the good loots are getting cyno'd out
|
Tulayia
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 04:57:00 -
[18]
Ok, you go tank the sentries and fight me 1v1, see who wins.. I bet you 9billion isk, which is all my isk, youll lose.
|
Hanrasen Nia
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 08:16:00 -
[19]
Ha! I know I'd gatecamp a helluva lot more.
|
Kahleena
W.L.A.M.O.
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 09:11:00 -
[20]
What's the point of sentries? They make gate-camps a little more complicated and harder to do solo. And although we no longer get the guys who warp to 0km, the guys who come through the gate, appear at 15km (ripe for warp disruption) and start shaking when they see us sitting at 0km from the gate with sentry drones deployed and a sensor booster appreciate those sentry guns.
-K
|
|
Meleira Luan
Tiger Trading
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 09:21:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Tulayia No, low sec would be called low sec because you would have security at a station. How is it fair to have indestructable sentries + have a 15 minute criminal timer. INDESTRUCTABLE SENTRIES... how is that fair?
For heavens sake, stop whining about fairness - you are the one shooting defenceless victims. Get a grip.
|
Hellspawn01
Amarr Falcon Advanced Industries
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 09:37:00 -
[22]
You wouldnt ask for such a stupid change if you would play as long as you claim to. Post with your main and we can start talking seriously.
Ship lovers click here |
Lysit Kaune
Minmatar Phoenix Division The Imperial Order
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 10:38:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Tulayia No, low sec would be called low sec because you would have security at a station. How is it fair to have indestructable sentries + have a 15 minute criminal timer. INDESTRUCTABLE SENTRIES... how is that fair?
I believe your looking for somewhere to shoot people, that lacks both concord and sentries? Its called 0.0, feel free to join us sometime.
|
Leandro Salazar
The Blackguard Wolves Knights Of the Southerncross
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 10:53:00 -
[24]
Sentries are the only thing that keeps the speed insanity somewhat in check in lowsec. So they do serve an important purpose for those few of us who do NOT enjoy every ship going 5000+...
Fix speedtanks, base hit chance on agility! |
MITSUK0
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 10:57:00 -
[25]
As a frigate ***** I would love sentrys removed
Either that or just MORE places to have fights, like the complexes only not deadspace and much more common, just anything that would attract people so you know "oh I can go to <insert place in space> and probs find a fight". It really is hard to find fights in lowsec if you cannot tank sentries.
|
Agor Dirdonen
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 11:15:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Tulayia No, low sec would be called low sec because you would have security at a station.
*** 6 months in the future ****
CCP why are there sentry guns at the station?... it's low sec for a reason. Low sec as in 'lower' security? There shouldn't be protection at the stations!!! Gates don't have sentries either so remove them from station too please!!!
|
Rufus Toya
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 12:41:00 -
[27]
your face is a sentry gun
pwnt
|
Bizz Lizz
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 13:09:00 -
[28]
Edited by: Bizz Lizz on 23/08/2007 13:10:15
Originally by: Tortun Nahme even if they arent necessary, are they unnecessary?
Is there a difference between not necessary and unnecessary ? I'm confused. Language barreer perhaps. Anyway, removing sentries would turn low sec into something like 0.0 without bubbles, which would mean that people couldn't move around in bigger ships in low sec without a (decent) gang anymore due to frigs and cruisers camping gates and patrolling low sec travelroutes all the time.
|
Ogul
Caldari ZiTek Deepspace Explorations Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 13:14:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Tulayia Why is it balanced for there to be INDESTRUCTABLE sentries at every gate in low sec. Why do you want CCP to do all your fighting?
What's even worse is that you cannot disrupt supply routes because of those completely imbalanced and INDESTRUCTABLE gates!
Seriously, this needs to be fixed.
--- This is a war declaration, issued from your alt corp. It is used to gank people in high sec. |
Joey Judas
Gallente Ramraiders
|
Posted - 2007.08.23 13:30:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Tonkin i think 0.4 should have 4 sentrys 0.3 3 sentrys 0.2 2 sentrys etc
making sec status have a f**in meaning
I second this statement
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |