|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Karadion
394
|
Posted - 2012.02.10 23:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
There is no god but Solo Drakban and The Mittani is his messenger. |
Karadion
403
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 00:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
This thread has more likes than the other candidates.. |
Karadion
413
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 18:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
HELIC0N ONE wrote:Shazzam Vokanavom wrote:Oh and pretending he has CCP's ear by having a few drinks with them whilst in holiday mode, interesting that he claims to be the main driving force of change here, whereas the summer of player protesting had absolutley nothing to do with CCP's U-turn on WiS. How foolish to think that face-to-face human interaction would have any effect on decision making processes. Clearly the actions of anonymous spaceship characters at their computers is far more convincing. If he got out of his parent's basement and made friends, he'd realize that he can disprove his own argument when he gains social skills. |
Karadion
414
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 19:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:You just don't get it do you?
Sure Mittani will buy hundreds of votes and because of this he has a good chance of winning. However I will play by the rules and stick to my values so that by the end of this election people will see that even a hipster-godking can bleed. I'm still poor. Where's my bailout The Mittani! |
Karadion
435
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 20:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Here's a simple question that Princess can answer. If there is nothing NDA breaching, then are you saying that the entire minutes in that meeting can be given out without question? IE if Darius were to give out the entire minutes under the argument by using their statement that few lines Darius intentionally leaked wasn't NDA breaking therefore the rest of the minutes must not be NDA breaking. Would that still be okay with you? The fact is, Darius did leak specific minutes from a meeting under NDA and the rest of the CSM6 team can't trust him anymore not to leak anymore minutes for his own gain. |
Karadion
435
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 21:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
Princess Bride wrote:Karadion wrote:Here's a simple question that Princess can answer. If there is nothing NDA breaching, then are you saying that the entire minutes in that meeting can be given out without question? IE if Darius were to give out the entire minutes under the argument by using their statement that few lines Darius intentionally leaked wasn't NDA breaking therefore the rest of the minutes must not be NDA breaking. Would that still be okay with you? The fact is, Darius did leak specific minutes from a meeting under NDA and the rest of the CSM6 team can't trust him anymore not to leak anymore minutes for his own gain. Hypothetical question is hypothetical. I won't entertain them and choose instead to look at the factual questions that actually happened. If a frog had wings, it would not repetitively impact its own posterior. However a frog does not have wings, and the situation you lay out above did not happen and so it does not matter. Yes, exactly. You choose to selectively pick out what you want to make your point for your BFF. Fact is Darius did leak minutes from an NDA meeting where they were all under the impression that the minutes were not going to be given out. The specific parts of the minutes were deemed by CCP not to be critical but if it had compromised of information based on such as Tech moons are going to be nerfed / other moons are going to be buffed, then CCP would be freaking out. But this one was based on insulting Riverini in an NDA meeting, a corp mate of Darius, and Darius didn't like that so he told Riverini. |
Karadion
436
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 22:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
Princess Bride wrote:Karadion wrote:Princess Bride wrote:Karadion wrote:Here's a simple question that Princess can answer. If there is nothing NDA breaching, then are you saying that the entire minutes in that meeting can be given out without question? IE if Darius were to give out the entire minutes under the argument by using their statement that few lines Darius intentionally leaked wasn't NDA breaking therefore the rest of the minutes must not be NDA breaking. Would that still be okay with you? The fact is, Darius did leak specific minutes from a meeting under NDA and the rest of the CSM6 team can't trust him anymore not to leak anymore minutes for his own gain. Hypothetical question is hypothetical. I won't entertain them and choose instead to look at the factual questions that actually happened. If a frog had wings, it would not repetitively impact its own posterior. However a frog does not have wings, and the situation you lay out above did not happen and so it does not matter. Yes, exactly. You choose to selectively pick out what you want to make your point for your BFF. Fact is Darius did leak minutes from an NDA meeting where they were all under the impression that the minutes were not going to be given out. The specific parts of the minutes were deemed by CCP not to be critical but if it had compromised of information based on such as Tech moons are going to be nerfed / other moons are going to be buffed, then CCP would be freaking out. But this one was based on insulting Riverini in an NDA meeting, a corp mate of Darius, and Darius didn't like that so he told Riverini. So by your own admission, Mittani's characterization of Darius III in his one-line insult/summary was based on something completely irrelevant. Also, by ignoring your lame hypothetical I'm "picking and choosing" my facts? No. I'm distinguishing facts from hypothetical garbage. That's different. It may have been based on something trivial but facts is that it came from an NDA meeting, did it not? Yes or no. |
Karadion
436
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 22:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Princess Bride wrote:Quote: It may have been based on something trivial but facts is that it came from an NDA meeting, did it not? Yes or no.
What's a NDA meeting? Yes or no, did the trivial statements come from a meeting that was under NDA. That's it. That's all I want to hear. Yes or no. |
Karadion
436
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 22:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Princess Bride wrote:Karadion wrote:Princess Bride wrote:Quote: It may have been based on something trivial but facts is that it came from an NDA meeting, did it not? Yes or no.
What's a NDA meeting? Yes or no, did the trivial statements come from a meeting that was under NDA. That's it. That's all I want to hear. Yes or no. Yes or no. Now that you've heard all you want to hear, perhaps you'll now answer MY question? What's a NDA meeting? I still haven't gotten my answer.
Did the trivial statements come from a meeting that was under NDA. Yes or no. |
Karadion
436
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 22:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
Princess Bride wrote:Karadion wrote:I still haven't gotten my answer.
Did the trivial statements come from a meeting that was under NDA. Yes or no. You still haven't clarified your question. When you do, I will answer. Are the contents of the minutes in that meeting under NDA. You know this answer. The answer is yes. Back to you, Bob.
Did the trivial statements come from a meeting that was under NDA. Yes or no. |
|
Karadion
436
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 22:51:00 -
[11] - Quote
Princess Bride wrote:Karadion wrote:Princess Bride wrote:Karadion wrote:I still haven't gotten my answer.
Did the trivial statements come from a meeting that was under NDA. Yes or no. You still haven't clarified your question. When you do, I will answer. Are the contents of the minutes in that meeting under NDA. You know this answer. The answer is yes. Back to you, Bob. Did the trivial statements come from a meeting that was under NDA. Yes or no. If the statements that were "leaked" came from a meeting that was covered by the NDA between CCP and the CSM, then evidence of the leaks (which we all acknowledge exist) would have been evidence of a breach of the NDA. As CCP has clearly stated, they have seen no evidence of a breach of the NDA, therefore, the meeting was not covered under the NDA. Yes or no. You have a reading comprehension of a child. Prove me wrong. |
Karadion
436
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 23:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Princess Bride wrote:Karadion wrote:Princess Bride wrote: If the statements that were "leaked" came from a meeting that was covered by the NDA between CCP and the CSM, then evidence of the leaks (which we all acknowledge exist) would have been evidence of a breach of the NDA. As CCP has clearly stated, they have seen no evidence of a breach of the NDA, therefore, the meeting was not covered under the NDA.
Yes or no. You have a reading comprehension of a child. Prove me wrong. Wow. Okay, to clarify for the literalists: If the statements that were "leaked" came from a meeting that was covered by the NDA between CCP and the CSM, then evidence of the leaks (which we all acknowledge exist) would have been evidence of a breach of the NDA. As CCP has clearly stated, they have seen no evidence of a breach of the NDA, therefore, NO the meeting was not covered under the NDA. Proof: CCP Diagoras wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Didn't get enough NDA leaking during CSM6?
We have not seen evidence of any NDA breaches. Should you have any, please feel free to contact us via the petition system.
I didn't ask for that answer. Yes or no. That's all I wanted. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
437
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 23:15:00 -
[13] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Will you ignore everything I asked you?
Most likely yes. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
437
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 23:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
I like how Mittani's second post on the first page has been blanked out. Who is CCP defending? The pedophile? The David Duke fan? The Ayn Rand fanboy? The morbidly obese? Or the NDA breaking CSM failure? |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
437
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 23:21:00 -
[15] - Quote
Darius III wrote:Karadion wrote:Xenuria wrote:Will you ignore everything I asked you?
Most likely yes. He isn't saying much to anyone it seems. Whats the matter Mittani-cat got your tongue? If you want to answer the pedophile, by all means, go for it. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
437
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 23:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Karadion wrote:I like how Mittani's post has been blanked out. Who is CCP defending? The pedophile? The David Duke fan? The Ayn Rand fanboy? The morbidly obese? Or the NDA breaking CSM failure? Personal attacks are not allowed on the forums. Please tell me more about how you're so going to win the CSM election. If you want to put down a wager, I'm fine with that. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
437
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 23:27:00 -
[17] - Quote
Darius III wrote:Karadion wrote:I like how Mittani's second post on the first page has been blanked out. Who is CCP defending? The pedophile? The David Duke fan? The Ayn Rand fanboy? The morbidly obese? Or the NDA breaking CSM failure? >Protip: There was never a violation of the NDA Protip: Tell it to someone who cares. Like Princess Bride. At least at my job, I uphold the NDA agreements that I made with my company so that my co-workers and boss can trust me. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
437
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 23:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Karadion wrote:Darius III wrote:Karadion wrote:I like how Mittani's second post on the first page has been blanked out. Who is CCP defending? The pedophile? The David Duke fan? The Ayn Rand fanboy? The morbidly obese? Or the NDA breaking CSM failure? >Protip: There was never a violation of the NDA Protip: Tell it to someone who cares. Like Princess Bride. At least at my job, I uphold the NDA agreements that I made with my company so that my co-workers and boss can trust me. Wait so you claim that he broke the NDA and then when he and everybody else says he did no such thing you suddenly pull the "I don't care" card. Are you 12? I hope you know saying you don't care when you have clearly lost the argument is NOT a sign of maturity rather the opposite. The lines did come from a meeting that was under NDA. Darius may have been excused at what is NDA breaking or not but when the scripts came from a meeting under NDA, you pretty much undermine the confidence of other CSM members that you're supposed to work with. Darius is just being an anti-CSM candidate because he wants free trips to Iceland although he's contributed NOTHING to the CSM.
I'm not from the Langer School of Thoughts (Retards) so I don't care if I don't meet your requirements for winning or losing arguments. Especially since I never did any such circumstances of defining the goals or who have won such an argument.
But hey, I'm not the one here that has a problem with pedophilia. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
438
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 00:57:00 -
[19] - Quote
Sniperlove wrote:Karadion wrote:
But hey, I'm not the one here that has a problem with pedophilia.
Wait.....what? are you telling me it is okay for someone to sexually assault a child? If this is true you need to re-evaluate your life, your existance and your moral beliefs, or maybe re-evaluate those times your uncle invited you over when you were 5? You are terrible at reading. |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
441
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 14:59:00 -
[20] - Quote
Sniperlove wrote:Just remember guys, people who support pedophilia support Xenuria,
By supporting Xenuria you partner along with these people who think violating the virginity of children is acceptable............
But what do I know? I'm a dumb pubbie. Don't forget to ask Xenuria about hockles. He'll tell you all about it. |
|
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
441
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 01:28:00 -
[21] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:Well Mittani now that you are assured enough votes you seem unwilling to respond on particular issues. We don't need dickgirls and twatguys especially for any future scenario where WiS might become a part of this game. Stop trying. (9:06 PM) aaronkb@optonlin: all of your deeds wil be forgiven if u go on cam and pose nude for me-á |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
443
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 17:07:00 -
[22] - Quote
Clyde ElectraGlide wrote:High Heel wrote:Mittens:
Why you hate Titans and SuperC's So much? Do they make you angry cause you can't afford them or what is it?
Why do you want to limit the game to subSupercap warfare? That is basically saying 400 VS 500. the ones whit 500 wins. So you are basicly supporting larger and larger fleetfights? Hahahaha oh man you must be trolling there's no way that this post is serious The CFC (as pointed out above) can and does afford as many supercaps and titans as they would ever need. I think it says something when the coalition with the most supercaps in the game wants them nerfed. Oh god that guy might come in and say "Then the Goons must not have the most supercap in the game then!" with his dumb logic. (9:06 PM) aaronkb@optonlin: all of your deeds wil be forgiven if u go on cam and pose nude for me-á |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
444
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 14:42:00 -
[23] - Quote
There is no god but Solo Drakban and The Mittani is his messenger. (9:06 PM) aaronkb@optonlin: all of your deeds wil be forgiven if u go on cam and pose nude for me-á |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
445
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 16:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
DaarMaar wrote:The time for honoring yourself will soon be at an end.. Still got 6 more days left in this Deklein by February! Hurry up :) (9:06 PM) aaronkb@optonlin: all of your deeds wil be forgiven if u go on cam and pose nude for me-á |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
450
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 23:29:00 -
[25] - Quote
VaL Iscariot wrote:I guess this guy wants my approval for a free trip to Iceland eerrr I mean vote. What about the others? For example, Darius wanted a free trip to Iceland despite doing nothing on the CSM. (9:06 PM) aaronkb@optonlin: all of your deeds wil be forgiven if u go on cam and pose nude for me-á |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
452
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 08:16:00 -
[26] - Quote
To piss you off. (9:06 PM) aaronkb@optonlin: all of your deeds wil be forgiven if u go on cam and pose nude for me-á |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
453
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 10:14:00 -
[27] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:what is this, some alex jones wackjob bullshit? is mittani like the eve-o infowars obama? No, that's Riverini. Useless, fat and dumb like your Alex Jones. (9:06 PM) aaronkb@optonlin: all of your deeds wil be forgiven if u go on cam and pose nude for me-á |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
465
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 05:05:00 -
[28] - Quote
Princess Bride wrote:Yes, everyone, please completely ignore the primary and secondary definitions. Only look at the tertiary. Nothing to see in 1 and 2, move along, nothing to see here! Wow you are really dumb, are you? English words always have had multiple meanings in the English language. There is no primary or tertiary BS. They're listed in the order of the most common meaning to the least common meaning in other words they're all primary definitions depending on the usage one uses. The English language has always been a very complex language and no one denies that. Another example, a friend of mine who served on a LDS mission to Croatia have said that it's the same way like English there where for example using the a certain word three times in a row will have a different meaning from each other.
What do I know? I'm a deaf stupid goon. Deafies are like really dumb people who aren't really human by any means. They're like gingers. They have no soul. (9:06 PM) aaronkb@optonlin: all of your deeds wil be forgiven if u go on cam and pose nude for me-á |
Karadion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
515
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 16:20:00 -
[29] - Quote
We have a mandate! |
|
|
|