| Pages: [1] |
1. BARRAGE - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Cease your complaining or the great Tux will increase the sig radius on Assault Frigs again
- by Frezik - at 2006.11.18 05:44:00
|
2. Why Caldaris are NOT the winners of Kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Err, actually, Amarr are the only ones that spec in one weapon system. Actualy, we spec projectiles and lasers ;) OK . . . Amarr are the only ones who are supposed to spec in one weapon system.
- by Frezik - at 2006.11.06 03:32:00
|
3. Why Caldaris are NOT the winners of Kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Atar Edited by: Atar on 05/11/2006 08:23:40 The problem is no other race has two completely different weapon types to chose from and that fault is when the game was first introduced. The game, when first introduced, ...
- by Frezik - at 2006.11.06 00:00:00
|
4. Why Caldaris are NOT the winners of Kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Christopher Scott Edited by: Christopher Scott on 05/11/2006 03:27:23 Originally by: Logan Xerxes YOu're an idiot if you haven't trained up hybrid skills as a caldari, it's like a Gallente not training up drones...
- by Frezik - at 2006.11.05 03:35:00
|
5. Purpose of RAVEN in kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Leianna Easier to train for guns? spoken like a true noob caldari. Seriously did you even think before you posted? He was speaking of a full missile spec, which is indeed harder than specing for a set of turrents. Missi...
- by Frezik - at 2006.10.28 03:34:00
|
6. Purpose of RAVEN in kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: babylonstew next time you complain about that abbadon runnign out of cap, ill remind you its ok to bring a friend to use cap transfers for you then? as i mean, according to you, a bs needs 1 support pilot right? Sounds g...
- by Frezik - at 2006.10.26 18:16:00
|
7. Purpose of RAVEN in kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Matyae Edited by: Matyae on 26/10/2006 14:35:20 Originally by: Frezik Kali ==== Normalized damage: 540 * 0.667 = 360.18 Normalized damage w/TP: 540 * 0.833 = 449.82 This is not a nerf to rage torps, simply a cha...
- by Frezik - at 2006.10.26 18:14:00
|
8. Purpose of RAVEN in kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Grim Vandal It's retarded that for any other ship type but interceptors or vagabonds missiles explosion velocity has nearly no to no effect at all. Snake implants and specialized setups (<3 nanophoon) can do it, too.
- by Frezik - at 2006.10.26 14:22:00
|
9. Purpose of RAVEN in kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Zar Dim T2 Rages with 1 TP : 540 * 400*1.3/600 = 468 [see how Frezik cheated in his calculations putting old rages damages] T1 Torps 450*400/400= 450 Difference is minimal You're right, I did accidentally use the current...
- by Frezik - at 2006.10.26 14:18:00
|
10. Purpose of RAVEN in kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Edited by: Frezik on 26/10/2006 02:30:47 Kali ==== Normalized Damage = 415.8 Damage w/Skills = 415.8 * 1.35 = 561.33 Burst Damage = 561.33 * 6 = 3367.98 DPS = 3367.98 / 11.19 = 301.0 DPS 1xBCS I = (3367.98 * 1.07) / (11.19 * (1-0.075)) = 348.2...
- by Frezik - at 2006.10.26 02:30:00
|
11. Purpose of RAVEN in kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Kamikaaazi you are lucky if you break 600 dps with 4 bcs II. Do some math before talking bull****. Since you asked so nicely . . . f(1) = 1 f(2) = 0.8708860 f(3) = 0.5705831 f(4) = 0.2829552 BCS I - 7% dmg, 7.5% ROF B...
- by Frezik - at 2006.10.26 02:29:00
|
12. Purpose of RAVEN in kali - in Revelations Testing and Development [original thread]
Originally by: Kamikaaazi T2 rage torps get their flight time decreased (20 sec > 10 sec). Allso they get their damage decreased (675 > 540). Explosion radius was decreased from 1000 to 600. 20% cap recharge penalty. The explosio...
- by Frezik - at 2006.10.25 20:06:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |