| Pages: [1] |
1. CSM Formal Meeting 4. Thursday 12th June. 20:00hours Eve Time - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I'd see it entirely on CCP for the exclusion of non-europeans from the meeting. The fact this had to happen during the week is going to be exclusive for at least one timezone. In the future these things should only happen during weekends to allow ...
- by Halca - at 2008.06.13 13:39:00
|
2. Rotating chairman(/woman) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
You seemed to handle chairing the fourth meeting pretty well and I was genuinely impressed with how you guys handled yourselves. It gave me hope that this whole thing can be salvaged. I'd say the rotation is a great idea as long as sanctions are b...
- by Halca - at 2008.06.13 08:46:00
|
3. Results of csm meetings - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Halca on 12/06/2008 14:18:32 edited because I was completely wrong
- by Halca - at 2008.06.12 14:17:00
|
4. The CSM do not represent the best interests of EVE. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Jade Constantine Edited by: Jade Constantine on 11/06/2008 16:10:47 Originally by: Halca I'm on no side you presumptuous twit Quote: And preempting your inevitable mock outrage that I dare to hold yo...
- by Halca - at 2008.06.11 16:28:00
|
5. The CSM do not represent the best interests of EVE. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Halca on 11/06/2008 16:01:19 Originally by: Jade Constantine Originally by: Halca Originally by: Jade Constantine This is insane. For you to have the gall to put this on the other members of the council...
- by Halca - at 2008.06.11 16:01:00
|
6. The CSM do not represent the best interests of EVE. - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Jade Constantine This is insane. For you to have the gall to put this on the other members of the council when you have undeniably been proven through the chatlogs to have been one of the two main instigators of CSM ru...
- by Halca - at 2008.06.11 15:49:00
|
7. CSM Formal Meeting 3. Sunday 8th June (18:00 hours eve time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Kelsin Originally by: Halca The equality statement is there to allow alternates to vote with equal voice while they are substituting. It does not state anywhere that they should remain in the meeting for any length o...
- by Halca - at 2008.06.11 13:12:00
|
8. CSM Formal Meeting 3. Sunday 8th June (18:00 hours eve time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Halca on 11/06/2008 12:42:12 Originally by: Kelsin Originally by: Halca They are only equal in the context of when they are substituted for an absent member. I don't understand how you guys struggle with this concept...
- by Halca - at 2008.06.11 12:42:00
|
9. CSM Formal Meeting 3. Sunday 8th June (18:00 hours eve time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Halca on 11/06/2008 12:21:14 Originally by: Kelsin Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto Even if we take the fanciful assumption that SCOTUS decisions are binding upon an Icelandic private corporation's advisory body, the...
- by Halca - at 2008.06.11 12:21:00
|
10. CSM Formal Meeting 3. Sunday 8th June (18:00 hours eve time) - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Jade Constantine Edited by: Jade Constantine on 09/06/2008 15:25:24 Originally by: Darius JOHNSON Jade: The motion to kick alternates out of the room when a CSM has showed up late has passed. Rest of CSM: That'...
- by Halca - at 2008.06.09 15:28:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |