| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] |
101. Change interceptors to INTERCEPTORS! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Jimmycs83 on 05/05/2006 00:33:37 well maya you just seem to think that if you take a dmg bonus away from an interceptor and replace it with a tackling bonus then all inties would be useless .. which is complete rubbish. Personally i...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.05.05 00:33:00
|
102. Change interceptors to INTERCEPTORS! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Maya Rkell And right, you really think that a "mixed" fleet would use expensive inties rather than very very nearly as effective T1 frigs? You CAN throw them away, and close to within 7.5km for 2 point jams. yeah i rea...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.05.05 00:19:00
|
103. Change interceptors to INTERCEPTORS! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Hllaxiu Originally by: Jimmycs83 because they fill too many roles which discourages team play which is what this is all about .. right? 1 interceptor on their own can't do too much as it is - you need larger grou...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.05.05 00:11:00
|
104. Change interceptors to INTERCEPTORS! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Maya Rkell INTERCEPTORS ARE COMBAT SHIPS AND ALLWAYS HAVE BEEN, GET OVER IT. And sigh, fleet defence is generally NOT within Nos range of the enemy. the point bieng then that they shouldnt be. How they are now, or were ...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.05.04 23:52:00
|
105. The math of blaster tweaks.. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: DigitalCommunist Its my opinion that these changes are a tribute to all the blaster whining, with no effort being made at understanding the source of it. this pretty much sums up what i thought when i read the proposed ...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.05.04 22:56:00
|
106. WCS - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
yeah i think what gets on everyone nerves is not that the guys mining and npcing in empire low sec fit them, but rather the people who go into PvP where both sides are risking there ships only to have some guy warp off. People will also say that ...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.04.25 19:25:00
|
107. predictions...small vs. big??? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
small effective alliances that can hold their own conquerable stations/outposts died when they brought in capital ships. Soon they will all either be working very closely together with their neighbours (read completely reliant on their bigger/badd...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.04.22 11:51:00
|
108. Declare War Threads? - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
well most mercs post em coz they rely on their reputation to get new contracts and also in genereal the better their rep the more they can charge, hence letting everyone know when and how well their wars are going is going to benefit them quite a ...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.04.22 11:40:00
|
109. 11.5mil sp player looking for 0.0 based corp/alliance - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
thanks for all the offers here and ingame. Currently still removing roles from my corp so will be considering all my options till then and contacting people with a few question etc thanks again Jimmy
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.04.09 13:41:00
|
110. 11.5mil sp player looking for 0.0 based corp/alliance - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Edited by: Jimmycs83 on 09/04/2006 01:19:09 hi looking for a new corp having given up on trying to make my own PvP corp work (just didnt seem to have enough time to do any recruiting and bieng such a small and new outfit found it hard to attra...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.04.09 01:16:00
|
111. Tier 3 Battleship - design yours! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
well, while i agree that we do need some new BSs i just dont think making them more powerful than the current ones we have is the way to go. The way i see it the current tier 2 BSs represent the final product of the empires research into their mai...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.04.05 17:05:00
|
112. Piracy in the future of Eve - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: Doc Extropy Originally by: Deja Thoris Originally by: Doc Extropy I hope, that someday the antisocial behaviour of so called "piracy" will be completely eliminated from Eve so people can go about their busine...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.04.01 15:57:00
|
113. Piracy in the future of Eve - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: Yee Do Originally by: Spahn X I agree as well. Pirating in EVE isn't even pirating, generally. Rather more like homicide. A genuine pirate isn't in it for the thrill of killing people, but is in it to take their stuf...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.04.01 01:42:00
|
114. Piracy in the future of Eve - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: Yee Do How do you make piracy more attractive without it becoming a conflicting issue on non-pirates/paying customers? Firstly we all know that non-pirates are are paying customers so no need for the reminder to CCP My...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.03.31 23:23:00
|
115. Piracy in the future of Eve - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Saw this in my local paper and it reminded me of how i think piracy really should be .. This article, which first appeared in the Barrow News in November 1949, describes some of the cloak-and-dagger activities which took place off the Furness an...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.03.31 21:38:00
|
116. My first vid - in My EVE [original thread]
Edited by: Jimmycs83 on 11/03/2006 16:21:41 well i wasnt going to post this vid here as it was just a trial run to see how difficult all this vid making was. I changed my mind however on seeing the poor quality of the final vid and not bieng a...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.03.11 16:11:00
|
117. UCC Involvement in Tenal *Official* - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Cer'es Edited by: Cer''es on 10/03/2006 23:11:37 Originally by: In'Nala We were competing against ourselves. And on that point I believe we were victorious. well done on beating yourself. ty. infact we b...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.03.10 23:51:00
|
118. *Official UCC Announcement* UCC become hostile to IRON/G/ect - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Heptameron ...Working alongside KOS did not help your cause.... Actually we haven't been working alongside Celtic Anarchy, we were at war with them for a week thanks to an ex-UCC member hiring them against us, and they ...
- by Jimmycs83 - at 2006.02.27 12:24:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |