| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2081. Tear Report - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The best example of spaceship tears I've seen.
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.07 09:53:00
|
2082. CCP Economics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
And The Dadaist replies Twinkies.
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.07 09:32:00
|
2083. CCP Economics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Vortexo VonBrenner wrote: Sorry, allow me to expand that: EVE, fulla nerds an' geeks . Yeah but we need the rest of the population, I believe they are called service station attendants, to fill in as pvp grunts. It's a...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.07 06:36:00
|
2084. 10 minute cyno - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Othran wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Light Cyno in Noobship > Jump to Cyno > Logoff Cyno alt. Takes about 45 seconds if I'm on the ball (I'm usually not). This. Also this is why current cyno mechanics are stupid. When was the last time y...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.07 06:34:00
|
2085. CCP Economics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Verily, vectors vex even the most victoriously vast intellects. That was a nice comment I was expecting you to be mean . A which point I was going to suggest a deviation from your current plot . ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.07 05:13:00
|
2086. CCP Economics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Frying Doom wrote: I am not sure how to scale that comment Perhaps Parametrically ? I'm not sure if that comment was in nominal range of my intellect Verily, vectors vex even the most vict...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.07 04:42:00
|
2087. CCP Economics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: I am not sure how to scale that comment Perhaps Parametrically ?
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.07 04:26:00
|
2088. 10 minute cyno - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Light Cyno > Jump to Cyno > Logoff Cyno alt. Takes about 45 seconds if I'm on the ball (I'm usually not).
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.07 04:20:00
|
2089. CCP Economics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: ElQuirko wrote: Frying Doom wrote: Graphs rule the world, if you don't believe that you must be a graphist. No no, I'm a follower. I guess you could call me a... graphite. Well it is good to hear you are on the ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.07 04:17:00
|
2090. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: So to bring everything back up to speed... Lord Zim says Concord Protects, Baltec1 says it's bannable to use Concord for protection, Ruby says Concord doesn't prevent, but deters, and Murk says that Concord is a cost assess...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 22:46:00
|
2091. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Murk Paradox wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Give it a shot. Just add Rancer to your waypoint list. Sure, just remove concord and I'll give it a go. Rancer has no CONCORD, so you're all set. So i...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 20:43:00
|
2092. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: So you can deter but not prevent? Is that what you're saying? Your post is a tad contradictory. In what way is it contradictory.
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 20:41:00
|
2093. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Give it a shot. Just add Rancer to your waypoint list. Sure, just remove concord and I'll give it a go. Rancer has no CONCORD, so you're all set.
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 20:39:00
|
2094. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Murk Paradox wrote: I've done it for 56 jumps from Jel to Stain. But GENERALLY expect? Hard to answer. I went through every sector of space except WH space. But no trip has ever been the exact same so ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 20:34:00
|
2095. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: baltec1 wrote: Wrong. Spawning concord in a belt to protect yourself is bannable. Spawning concord to move them from a belt is not a bannable offence. They are not the same. So using Concord for protection is bannab...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 20:32:00
|
2096. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: Protection comes as a by product, but does not define what Concord is. So Concord does provide protection. Well hey, I think we're done here.
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 19:25:00
|
2097. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Murk Paradox wrote: Because chaos is the enemy of order. It is unwanted . therefore discouraged from being present. Unwanted by whom? Who does Chaos hurt? If CONCORD has no effect on the victims,...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 19:24:00
|
2098. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: Because chaos is the enemy of order. It is unwanted . therefore discouraged from being present. Unwanted by whom? Who does Chaos hurt? If CONCORD has no effect on the victims, why do they keep calling for it to be buffed?
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 19:10:00
|
2099. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Murk Paradox wrote: I think we know which one fits Concord better. Ok, then to what purpose do you think CONCORD punishes Criminals if not to protect their would-be or actual victims? To "det...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 19:06:00
|
2100. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Murk Paradox wrote: I think we know which one fits Concord better. Ok, then to what purpose do you think CONCORD punishes Criminals if not to protect their would-be or actual victims?
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.04.06 18:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |