| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. hi sec carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Will do =ƒÿü=ƒÿé
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.05.17 21:50:24
|
2. hi sec carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
To be honest, I am not even sure what the dps is for non-bonused light fighters. Do you have any idea what a squadron of a space superiority fighters would do in terms of DPS?
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.05.17 20:23:31
|
3. hi sec carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@Lugh I like your idea with the support fighters on the sub cap carrier. I would probably leave the with the ability to field one squadron of light fighters for at least some damage and self-protection. As for the fighters themselves I could se...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.05.17 19:52:05
|
4. hi sec carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@Lugh If used for ganking at gates or in Jita or wherever ganking will takes place in hisec, the ship is going to be destroyed by Concord as is already the case. That is not new. If used as part of an ongoing war you I guess you can do the gatec...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.05.12 14:27:02
|
5. hi sec carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@Rivr I understand your position, but I do not agree. I think this is a matter where I think we can agree to disagree. I may have agreed with you before the Citadel expansion when the fighters were introduced to hisec, but that expansion changed ...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.05.12 11:37:03
|
6. hi sec carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@Danika As I mentioned in one of my previous comments the point is to have a ship with fighters in hisec and not drones. Both of them will be damage dealer, however, in my mind the range of the carrier ship will have a much longer range + some of...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.05.11 22:58:36
|
7. hi sec carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@Lugh I respect your opinion concerning the necessity for a hisec carrier to fill a specific niche and that fighters on ships should be restricted to low/nullsec, but I just disagree. The light carrier would be a damage dealer as much as any oth...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.05.11 22:37:29
|
8. hi sec carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I accept that there are people that hate the idea of some kind of carrier that can use fighters in hisec for whatever reason - and they are fully entitled to their opinion. However, there are also people that like the idea, otherwise I doubt that ...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.05.11 19:57:59
|
9. hi sec carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Personally, I would like to see some kind of light carrier usable in hisec, but whether that will actually happen is for CCP to decide. In terms of balancing, I think that there are so many variables (both on the ship and the fighters themselves)...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.05.10 20:05:09
|
10. Light carrier - cloaky hunter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@Serendipity Lost & Owen Levanth: Based on the above by scrapping the anti-cloak abilities and adding cloak abilities, it could look something like described below: - Add cloak ability - whether covert or non-covert is up for discussion. If ...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.04.20 17:37:45
|
11. Light carrier - cloaky hunter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@Serendipity Lost - If these are the dynamics you see in nullsec, then a light carrier may not be the answer. If this is the way things are and they are well balanced there may not be a need to change it. However, based on your description the def...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.04.20 16:54:08
|
12. Light carrier - cloaky hunter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thank you for your feedback. As I expected, there are different opinions concerning my idea and that is fine. In my mind cloaked ships should be difficult to find and as such the detection and de-cloaking process should both demand considerable s...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.04.20 11:35:34
|
13. Light carrier - cloaky hunter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thanks for making me aware of that. I was not aware of that thread.
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.04.17 21:55:08
|
14. Light carrier - cloaky hunter - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I have an idea that is based on the recurring idea of a light/escort carrier and many of the well-known arguments for and against light/escort carriers also apply to this idea. I do not know whether a similar idea has been proposed before. In my m...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.04.17 21:49:09
|
15. Announcement:119.2 - Issues (PC) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Visuals for salvagers and tractor beams does not disappear immediately after the modules are deactivated. The visuals remains in place for a while after a wreck has been salvaged.
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2017.02.14 22:24:35
|
16. "Verifying the contents of the shared cache and purging extra f... - in Macintosh [original thread]
I have the same problem and I am running EVE on a PC. There was no problem yesterday and it seems to have come after todays patch.
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2016.05.03 19:57:32
|
17. Announcement:EVE Launcher - Feedback and issues - in EVE Launcher [original thread]
Jarao wrote: Unseen Spectre wrote: I have a question concerning the new launcher. Is it possible to just update the launcher or does the installation of the new launcher require a complete re-install of the full EVE-client? If the latter is...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2016.01.22 14:50:19
|
18. Announcement:EVE Launcher - Feedback and issues - in EVE Launcher [original thread]
I have a question concerning the new launcher. Is it possible to just update the launcher or does the installation of the new launcher require a complete re-install of the full EVE-client? If the latter is the case, I will be hesitant to make the...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2016.01.21 23:16:03
|
19. Filling The Gap - T2 Battleships: The Carrier Escort - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Having seen this thread I think the idea of the Escort carrier is good, but it is also not a new one since it has been proposed several times. I would like to see these ships added, but I guess one of the main issues is the difficulty of defining ...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2015.06.15 20:26:50
|
20. Announcement:Carnyx release - Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
There is a glitch in the Cerberus Graphics when warping. The launcher at the back at the lower side of the ship are are leaving a copy of the launcher in non-warpmode when the launcher is pulled up when the ship is entering Warp. This issue has be...
- by Unseen Spectre - at 2015.06.02 17:44:31
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |