| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
81. Dark Taboo, you have 3 days to respond - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
A more pertinent question would be "did you read the thread?"
- by Xennith - at 2009.12.01 19:48:00
|
82. Tribal Liberation Force corporation caught trading slaves - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Merdaneth If 'coming for their people' is indeed still a primary goal of the UK, then perhaps a small 'thank you' to me would be in order? I am, after all, rescuing their people after being sold slavers (TLF among them). Isn...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.29 16:33:00
|
83. Tribal Liberation Force corporation caught trading slaves - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Jakiin No, I simply expect you to set the involved parties red. Crikey, you think that we set potential allies red on the sayso of Merdaneth and yourselves? You would make a truly awesome alliance diplomat. This thread i...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.29 00:00:00
|
84. Tribal Liberation Force corporation caught trading slaves - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Jakiin I'm disappointed in U'K, actually. I always considered them more moral than most (Even if their morals weren't my own at least they stuck to them) but apparently if a slaver is within the TLF they're given a free pass...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.28 22:39:00
|
85. Tribal Liberation Force corporation caught trading slaves - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
So in your considered opinion, U'K should set the entire TLF to red and embark on a campaign against them based on Merdaneth's say so about the actions of one pod pilot? I do appreciate that we are at the forefront of your mind in the fight agains...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.28 11:53:00
|
86. Tribal Liberation Force corporation caught trading slaves - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Mr Reeth not that I'm accusing anyone. Of course not, your impartiality is a matter of record. Merdaneth seems surprised that a CONCORD organisation with no entry checks or vetting has resulted in some deplorable behav...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.28 01:15:00
|
87. Dark Taboo, you have 3 days to respond - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
I think its a little late to offer that kind of deal. However, next time I manage to take any prisoners, Id be happy to conduct a prisoner exchange with you assuming that a neutral party can be retained to ensure the security of the deal.
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.20 23:09:00
|
88. Dark Taboo, you have 3 days to respond - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Edited by: Xennith on 20/11/2009 18:50:36 Originally by: Merdaneth Originally by: Tagami Wasp Prisoners of War, not slaves. Learn the difference. What is the defining difference between the two then? Prisoners of war ch...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.20 18:49:00
|
89. Dark Taboo, you have 3 days to respond - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Exchanging what are effectively prisoners of war is in no way slavery. If you're really that desperate to attack UK, try using guns.
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.18 22:13:00
|
90. Slaves? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There used to be a mission that did exactly that, if you're interested in the RP, why not pass them over the U'K or Electus Matari?
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.15 12:57:00
|
91. UK, Inquiring minds want to know... - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Jakiin The OP is an idiot. Consensus is reached. We understand your argument, its been rebutted serveral times. Im getting tired of arguing with you to be honest. Our RoE is NRDS with exceptions, if you dont like it th...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.07 00:10:00
|
92. UK, Inquiring minds want to know... - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Kazzzi This has been elaborated before several times. But hey, if they restate the same argument phrased slightly differently again, perhaps this thread will move on?
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.06 23:25:00
|
93. UK, Inquiring minds want to know... - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Inventing a position, ascribing it to your opponent, and then attacking it. Seems pretty applicable here to be honest, if you want to argue semantics, send a convo request to my neocom.
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.05 23:11:00
|
94. UK, Inquiring minds want to know... - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Because the OP was so unbiased? Where are these lies? Where is the doubletalk? Our position is clear and has been for some time, just as the position of our detractors is, slate UK with anything you can think of. Invoke strawman arguments of what...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.05 23:05:00
|
95. UK, Inquiring minds want to know... - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Originally by: Dinaahk Elam [ 2. If UK are going to have space and they claim NRDS, they should allow NRDS in thier home systems, reguardless of how I get there Ill be honest with you. What you think we should do, and what we think we ...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.05 21:26:00
|
96. UK, Inquiring minds want to know... - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
If im reading this thread right, it boils down to 3 arguments. 1: Dhinak: UK are pirates. UK: We kick members for engaging in acts of piracy. 2. Dhinak: UK should force their ROE onto their allies. UK: No, we shouldn't. 3. Dhinak: UK should at...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.05 18:08:00
|
97. Birth Of The Cal-Matari - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Did you codename this thread "operation diplomatic nightmare"?
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.03 22:20:00
|
98. An exclusive glympse into the internal politics of Sylph Alliance - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Welcome to the neighbourhood TF + "CIA". Hope to have a lot of good smack free fights with you guys. I understand the position of Ion Heavy Industries, I dont think that you guys have neccessarily tarred yourselves with the Sylph brush-o-fail for...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.03 20:15:00
|
99. Aegis Miltia Members Dishonour 1vs1 - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
id say that the solution is to expect AM to dishonour the 1v1 and have backup waiting just out of system for when they do. im sure that everyone who has ever dishonoured a 1v1 has a reason or explanation for doing so, getting a kill seems to be a...
- by Xennith - at 2009.11.01 17:41:00
|
100. CVA OFFICIAL STATEMENT - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
good luck guys. hope it gets sorted so that we can kill you properly ;)
- by Xennith - at 2009.10.28 22:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |