| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jasmine Sparrow
   |
Posted - 2004.08.11 04:25:00 -
[1]
 Quote:
Reverting the change from the other day where pirates in missions were changed to only give 50% of the bounty for that type.
Anyone else have a problem with this? what is it CCP? this has happened time and again; you give mission runners something really kewl and then you take it away because of whatever. Why not just give mission runners something kewl and leave it at that? If some people complain, let them vent. You do on most other issues? why do mission runners get the shaft more times than not? Cutting NPC bounties for 'mission runners only' in half is a bad idea and shouldn't be in the main patch imho.
ah... Fujiko
|
Jasmine Sparrow
|
Posted - 2004.08.11 04:25:00 -
[2]
Quote:
Reverting the change from the other day where pirates in missions were changed to only give 50% of the bounty for that type.
Anyone else have a problem with this? what is it CCP? this has happened time and again; you give mission runners something really kewl and then you take it away because of whatever. Why not just give mission runners something kewl and leave it at that? If some people complain, let them vent. You do on most other issues? why do mission runners get the shaft more times than not? Cutting NPC bounties for 'mission runners only' in half is a bad idea and shouldn't be in the main patch imho.
ah... Fujiko
|
Jim Steele
|
Posted - 2004.08.11 09:14:00 -
[3]
it says 'reverting the change' i.e. it never made it to the patch release because it was a bad idea! stop complaining about nothing
Death to the Galante |
Jim Steele
|
Posted - 2004.08.11 09:14:00 -
[4]
it says 'reverting the change' i.e. it never made it to the patch release because it was a bad idea! stop complaining about nothing
Death to the Galante |
Jasmine Sparrow
|
Posted - 2004.08.11 16:18:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Jasmine Sparrow on 11/08/2004 16:24:48
um, no? there was a bigger point than just that one change. Yet all the other efforts to enhance, then nerf, agent missions seem to be of no concern of yours either. Plus just because they take something out of one patch doesn't mean it isn't going to be in the next. So  on you ^.-
ah... Fujiko
|
Jasmine Sparrow
|
Posted - 2004.08.11 16:18:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Jasmine Sparrow on 11/08/2004 16:24:48
um, no? there was a bigger point than just that one change. Yet all the other efforts to enhance, then nerf, agent missions seem to be of no concern of yours either. Plus just because they take something out of one patch doesn't mean it isn't going to be in the next. So on you ^.-
ah... Fujiko
|
Aitrus
|
Posted - 2004.08.11 16:57:00 -
[7]
It has been stated by devs that that change was a miscommunication, and was NEVER meant to be implimented on the test server, let alone TQ.
It was never supposed to happen.
It didn't happen.
It is not going to happen.
Are you clear now?
|
Aitrus
|
Posted - 2004.08.11 16:57:00 -
[8]
It has been stated by devs that that change was a miscommunication, and was NEVER meant to be implimented on the test server, let alone TQ.
It was never supposed to happen.
It didn't happen.
It is not going to happen.
Are you clear now?
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |