| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Darkside 34
Gallente
The Maverick Navy
Southern Cross Alliance
   |
Posted - 2009.02.28 17:05:00 -
[1]
I understand logging of when an enemy force would otherwise not catch you anyway, but the current state of people logging of in buffer tanked haulers/freighters at gates is stupid.
Let me outline a few stupid scenarios, where we are helped out by our best friends who's names wont be mentioned (serious love y'all).
We had just had a fight on gate, the carrier warped to the gate, carrier.....with 15minute aggro.....disconnects and warps to an e-safe. We scan him down, we tackle him, we start killing him. He warps back to station?!?!?!?!?!?!?! WTF? I assume what happened here is when he logged back in his client forced him to continue warping to where he was EVEN though he had a HIC pointing him.
A providence runs one of our camps by logging off, then logging of right after he logs on so he doesn't warp back to the gate. <- DOES THIS NOT SOUND LIKE AN EXPLOIT TO YOU?
And all the time we have buffer tanked haulers logging off right after they jump through gates so they don't have 15min aggro, and if they use the above "trick" its IMPOSSIBLE to catch them.
So, I propose a fix. Once you are agressed (someone is attacking you) then your ship will NOT dissapear until the hostiles STOP aggroing you. Your ship will continue to attempt to warp off to another safe, so if the hostiles have horrible tackle, its their bad luck.
This isn't a "nerf logging off" thread, its a "Fix logging off" and "stop the people from abusing logging off" thread.
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.battleclinic. |
Darkside 34
Gallente
The Maverick Navy
Southern Cross Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.02.28 17:29:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Drake Draconis
sounds like a whole lot of assumptions and a whine post.
And your solution is ridiculous....
Not Supported.
Semi-whine, but I don't see any assumptions.
Propose a better solution, if It sounds good then Ill put it in the OP.
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.battleclinic. |
Darkside 34
Gallente
The Maverick Navy
Southern Cross Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.02.28 18:20:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Drake Draconis
Edited by: Drake Draconis on 28/02/2009 18:15:32
OP: Then come up with a solution that makes sense.
What you currently propose would make interdiction pointless and alot of people would complain of being unable to log out all because of aggro.. never mind the shooting part.
Speaking of which... what happens if they disconnect due to internet access... and then you got a crapton of petitioners asking for there stuff back.
Ok, then how about using the "log off" or "quit game" buttons send a "special" packet to the server causing the logoff to be treated differently. Yes we will have people yanking the cord out of their walls, but at least its more trouble for them. And that means their alts will DC as well.
--------------------------------------------------
http://www.battleclinic. |
| |
|