Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bladen Kerst
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2009.03.09 23:12:00 -
[1]
okay so I know that if I am scanning using core scanner probe for example with 32 au radius and recieve distance at say 10 au, with astrometric pinpointing trained to lvl 5 it would mean that the actual distance could be anything between 2 and 18 au (10 +/- 32/2/2). However what I would like to know if there is a significant difference in probabilities between small deviation and big deviation? or maybe there is no difference at all and it is just plain and simple random number generator where probabilities of any outcome are equal?
|
ollobrains2
Gallente New Eve Order Holdings
|
Posted - 2009.03.09 23:48:00 -
[2]
use 8 probes
|
achoura
|
Posted - 2009.03.09 23:54:00 -
[3]
Use 8 if you enjoy making your own life more difficult, use 1 then place it on the red sphere until you cant reduce further without fully covering it. Now launch 1 and narrow it down to 2 dot at 1/2 au, launch probe number 4 and you have the hit. ***The EVE servers and their patches*** |
Bladen Kerst
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2009.03.10 00:10:00 -
[4]
multiple probes might actually make life easier if there are something like 13 cosmic signatures in a system, but please stay on topic
|
SDragoon
|
Posted - 2009.03.10 00:23:00 -
[5]
Well it seems that the deviation is also based on how good the hit was. If your talking a very low signal (single digits) they yes it may be upwards of 25% of the total range with max skills. However if you have a 50% hit it seems to max out at only 12.5% of the probe range.
So Deviation = [.5*(1-.1*Skill)*(1-Signal Quality)] * Range
OFC, signal quality about doubles when you decrease the range by half, so with your probes at one lower setting will have about 1/4th the deviation.
|
Bladen Kerst
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2009.03.10 15:58:00 -
[6]
Could you link me the source of this formula, or have you worked it out on your own?
|
Bladen Kerst
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2009.03.12 13:01:00 -
[7]
Could someone confirm this formula? A link would be nice.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |