Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 14:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP, please use one method of patching. It is unreasonable and unnecessary to both patch with the launcher, and inside the client itself.
What was wrong with delivering patches in the client and running the repair tool when it doesn't work. |
Garnoo
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 14:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP isnt like other mainstream developers :) People are going to try to ruin your day. Get together with others, ruin their day back - this is EvE |
Jacob Staffuer
State War Academy Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 14:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
INB4 Lock. |
SlapNuts
Massive Dynamic weapons
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 14:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Citrute wrote:CCP, please use one method of patching. It is unreasonable and unnecessary to both patch with the launcher, and inside the client itself.
What was wrong with delivering patches in the client and running the repair tool when it doesn't work.
oh thought this was about missle launchers =P |
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
497
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 15:17:00 -
[5] - Quote
If you don't like the launcher play a game without one.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled **** poast. |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 15:20:00 -
[6] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:If you don't like the launcher play a game without one.
I do |
Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
340
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 15:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
Citrute wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:If you don't like the launcher play a game without one.
I do
Ohhhh ....
-¼.-¼
Thats marvelous! Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco |
Emeos
BLOOM. Bloomswarm
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 15:33:00 -
[8] - Quote
Some people just never are happy |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 15:52:00 -
[9] - Quote
Brujo Loco wrote: Ohhhh ....
-¼.-¼
Thats marvelous!
You're welcome.
If any mods are reading this, feel free to take notes. |
|
CCP Goliath
C C P C C P Alliance
213
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 16:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
Brilliantly there is also an option in the launcher to do what you achieved in your shortcut.
Additionally, we have been publishing manual patch for quite some time now, to give people who are affected by some of the launcher edge cases an alternative way of patching if the repair tool fails.
Finally, it is obviously the goal to have client updates contained within the launcher. It, like all of our features, is developed in iterations and will continue to have its feature set expanded. CCP Goliath | QA Director | @CCP_Goliath |
|
|
Francisco Bizzaro
65
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 16:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
CCP Goliath wrote:Brilliantly there is also an option in the launcher to do what you achieved in your shortcut.
Additionally, we have been publishing manual patch for quite some time now, to give people who are affected by some of the launcher edge cases an alternative way of patching if the repair tool fails.
Finally, it is obviously the goal to have client updates contained within the launcher. It, like all of our features, is developed in iterations and will continue to have its feature set expanded. Unfortunately, my launcher doesn't even get to the point of finding the manual patch before throwing an exception.
A few days ago you were offering patches as .exe files - can you do that again, please? I'm stuck at Wednesday's version. |
|
CCP Goliath
C C P C C P Alliance
213
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 16:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Francisco Bizzaro wrote:CCP Goliath wrote:Brilliantly there is also an option in the launcher to do what you achieved in your shortcut.
Additionally, we have been publishing manual patch for quite some time now, to give people who are affected by some of the launcher edge cases an alternative way of patching if the repair tool fails.
Finally, it is obviously the goal to have client updates contained within the launcher. It, like all of our features, is developed in iterations and will continue to have its feature set expanded. Unfortunately, my launcher doesn't even get to the point of finding the manual patch before throwing an exception. A few days ago you were offering patches as .exe files - can you do that again, please? I'm stuck at Wednesday's version.
The exe files are the manual patches I was talking about, with the Launcher being an autopatcher. Have you tried running the repair tool? CCP Goliath | QA Director | @CCP_Goliath |
|
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
15
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 16:58:00 -
[13] - Quote
CCP Goliath wrote:Brilliantly there is also an option in the launcher to do what you achieved in your shortcut. Are you talking about the big yellow play button?
Not shown is the other shortcut for my ntfs junction. Please educate me on how i can launch multiple clients across separate monitors with different settings using the launcher. Because i dont see it.
CCP Goliath wrote: Additionally, we have been publishing manual patch for quite some time now, to give people who are affected by some of the launcher edge cases an alternative way of patching if the repair tool fails.
Please continue to do so. It is a service that is needed.
CCP Goliath wrote: Finally, it is obviously the goal to have client updates contained within the launcher. It, like all of our features, is developed in iterations and will continue to have its feature set expanded.
When it's feature incomplete or it doesn't work, just say iterate. Because that fixes everything. Honestly, why couldn't this launcher be rolled out when you no longer need to push patches through the client? |
Mathias Hex
Hillcrest Armaments
121
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 23:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
Hmm only problem I had with the launcher is all the links are broken... I recall one night in a nightclub called the matrix, there I was... Mother of god there I am! Holy f**k. |
Francisco Bizzaro
65
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 06:49:00 -
[15] - Quote
CCP Goliath wrote:The exe files are the manual patches I was talking about, with the Launcher being an autopatcher.
Since Wednesday you have been providing patches as ".patch" files in this thread. Where can I get the exe files you are referring to?
Quote:Have you tried running the repair tool? Of course.
When the launcher was first released several weeks ago, I had to open a petition. In it you can find more than three weeks worth of interaction with a GM in which several things were tried, and logs sent. Send me a mail if you're interested in the petition reference.
The end result was the workaround which I suggested on day 1: Supply downloadable patch files which can be applied manually. And that was working very well until Wednesday, when you guys decided to change the procedure again to work through the launcher for some reason.
The particular problem I have is an exception very soon after clicking the launcher: "No connection could be made to the content server. Please make sure that your Internet connection is up and restart the Launcher." I don't know why it is trying to connect to a server when I am trying to install the already downloaded patch, which is in my Eve directory, as per your instructions.
I have opened a new petition three days ago which has been untouched. And there is a perfectly good thread in the Tech forum which is also being ignored. Should we move our conversation to one of those more appropriate venues? |
Zanzil C
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 07:41:00 -
[16] - Quote
I honestly don't see what your problem is with in-launcher patching..... It's convenient, tidy and ...looks nice. |
Francisco Bizzaro
65
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 07:51:00 -
[17] - Quote
Zanzil C wrote:I honestly don't see what your problem is with in-launcher patching..... It's convenient, tidy and ...looks nice. Mostly it's the "not working" part which bothers me (please read thread). But I'm a bit old-fashioned that way. Otherwise, I'm sure I would agree about the convenience and tidiness. |
Pres Crendraven
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 08:05:00 -
[18] - Quote
It start working for me once I disabled my av and my firewall. Old trick, av's are so much more well behaved that nobody mentions it anymore but the patcher modifies a program and hierustics flag that and interrupt the process and the launcher doesn't recover gracefully from interruptions.
Or so it seems to me. Meta34me |
Seleia O'Sinnor
Drop of Honey
212
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 08:08:00 -
[19] - Quote
Can we get an auto start of the game feature in the launcher if nothing has to be patched? Eve community: An angry mob of bright people hunting witches, more torches, more hay forks, growing and growing. |
Cierejai
State Protectorate Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 09:00:00 -
[20] - Quote
Seleia O'Sinnor wrote:Can we get an auto start of the game feature in the launcher if nothing has to be patched?
There already is.
|
|
Francisco Bizzaro
65
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 09:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
Pres Crendraven wrote:It start working for me once I disabled my av and my firewall. Old trick, av's are so much more well behaved that nobody mentions it anymore but the patcher modifies a program and hierustics flag that and interrupt the process and the launcher doesn't recover gracefully from interruptions. In my case, I think the problem is that I connect through a proxy server and don't have any control over its firewall settings. I'm able to do most things - including play Eve - but for instance I can't get torrents, and can't get Eve patches via the automatic downloaders.
I may be unique in having this problem, and don't expect special snowflake treatment. If that problem can't be solved, I'll reluctantly just put this game behind me. I'm really bad at eve anyway, and all that.
But when an easy workaround exists (and it did work for me last Tuesday when they last provided self-applying patches), it seems an unusual move for CCP to turn away a paying customer who's approaching his 5th anniversary in the game.
Anyhow, it's not my usual habit to bring up tech problems in GD. No rant, I don't hate the launcher, I'm sure they did good work on it. I'm just posting here because the thread got some dev attention. |
Missile War
Vita Aequitas Veritas The Paganism Alliance
22
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 09:18:00 -
[22] - Quote
Seleia O'Sinnor wrote:Can we get an auto start of the game feature in the launcher if nothing has to be patched?
It already exists...And it's easy to find in the launcher settings... |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
19
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 18:32:00 -
[23] - Quote
Another patch day, another good laugh. |
Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
97
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 18:59:00 -
[24] - Quote
::notsureifsrsortrolling::
Here's my setup: http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff265/Simulo/EVE_multiclient_ftw.jpg
As for patching once the client's started. Meh, those are like ''hotfixes''. And you should know that some of those client updates ARE NOT NEEDED BY EVERYONE, which is why there's that "Uninstall Client Update" option under Settings.
|
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
19
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 19:10:00 -
[25] - Quote
Much like CCP, I don't think you really read the thread. |
Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
97
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 19:27:00 -
[26] - Quote
Citrute wrote:Much like CCP, I don't think you really read the thread.
I'll assume you're responding to me...
Clarification would be nice if you are speaking about my post. Since I answered all the questions you had:
1) Why client updates aren't applied via the launcher 2) How to avoid using the launcher unless there's an update (this would be a game update like an expansion) 3) How to start multiple clients*
*Settings are saved and accessed globally, it's a pain but you simple start the game and change the settings per client.
|
Xercodo
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Dark Matter Coalition
1058
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 19:31:00 -
[27] - Quote
OH GOD THAT THING IS TINY
oh and TWSS The Drake is a Lie |
Toshiroma McDiesel
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
29
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 19:35:00 -
[28] - Quote
Wait....people still install games to c:/program files(x86)? The Valdspar is Holy, it must be allowed to float free. Free of lesser rocks that try to clutter it's Holy Path though the Heavens. |
Xercodo
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Dark Matter Coalition
1059
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 19:35:00 -
[29] - Quote
Toshiroma McDiesel wrote:Wait....people still install games to c:/program files(x86)?
Yes. The Drake is a Lie |
Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
97
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 19:43:00 -
[30] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:OH GOD THAT THING IS TINY oh and TWSS
...I hate you photobucket.
it's 3600x1080
*punts photobucket's interface*
There we go... http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff265/Simulo/EVE_multiclient_ftw-1.jpg |
|
Xercodo
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Dark Matter Coalition
1059
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 19:51:00 -
[31] - Quote
Thank you. Now, as a clarification for thread readers:
- By checking the first box you can avoid the launcher all times it isn't necessary. - By checking the second box the launcher will get rid of itself once you open EVE like any other launcher should. - By leaving the second box unchecked you can very easily open several clients at once by clicking "PLAY" over and over and then closing the launcher once you have opened the clients you want.
It has already been noted by CCP the potential the launcher has such as being able to login to multiple accounts at once and possibly moving the account login to the launcher itself and having only character select on the client (which would finally mean you could switch character without having to log back in). They are working on it ( '.')-b The Drake is a Lie |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
20
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 20:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
Its quite simple.
If you want to launch multiple clients across multiple monitors, each with their own settings, (my jita trader does not need Bloom shaders and AA) you have to either install multiple copies of the client, and patch each one.
Or
You can use a ntfs junction like any sane person should. If you use a ntfs junction and have both those box'es checked, on patch day when you go to launch your two clients, you WILL destroy your install by having two launchers try to patch the same files.
What i used to do: See there is a patch, close extra clients, click 'okay'. Restart all clients and play eve
What i have to do now See there is a patch, close all clients, run launcher & patch. Close launcher, Open clients, see there is another patch deployed in client. Close all extra clients. Click okay. Install patch, relaunch all clients, play eve. If i missclick on a step or forget to close clients while doing the above, run repair tool and try again.
"They are working on it" is a poor excuse. These sort of things should be developed on the test server, not pushed out as soon as you have a good looking splash screen and 'iterate'. Iteration is needed for those things that were never finished, its a good thing... what we don't need is more crap shoveled to us (that we never asked for) while saying 'it'll get better, i promise!' |
Xercodo
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Dark Matter Coalition
1059
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 20:51:00 -
[33] - Quote
Citrute wrote:Its quite simple.
If you want to launch multiple clients across multiple monitors, each with their own settings, (my jita trader does not need Bloom shaders and AA) you have to either install multiple copies of the client, and patch each one.
Or
You can use a ntfs junction like any sane person should. If you use a ntfs junction and have both those box'es checked, on patch day when you go to launch your two clients, you WILL destroy your install by having two launchers try to patch the same files.
What i used to do: See there is a patch, close extra clients, click 'okay'. Restart all clients and play eve
What i have to do now See there is a patch, close all clients, run launcher & patch. Close launcher, Open clients, see there is another patch deployed in client. Close all extra clients. Click okay. Install patch, relaunch all clients, play eve. If i missclick on a step or forget to close clients while doing the above, run repair tool and try again.
"They are working on it" is a poor excuse. These sort of things should be developed on the test server, not pushed out as soon as you have a good looking splash screen and 'iterate'. Iteration is needed for those things that were never finished, its a good thing... what we don't need is more crap shoveled to us (that we never asked for) while saying 'it'll get better, i promise!'
It was on the test server back in November. Whatever you see now, it was WORSE on SiSi. The Drake is a Lie |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
20
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 20:56:00 -
[34] - Quote
I saw it on the test server, i thought it was a great idea, and even submitted my concerns i felt that needed to be addressed if it were to go live. The fact that it was worse back then is not relevant. It is to be expected that a test server would have issues, and i'm perfectly okay with that. That is what its for, to test and develop. Instead, it seems it was used as a platform to determine what the minimal acceptable feature set they can launch with and while still whispering 'iterate' into our ears.
Whatever happened to 'excellence', or was that scrapped a few years back? |
Xercodo
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Dark Matter Coalition
1059
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 21:05:00 -
[35] - Quote
Citrute wrote: Whatever happened to 'excellence', or was that scrapped a few years back?
It created Incarna cause they got full of themselves.
My point in saying ti was worse as that to show how they DID take some feedback and did make it better and I could only expect that the improvements will take leaps and bounds based on how much better it was between SiSI and TQ. The Drake is a Lie |
Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
98
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 22:01:00 -
[36] - Quote
Citrute wrote:Its quite simple.
If you want to launch multiple clients across multiple monitors, each with their own settings, (my jita trader does not need Bloom shaders and AA) you have to either install multiple copies of the client, and patch each one.
Or
You can use a ntfs junction like any sane person should. If you use a ntfs junction and have both those box'es checked, on patch day when you go to launch your two clients, you WILL destroy your install by having two launchers try to patch the same files.
What i used to do: See there is a patch, close extra clients, click 'okay'. Restart all clients and play eve
What i have to do now See there is a patch, close all clients, run launcher & patch. Close launcher, Open clients, see there is another patch deployed in client. Close all extra clients. Click okay. Install patch, relaunch all clients, play eve. If i missclick on a step or forget to close clients while doing the above, run repair tool and try again.
"They are working on it" is a poor excuse. These sort of things should be developed on the test server, not pushed out as soon as you have a good looking splash screen and 'iterate'. Iteration is needed for those things that were never finished, its a good thing... what we don't need is more crap shoveled to us (that we never asked for) while saying 'it'll get better, i promise!'
Uh-huh, so instead of just using a 'standard' like what's achieved with "Memory" preset you go through the hassle of setting up symbolic links...
So while you go through a Safari Tour to update your clients here's what I do:
1) Launch the Launcher 2) Patch 3) Click 'Play' 4) Install the OPTIONAL Client update(s) 5) Restart game 6) Click 'Play' 5-times 7) Login to each client
I'm perfectly fine with Step 4, because I know that these Client Updates are sometimes only needed by a handful of players that have trouble, but are recommended to those who don't.
I would like to be able to input the Username and Password for my accounts into the launcher so in say a grid-layout or what not I can click "EVE Client 1" and it will login with User: John; Pass: 1234. But "EVE Client 2" will use the User: Smith; Pass: 9876. This goes inline with what I say down below my response to Xercodo.
--
@Xercodo
If you want to run multiple clients it's best to leave the box to close the Launcher unchecked as it will throw an error about not being able to "update a directory from which process are running". So that's something that'll need to be fixed
--
As for placing the settings into the Launcher...no.
How about, instead, a folder with the name of each account as the Folder Name and you simply link EVE Client #1-(whatever) to the corresponding folder.
|
Toshiroma McDiesel
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
29
|
Posted - 2012.04.30 23:40:00 -
[37] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:Toshiroma McDiesel wrote:Wait....people still install games to c:/program files(x86)? Yes.
The reason I asked this is that there have been known issues on many other games that patch on a regular basis running into problems with the game files when they are in any of the Windows Vista and 7 "Program Files" folders. They have special protections that can interfere with patching.
I ran into it when I first got Vista and was playing AO, when I posted in in tech help, first thing they asked was if I had the game in Program Files, if I did... re install it to a separate folder.
The Valdspar is Holy, it must be allowed to float free. Free of lesser rocks that try to clutter it's Holy Path though the Heavens. |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
23
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 00:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
Dyner wrote:I completely missed the point
Its great you use 5 clients on one monitor, I am glad you also needed a wall of text to describe how to patch, instead of a single, simple line like it used to be. I'm happy for you. I really am, its awesome it works for you, but this thread isn't about your non issues with the new launcher.
The launcher also interferes with the ability to take advantage of aero and the way windows handles taskbar grouping. (Look closely, there are two groups there) I cannot achieve this if i start my clients with the launcher. grouping 'by monitor'
I'd really like to have a dialog about this, It's a pity the only dev response's have been to lock the thread or post a smug remark.
Toshiroma McDiesel, that is directly related to UAC, simply turning it off will solve those issues. (or running the application as administrator) |
Hayaishi
Aperture Harmonics K162
105
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 00:36:00 -
[39] - Quote
I run 4 clients,one client is real, the other three are just symbolic links to the original. When it's patch day, I start up one client (as I always do), and it'll patch by the client downloading the patch, closing, then the launcher opens, it patches, then I just close the launcher.
I have four links to my EVE clients, all are the same except they go "installdir/eve1", eve2, eve3 etc etc. and link directly to the eve EXE that runs when the game is running.
All four clients run with different settings, on different monitors, everything.
I suppose you'd nitpick that I still have to apply the client patches on each client on login, yes, you have to do that, but that's just how it works. Other than that, you only run the main patch once. |
Lenore Leelu
Obsidian Dynamics
11
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 00:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
Citrute wrote:Its quite simple.
If you want to launch multiple clients across multiple monitors, each with their own settings, (my jita trader does not need Bloom shaders and AA) you have to either install multiple copies of the client, and patch each one.
Or
You can use a ntfs junction like any sane person should. If you use a ntfs junction and have both those box'es checked, on patch day when you go to launch your two clients, you WILL destroy your install by having two launchers try to patch the same files.
What i used to do: See there is a patch, close extra clients, click 'okay'. Restart all clients and play eve
What i have to do now See there is a patch, close all clients, run launcher & patch. Close launcher, Open clients, see there is another patch deployed in client. Close all extra clients. Click okay. Install patch, relaunch all clients, play eve. If i missclick on a step or forget to close clients while doing the above, run repair tool and try again.
"They are working on it" is a poor excuse. These sort of things should be developed on the test server, not pushed out as soon as you have a good looking splash screen and 'iterate'. Iteration is needed for those things that were never finished, its a good thing... what we don't need is more crap shoveled to us (that we never asked for) while saying 'it'll get better, i promise!'
I do the multiple folders thing. For large patches, after patching one client use the launchers export tool to send the patch data to the next folder. When the launcher is run for your next folder it will pick up the patch you exported. |
|
Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
98
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 01:55:00 -
[41] - Quote
Citrute wrote:Dyner wrote:I completely missed the point
Its great you use 5 clients on one monitor, I am glad you also needed a wall of text to describe how to patch, instead of a single, simple line like it used to be. I'm happy for you. I really am, its awesome it works for you, but this thread isn't about your non issues with the new launcher. The launcher also interferes with the ability to take advantage of aero and the way windows handles taskbar grouping. (Look closely, there are two groups there) I cannot achieve this if i start my clients with the launcher. grouping 'by monitor'I'd really like to have a dialog about this, It's a pity the only dev response's have been to lock the thread or post a smug remark. Toshiroma McDiesel, that is directly related to UAC, simply turning it off will solve those issues. (or running the application as administrator)
Dual monitors...
*I just broke down the simple steps. In short, I patch once and run 5 times, with no need to worry about corruption.
*I start mine via the Launcher and my stuff is grouped: http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff265/Simulo/EVE_multiclient_ftw-1.jpg -From the text and the pic I'm assuming you want the game clients to be grouped?
As for settings the easiest is to set the "default" to say "Performance" preset and then manually change the one client you want to use as your Primary to say "Memory" or "Quality", just make sure to exit that one first so it won't overwrite the "Default" setting you want for the rest of the clients.
...why people over-complicate things, I'll never understand.
-- I would like to see:
1) The "EVE" folder in My Documents moved to "My Documents\My Games\EVE". No, I will not move it myself... -Really irritates me that Game Companies still dump their folders into the " \Documents\ " folder. I know it has to do with the fact that Win2k and the like don't have the "My Games" thing...or some other reason. But it's annoying they can't make it "\Documents\My Games\{Our Game}\" with a simple check to see if "My Games" exist. It's been so long since Win2k and XP that I don't recall if Windows would overwrite a folder with the same name or follow the path (aka auto-merge)
2) With the above I want "\EVE\{Account Name}\" -Inside the {Account Name} I want the settings AND UI Layout (includes Overview stuff) in a nice say XML file that I can copy to the other {Account Name} folders
There's more, in regards to how the client functions, but those are not pursuant to this thread. |
Aargolos
Estrale Frontiers Project Wildfire
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 02:29:00 -
[42] - Quote
I really hate to gripe about stuff, but this launcher is just a PITA.
We've had such a good year of Internet Spaceships and Crucible awesome-sauce...then this clunky launcher comes along.
I applaud CCP and the work they've done but the launcher was totally unnecessary. I now have to patch the launcher and the game.
:sadface:
Looking forward to Inferno though! \o/ |
Mr Stow
Stow Transport and Salvage
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 02:32:00 -
[43] - Quote
This ghodawful launcher has been a brutal experience. Right this moment, I am downloading the game for the 4th time in a week just to get normal access functional. I'm essentially locked out of the game. Some folks may think this nonsense is clever and neccessary, but I'm not impressed. I've got one account. I pay the bill. Launching the game should not require a ceremonial dance, throwing salt over your shoulder, 5 restarts and a prayer to Buddah. Let's get this functional folks. |
Terminal Insanity
The Filthy Ones
619
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 03:19:00 -
[44] - Quote
Launcher would be made infinitely more useful if it managed multiple accounts (preferably one install location, but separate settings for each account, ie; different monitors!)
Good news for you haters, you can just disable the thing (nearly)completely and you only see it while there are major eve patches "War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP |
Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
99
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 16:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
@Mr Stow
-Looks like you're just unlucky.
OS: Win7 [64bit] Install Path: G:\Games\CCP\
No issues at all with the launcher, though I did have an issue where my character went purple ( http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff265/Simulo/wtf.jpg )
How exactly did you setup your game
I would go here: http://community.eveonline.com/download/?fallback=1&
And get the offline installer if you are having issues and forced to reinstall the game. Then just do this for every major release (ie Incarna, Crucible, Inferno).
@Aargolos
The patches you download after launching the game are optional downloads. Unless you're saying you'd rather be forced to use an optional patch that could help most of the playerbase, but totally fucks up your client. In which case, you'd be pretty pissed that the optional update isn't really optional |
Mr Expedite
TransHydro
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 21:12:00 -
[46] - Quote
Oh, I finally got the $%#@& thing working. Apparently it is not meshing well with the STEAM launcher. I completely blew the thing out of STEAM and cut the umbilical. EVE is now running out of it's own discrete directory with this blasted launcher. Honestly, CCP, I luv ya, but I don't need the stress. |
Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpayed Tactical Team
486
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 21:54:00 -
[47] - Quote
Citrute wrote:WHY DO THINGS CHANGE?
El fixed.
|
Dheeradj Nurgle
Misfit Syndicate Warden.
3
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 22:27:00 -
[48] - Quote
Citrute wrote:[quote=Dyner]
Toshiroma McDiesel, that is directly related to UAC, simply turning it off will solve those issues. (or running the application as administrator)
Step by step plan for you;
1. TURN UAC BACK ON 2. Check how many virusses/unwanted or unkown processes you have running. 3. ??? 4. Faster computer, less virusses. |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
24
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 22:28:00 -
[49] - Quote
Meryl SinGarda wrote:Why does windows still ship with a command prompt!? A GUI does everything.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=103148&find=unread
It's amazing how 'doing it the old way' is often the best solution to issues with the new launcher. |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
24
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 22:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
Dheeradj Nurgle wrote: 2. Check how many virusses/unwanted or unkown processes you have running.
0
UAC will not protect you if you click allow/okay.
I sometimes run windows in 'test mode' to run unsigned drivers, too. But thank you for your concern. Computer has been running great since 7 went live. |
|
Dyner
Midgard Protectorate
99
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 06:13:00 -
[51] - Quote
Mr Expedite wrote:Oh, I finally got the $%#@& thing working. Apparently it is not meshing well with the STEAM launcher. I completely blew the thing out of STEAM and cut the umbilical. EVE is now running out of it's own discrete directory with this blasted launcher. Honestly, CCP, I luv ya, but I don't need the stress.
Shouldn't cause any trouble
Then again the Nvidia 285.xx Driver Set cause my home computer to BSoD-loop at Windows Logo, but the comps at work didn't suffer from it.
It's like Russian Roulette....but with software |
Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
638
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 11:54:00 -
[52] - Quote
Citrute wrote:CCP, please use one method of patching. It is unreasonable and unnecessary to both patch with the launcher, and inside the client itself.
What was wrong with delivering patches in the client and running the repair tool when it doesn't work.
Yes this is annoying. I don't want something to patch, launch, patch again, relaunch.
Either use a launcher that does this or do not. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |
Kile Kitmoore
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 14:17:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Citrute wrote:CCP, please use one method of patching. It is unreasonable and unnecessary to both patch with the launcher, and inside the client itself.
What was wrong with delivering patches in the client and running the repair tool when it doesn't work. Yes this is annoying. I don't want something to patch, launch, patch again, relaunch. Either use a launcher that does this or do not.
I really don't have a problem with CCP moving to a Launcher but it just seems a little redundant. Most MMO launchers are used to patch, inform, sell and sometimes login and pick a server. The EVE client already did all this anyway, except of course picking a server.
What I don't like is the, "Can I play yet?" feeling. Patched the other day and here was my experience: 1. Launch EVE, the Launcher does not load but I get an update for it. It shows a status bar, finishes then disappears where I am left wondering if the Launcher is going to start or not. Of course it never loads so I start again. 2. The Launcher is up but there is a patch for the actually EVE client now, ok NP, it's doing it's thing. Shows a status bar at the bottom of the Launcher window and when it's complete the Play button is available, clicked Play. 3. At the actual Login screen now but wait there's more, now I have a window pop-up with another patch. I really can't remember what happen after this, I think it did a quick patch and brought me back into the Login screen of the actual client. Now I can actually login and play!
I understand you guys are trying to get it to a point where the Launcher will do everything (regarding updating of the EVE client software) but honestly the Launcher should have never been released until you had that most basic function in place. Now what you have is a confusing mess, and for what? A launcher that is going to display information that I will see logging in with the actual client?
|
Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
640
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 14:24:00 -
[54] - Quote
Kile Kitmoore wrote:Ciar Meara wrote:Citrute wrote:CCP, please use one method of patching. It is unreasonable and unnecessary to both patch with the launcher, and inside the client itself.
What was wrong with delivering patches in the client and running the repair tool when it doesn't work. Yes this is annoying. I don't want something to patch, launch, patch again, relaunch. Either use a launcher that does this or do not. I really don't have a problem with CCP moving to a Launcher but it just seems a little redundant. Most MMO launchers are used to patch, inform, sell and sometimes login and pick a server. The EVE client already did all this anyway, except of course picking a server. What I don't like is the, "Can I play yet?" feeling. Patched the other day and here was my experience: 1. Launch EVE, the Launcher does not load but I get an update for it. It shows a status bar, finishes then disappears where I am left wondering if the Launcher is going to start or not. Of course it never loads so I start again. 2. The Launcher is up but there is a patch for the actually EVE client now, ok NP, it's doing it's thing. Shows a status bar at the bottom of the Launcher window and when it's complete the Play button is available, clicked Play. 3. At the actual Login screen now but wait there's more, now I have a window pop-up with another patch. I really can't remember what happen after this, I think it did a quick patch and brought me back into the Login screen of the actual client. Now I can actually login and play! I understand you guys are trying to get it to a point where the Launcher will do everything (regarding updating of the EVE client software) but honestly the Launcher should have never been released until you had that most basic function in place. Now what you have is a confusing mess, and for what? A launcher that is going to display information that I will see logging in with the actual client?
Aye exactly I had the exact same experience yesterday. And I just wanted to change a skill *quickly*. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |
Kurai Kihaku
Commonwealth of Individuals
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 14:36:00 -
[55] - Quote
What really pisses me off is that DESPITE the fact that CCP clearly stated that they were introducing the launcher to STOP updating in the game client and streamline updates faster and in a more convenient way, they continue BOTH ways of updating.
So this begs the question then... What was the point of the new launcher? |
Nejjdat
Ma-Ven Industries Phobos Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 16:32:00 -
[56] - Quote
What I'd like is to see a launcher that's resilient to unstable/lossy connections. I actually expected this considering there was a statement about it being Bittorrent-like (if I'm not mistaken; I'm not hardcore enough to read and memorize every post/devblog). I want a launcher that won't say, "Oh, your connection sucks so I'll fail and throw an error at the first packet lost." It makes it a bit difficult to patch for those of us who've been sent to, say, Afghanistan or wherever, places that have shoddy communications infrastructure. |
Testerxnot Sheepherder
DeadHeads - Question Authority Crew
147
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 16:41:00 -
[57] - Quote
Terribad launcher hurr |
Xercodo
Disturbed Friends Of Diazepam Dark Matter Coalition
1065
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:04:00 -
[58] - Quote
Kurai Kihaku wrote:What really pisses me off is that DESPITE the fact that CCP clearly stated that they were introducing the launcher to STOP updating in the game client and streamline updates faster and in a more convenient way, they continue BOTH ways of updating.
So this begs the question then... What was the point of the new launcher?
They were using the launcher to replace the client doing the updating, not the client updates themselves.
The old process used to be: 1-Open client 2-Get patch 3-Open client 4-Get client patch 5-Restart
The new is now: 1-Open launcher 2-Auto update before even opening client 3-Get client patch 4-Restart
The part at step 2 is what changed. Those patches (not the client side ones) are the ones that CCP wanted to stream line cause they are the vital mandatory ones. Those are the patches that contain bug fixes and crash fixes and such and CCP couldn't put them out very often cause they had to do a big compile into a patch file. Now they can deploy individual files and spit out little updates as fast as they can fix things.
The bit at step 3 in the new process with the client updates is being worked on to be added to step 2 so that there is only three steps: 1-Open launcher 2-Auto patch everything 3-Open client
The Drake is a Lie |
Citrute
Quiet.Storm F0RCEFUL ENTRY
28
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 20:28:00 -
[59] - Quote
Confirming terrible launcher is still terrible. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |