| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
TWHC Assistant
39
   |
Posted - 2012.05.01 11:57:00 -
[61] - Quote
Liam Mirren wrote:You might as well forget about using those characters who are/were in those two corps of yours Grimpak, it's pretty obvious.
Seriously, get a girlfriend and stop being a creep. |
Liam Mirren
497
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 13:50:00 -
[62] - Quote
Stop attention whoring with ****** troll threads and I just might.
Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.
My guides: http://mirren.freeforums.org |
Fannie Maes
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 13:52:00 -
[63] - Quote
Ganker making fun of care-bears then asks for more tools because they are the real noob? |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
1507
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 13:55:00 -
[64] - Quote
THE L0CK wrote:concord should be removed. Ganking receives a 1 hour GCC that allows anyone to shoot on sight and -5 sec status makes you remain that way until status is upgraded.
Let us govern ourselves.
*LOL*
That either is a troll, or you simply have no clue what a GREAT idea that is.
In short, it would mean that there's no punishment at all. :D
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Jiska Ensa
Unour Heavy Industries
65
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 14:04:00 -
[65] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:THE L0CK wrote:concord should be removed. Ganking receives a 1 hour GCC that allows anyone to shoot on sight and -5 sec status makes you remain that way until status is upgraded.
Let us govern ourselves. *LOL* That either is a troll, or you simply have no clue what a GREAT idea that is. In short, it would mean that there's no punishment at all. :D
Oh, and you can't dock, jump, or log-out for an hour. And no one can remote-anything you  |
Velicitia
Open Designs
899
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 14:06:00 -
[66] - Quote
Gerald Taric wrote:EVE is not only 100% PvP.
Wrong, sorry.
Gerald Taric wrote:Ganking is not desired in HighSec
Wrong again
Gerald Taric wrote:HighSec = Empire space unter strong control of empire state forces. A state would not get you away with murder and or damage to foreign property.
Wrong yet again (as far as we're concerned -- hisec is under strong control of CONCORD ... not the empire navies so much).
Now, with that said ... the carebears that think they're "leet PvP" because they can dec an industrial corporation in hisec ... well, they're just as bad as the miners who won't go to low/null because of the perceived danger... |
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
309
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 14:10:00 -
[67] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:THE L0CK wrote:concord should be removed. Ganking receives a 1 hour GCC that allows anyone to shoot on sight and -5 sec status makes you remain that way until status is upgraded.
Let us govern ourselves. *LOL* That either is a troll, or you simply have no clue what a GREAT idea that is. In short, it would mean that there's no punishment at all. :D
Actually it was a troll, I forgot to mention that before I went to work yesterday. Just wanted to clarify that as I saw similar request spawn up in new threads.
Edit: It's a pity you couldn't figure out which it was.
Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |
Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
Thundering Herd
658
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 14:11:00 -
[68] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:TrollSuggestion Of The Day:
Delay CONCORD response time by a factor of 3, leaving gankers more time to deal damage, but let CONCORD confiscate/destroy the wreck of the victim as well as that of the ganker's ship. No loot for anyone.
Discuss.
I want more of your oh so lovely  
There isn't anything left for you to do to Carebears. -áGo, kill them some more. They're like fungus or bacteria, they won't die and they won't stop. All you have to show for years of organized harassment campaigns against them is ... nothing. |
Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
Thundering Herd
658
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 14:13:00 -
[69] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:
... well, they're just as bad as the miners who won't go to low/null because of the perceived danger...
Percieved....and EXPERIENCE 100% of the time.
You forgot that part. 
There isn't anything left for you to do to Carebears. -áGo, kill them some more. They're like fungus or bacteria, they won't die and they won't stop. All you have to show for years of organized harassment campaigns against them is ... nothing. |
Grimpak
Midnight Elites
Echelon Rising
437
|
Posted - 2012.05.01 14:23:00 -
[70] - Quote
Liam Mirren wrote:You using another alt now Grimpak?
what the **** is this ****? I never used alts in my 8 and half years of gaming
[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote]
ain't that right |
Gerald Taric
Adamantium Industry
50
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 09:39:00 -
[71] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Gerald Taric wrote:EVE is not only 100% PvP. Wrong, sorry. Mining, trading, researching, refining, ratting, sleeper-ing,collecting, building,scanning, hacking, ... many actions, which might be related to PvP, but are NOT pure PvP.
We could also claim "EVE is 100% economy" because destroying ships let the market florish.
In order to pinpoint it: A player can be actively busy in EVE for weeks without getting involved in any PvP action.
Saying "EVE is 100% PvP" then would mean, this player isn't playing EVE. And stating this in an indirect way leads immediatelly to the lovely question "who defines how to play EVE right?".
Velicitia wrote:Gerald Taric wrote:Ganking is not desired in HighSec Wrong again We are technically allowed to do so, we are allowed to do so by game rules, but CONCORD shooting at Ganker shows, that - seen from "storyline view" - it is not desired (((by CONCORD))).
Concerning the other two statements, i have no noteworthy veto. |
Schalac
Apocalypse Reign
36
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 09:49:00 -
[72] - Quote
You should be barred from all stations that the character you ganked has high standings towards and not allowed to jump through stargates as long as you are GCC. Let's make ganking fun for everyone. |
Xpaulusx
V I R I I
Ineluctable.
42
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 11:13:00 -
[73] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:TrollSuggestion Of The Day:
Delay CONCORD response time by a factor of 3, leaving gankers more time to deal damage, but let CONCORD confiscate/destroy the wreck of the victim as well as that of the ganker's ship. No loot for anyone.
Discuss.
Please don't ever post in the forums again, your brain broken, very sad.  |
Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
Thundering Herd
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 11:14:00 -
[74] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Liam Mirren wrote:You might as well forget about using those characters who are/were in those two corps of yours Grimpak, it's pretty obvious. Seriously, get a girlfriend and stop being a creep.
Look who's talkin'.
"Behold, as a wild ass in the desert, go I forth to my work." - Gurney Halleck |
Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
Thundering Herd
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 11:15:00 -
[75] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:stoicfaux wrote:Only if the player's sec status immediately drops to -10 for willfully committing such a heinous, violent, murderous criminal act in civilized space. Even then there still needs to be some restitution made to the victim. Anything else is simply Welfare PvP. No. If the victim wants restitution then he can get it himself.
Utterly untrue in most cases. Your just an Idiot Troll.
"Behold, as a wild ass in the desert, go I forth to my work." - Gurney Halleck |
TWHC Assistant
45
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 11:43:00 -
[76] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Percieved....and EXPERIENCE 100% of the time.
You forgot that part.
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Look who's talkin'.
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Utterly untrue in most cases. Your just an Idiot Troll.
You seem to have lost your arguments. So I need to ask. Did your mom buy the wrong cereals and now she will not even listen to your emo rages and how unfair this all is? Tell me, I will listen. |
Singulis Pacifica
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 13:28:00 -
[77] - Quote
How about.....no?
Unless players with a sec status of 3.0 or higher can actively shoot at any player with a negative sec. status. (this without CONCORD interference) Gankers vs. Sheriffs. Coming to a system near you. |
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
33
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 13:45:00 -
[78] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:TWHC Assistant wrote:stoicfaux wrote:Only if a ganker's criminal flag lasts until they make restitution to the victim and pay a fine for their actions. Until they do, they're shoot on sight in high-sec in concord systems and by the faction police/sentries that own the space in which the criminal action took place. The current policy of 15 minutes on the most wanted list is pretty insulting for the tough as nails professional gankers.
Drop the flag altogether, but give a sec status penalty together with the confiscation/destruction of the items that are being fought over. Only if the player's sec status immediately drops to -10 for willfully committing such a heinous, violent, murderous criminal act in civilized space. Even then there still needs to be some restitution made to the victim. Anything else is simply Welfare PvP.
Civilized? Eve civilized? Woaw, woaw, woaw, hold the phone. Where in Eve do you live? |
Gerald Taric
Adamantium Industry
50
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 15:44:00 -
[79] - Quote
Sobaan Tali wrote:Civilized? Eve civilized? Woaw, woaw, woaw, hold the phone. Where in Eve do you live? In HighSec  
*sorry could not resist* ;-)
|
stoicfaux
1003
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 16:03:00 -
[80] - Quote
Sobaan Tali wrote:
Civilized? Eve civilized? Woaw, woaw, woaw, hold the phone. Where in Eve do you live?
My bad for not being clear. The NPCs, the ones who "own" high-sec, are civilized. The players, not so much.
And yes, high-sec. Oh, the shame.
You can tell me what is and isn't Truth when you pry the tinfoil from my cold, lifeless head.
|
Piquet Raddei
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:14:00 -
[81] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Piquet Raddei wrote:TWHC Assistant wrote:TrollSuggestion Of The Day:
Delay CONCORD response time by a factor of 3, leaving gankers more time to deal damage, but let CONCORD confiscate/destroy the wreck of the victim as well as that of the ganker's ship. No loot for anyone.
Discuss.
I see yet another player who doesn't have the talent or the balls to go outside the safeties of "high security space" to engage players that can actually shoot back... How's that for a discussion? I sense hate!! This idea needs to be implemented immediately.
Might I suggest injecting the "interpretive reading" skill? You'll need some prereq's first - I suggest "intelligence V" to start...
No hate at all - in fact just boredom. Here's exactly what your post says:
"I want to get away with being a douchebag in high-security space." In fact, furthermore, it says:
"I don't want there to be high security space." Which means in effect you're trying to remove an aspect of the game that has existed since it's creation, as far as I'm aware.
Yeah good luck with that.
Change outta your panties, remove your breast pump (from wherever you have it stuck...) and go out to low-sec/null-sec and shoot sh!t.
"But they might shoot back at wittle me!!"
Yes - they might and probably will...
"But I don't wanna get brone up!"
Then you should visit www.worldofwarcraft.com... |
TWHC Assistant
45
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:19:00 -
[82] - Quote
Piquet Raddei wrote:TWHC Assistant wrote:Piquet Raddei wrote:TWHC Assistant wrote:TrollSuggestion Of The Day:
Delay CONCORD response time by a factor of 3, leaving gankers more time to deal damage, but let CONCORD confiscate/destroy the wreck of the victim as well as that of the ganker's ship. No loot for anyone.
Discuss.
I see yet another player who doesn't have the talent or the balls to go outside the safeties of "high security space" to engage players that can actually shoot back... How's that for a discussion? I sense hate!! This idea needs to be implemented immediately. Might I suggest injecting the "interpretive reading" skill? You'll need some prereq's first - I suggest "intelligence V" to start... No hate at all - in fact just boredom. Here's exactly what your post says: "I want to get away with being a douchebag in high-security space." In fact, furthermore, it says: "I don't want there to be high security space." Which means in effect you're trying to remove an aspect of the game that has existed since it's creation, as far as I'm aware. Yeah good luck with that. Change outta your panties, remove your breast pump (from wherever you have it stuck...) and go out to low-sec/null-sec and shoot sh!t. "But they might shoot back at wittle me!!" Yes - they might and probably will... "But I don't wanna get brone up!" Then you should visit www.worldofwarcraft.com...
And now you are butthurt. How nice. See if I care... |
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
The Irukandji
489
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:32:00 -
[83] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:TrollSuggestion Of The Day:
Delay CONCORD response time by a factor of 3, leaving gankers more time to deal damage, but let CONCORD confiscate/destroy the wreck of the victim as well as that of the ganker's ship. No loot for anyone.
Discuss.
There are a great number of systems where concord doesn't exist, and therefore does not pose a problem. Go on, don't be afraid. No change in game mechanics are required. Oh wait hang on, not sure what your actual argument is: either you and your friends a) cannot do enough dps to kill what you want to kill or b) are afraid of targets that can actually shoot back or fire the first shot. Either way it's you that sucks, not EVE. |
Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor
Federal Consensus Outreach
822
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:36:00 -
[84] - Quote
No, what CCP needs to do is...
... is...
I kind of...
OH **** IT.
WHAT CCP NEEDS TO DO IS MAKE THE GAME ANDREUS IXIRIS ONLINE, OKAY?
AT LEAST I'M HONEST ABOUT IT.
Andreus Anthony LeHane Ixiris
CEO, Mixed Metaphor
Animated Corporate Logos |
Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
549
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:40:00 -
[85] - Quote
no, its stupid |
TWHC Assistant
45
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 17:43:00 -
[86] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:... Either way it's you that sucks, not EVE.
U sure? |
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
The Irukandji
489
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 18:05:00 -
[87] - Quote
TWHC Assistant wrote:Ptraci wrote:... Either way it's you that sucks, not EVE. U sure?
Positive. People seem to have no trouble ganking freighters, jump freighters and Orcas in high sec. Whining for a Concord nerf only means that you don't know how to do it. So learn how to do it. Oh and I love feeding trolls. By all means carry on. |
TWHC Assistant
45
|
Posted - 2012.05.02 18:15:00 -
[88] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Positive. People seem to have no trouble ganking freighters, jump freighters and Orcas in high sec. Whining for a Concord nerf only means that you don't know how to do it. So learn how to do it. Oh and I love feeding trolls. By all means carry on.
Ah, you did not understand my comment!
See, people can continue ganking freighters and whatever they desire. They get more time to do so, too. |
Nephilius
Knights of Athena
Star Council
384
|
Posted - 2012.05.03 00:50:00 -
[89] - Quote
THE L0CK wrote:concord should be removed. Ganking receives a 1 hour GCC that allows anyone to shoot on sight and -5 sec status makes you remain that way until status is upgraded.
Let us govern ourselves.
Never give the inmates the keys to the insane asylum. An idea like this would work for roughly *sudden intake of breath* six minutes. Then the entire game would come crumbling down around your heads.
To call me a Carebear is a misnomer...while it is true that I am hairy like a bear (or two russian women), I really don't care.-á Like, at all.-á Call me an Apathybear.-á Just don't call if you need assistance. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |