| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kayser
   |
Posted - 2004.08.21 15:29:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Kayser on 21/08/2004 15:31:10
Got a question, we had a discussion running today if evading Concord is a bannable Offence or not. Since noone seemed to be absolutely sure if it is or not I'm going to ask here, so:
Is sucessfully evading Concord after killing someone in highsec a bannable offence or not?
|
Kayser
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 15:29:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Kayser on 21/08/2004 15:31:10
Got a question, we had a discussion running today if evading Concord is a bannable Offence or not. Since noone seemed to be absolutely sure if it is or not I'm going to ask here, so:
Is sucessfully evading Concord after killing someone in highsec a bannable offence or not?
|
RUNYOUFOOLS
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 15:37:00 -
[3]
simply put yes, kill someone in high sec space and you gotta go down with the ship.
Everyone crying for a change of rule confesses: I trained the wrong thing, now change the rules because i'm a dumbass.Thats true |
RUNYOUFOOLS
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 15:37:00 -
[4]
simply put yes, kill someone in high sec space and you gotta go down with the ship.
Everyone crying for a change of rule confesses: I trained the wrong thing, now change the rules because i'm a dumbass.Thats true |
Phios Phane
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 15:58:00 -
[5]
running from faction navy's isnt though afaik
---------------------------
The Cold War, EVE style ...
[ 2004.10.17 10:04:18 ] Crystal DeAngelis
> is cos teh vietkong used littel groups and didnt get any lag |
Phios Phane
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 15:58:00 -
[6]
running from faction navy's isnt though afaik
---------------------------
The Cold War, EVE style ...
[ 2004.10.17 10:04:18 ] Crystal DeAngelis
> is cos teh vietkong used littel groups and didnt get any lag |
Nafri
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 16:20:00 -
[7]
dont think so
Wanna fly with me?
|
Nafri
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 16:20:00 -
[8]
dont think so
Wanna fly with me?
|
Pa1nbringr
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 16:39:00 -
[9]
i dont see why you can get in trouble i mean i have never tried since i can't go there, but i dont think i could if i tried lol
----------------------
Fedaykin Naib > eh this is boring, think im going to go choke one out
Pa1nbringr > sick
Fedaykin Naib > lol
|
Pa1nbringr
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 16:39:00 -
[10]
i dont see why you can get in trouble i mean i have never tried since i can't go there, but i dont think i could if i tried lol
----------------------
Fedaykin Naib > eh this is boring, think im going to go choke one out
Pa1nbringr > sick
Fedaykin Naib > lol
|
|
|
Lagar
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 18:08:00 -
[11]
if Evading concord is baneable then CCP need a real rundown that peeps should have a chanse to fully evade a concord....
|
Lagar
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 18:08:00 -
[12]
if Evading concord is baneable then CCP need a real rundown that peeps should have a chanse to fully evade a concord....
|
F'nog
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 22:29:00 -
[13]
I don't think it is unless you do certain things. There was an official post about it awhile ago. If you just run, I think it's OK, but if you have friends help you tank, it's bad, or something like that.
|
F'nog
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 22:29:00 -
[14]
I don't think it is unless you do certain things. There was an official post about it awhile ago. If you just run, I think it's OK, but if you have friends help you tank, it's bad, or something like that.
|
Grosvenor Corama
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 22:41:00 -
[15]
If you have a situation where this happend, the easiest way to get a solid answer would be to ask the GMs by filling a other petition.
~{Forum Rules}~ ♥ ~{contact us}~ |
Grosvenor Corama
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 22:41:00 -
[16]
If you have a situation where this happend, the easiest way to get a solid answer would be to ask the GMs by filling a other petition.
~{Forum Rules}~ ♥ ~{contact us}~ |
Cruz
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 22:52:00 -
[17]
Edited by: Cruz on 21/08/2004 22:54:50
2004.08.21 22:36:00
Victim: JPPaige
Corporation: State War Academy
Destroyed Type: Ibis
Solar System: Kisogo
System Security Level: 1.0
Involved parties:
Name: Cruz (laid the final blow)
Security Status: -0.4
Corporation: Event Horizon Industires
Ship Type: Atron
Weapon Type: Light Electron Blaster I
Destroyed items:
Type: Civilian Gatling Railgun (Fitted - High slot)
Type: Iron Charge S (Cargo)
Quantity: 100
Type: Veldspar (Cargo)
Quantity: 1050
It certainly is possible to gank people while evading concord in empire space 
Just kill them, and run away with MWD on when concord shows up.
And It was just a test, This isnt me bragging about killing an ibis in an atron 
................. |
Cruz
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 22:52:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Cruz on 21/08/2004 22:54:50
2004.08.21 22:36:00
Victim: JPPaige
Corporation: State War Academy
Destroyed Type: Ibis
Solar System: Kisogo
System Security Level: 1.0
Involved parties:
Name: Cruz (laid the final blow)
Security Status: -0.4
Corporation: Event Horizon Industires
Ship Type: Atron
Weapon Type: Light Electron Blaster I
Destroyed items:
Type: Civilian Gatling Railgun (Fitted - High slot)
Type: Iron Charge S (Cargo)
Quantity: 100
Type: Veldspar (Cargo)
Quantity: 1050
It certainly is possible to gank people while evading concord in empire space
Just kill them, and run away with MWD on when concord shows up.
And It was just a test, This isnt me bragging about killing an ibis in an atron
................. |
Wild Rho
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 23:49:00 -
[19]
I think it only applies in 1.0 space which is meant to essentially be 100% safe space, in the others its not an offence to escape but its still damn hard.
It may depend on the method you use to escape (i.e. such as logging out etc).
I have the body of a supermodel. I just can't remember where I left it... |
Wild Rho
|
Posted - 2004.08.21 23:49:00 -
[20]
I think it only applies in 1.0 space which is meant to essentially be 100% safe space, in the others its not an offence to escape but its still damn hard.
It may depend on the method you use to escape (i.e. such as logging out etc).
I have the body of a supermodel. I just can't remember where I left it... |
|
|
Ifni
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 01:17:00 -
[21]
Why should it be banable?
I dont understand whats wrong about it if you are solo since if your repair is greater than CONCORD's damage output then thats bad on CONCORD's part. You are playing by the same rules that you would in another situation.
If you can do it with the aid of other players than it is a fault on the behalf of the game mechanics and should be petitioned. And then the hole should be fixed in a patch.
-
|
Ifni
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 01:17:00 -
[22]
Why should it be banable?
I dont understand whats wrong about it if you are solo since if your repair is greater than CONCORD's damage output then thats bad on CONCORD's part. You are playing by the same rules that you would in another situation.
If you can do it with the aid of other players than it is a fault on the behalf of the game mechanics and should be petitioned. And then the hole should be fixed in a patch.
-
|
Derekian
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 09:34:00 -
[23]
I don't think you can get banned by evading CONCORD....maybe if u just log off and manage to escape this way yes but if u really manage to get the **** out of there then.....Good Job
|
Derekian
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 09:34:00 -
[24]
I don't think you can get banned by evading CONCORD....maybe if u just log off and manage to escape this way yes but if u really manage to get the **** out of there then.....Good Job
|
Rod Blaine
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 10:35:00 -
[25]
In the past managing to evade concord after killing someone in 1.0 was bannable yes. That I am sure of.
Wether or not this is still so, and wether or not it applies in 0.5-0.8 I don't know.
_______________________________________________
Yes yes, blogging is passÚ I know.
Rod's Ramblingz on Eve-Online
Solutions to your issues. |
Rod Blaine
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 10:35:00 -
[26]
In the past managing to evade concord after killing someone in 1.0 was bannable yes. That I am sure of.
Wether or not this is still so, and wether or not it applies in 0.5-0.8 I don't know.
_______________________________________________
Yes yes, blogging is passÚ I know.
Rod's Ramblingz on Eve-Online
Solutions to your issues. |
Smashertron
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 10:41:00 -
[27]
i know someone who could garuntee evading concord 100% sucess rate in 1.0, thought since it was patched and the missle types were changed i dunno
|
Smashertron
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 10:41:00 -
[28]
i know someone who could garuntee evading concord 100% sucess rate in 1.0, thought since it was patched and the missle types were changed i dunno
|
Sleazy Cabbie
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 11:42:00 -
[29]
If you kill someone in lowsec and just MWD away, will concord keep spawning on top of you or how does that work?
At what point do they stop aggroing? Do you just find a safe spot and hang out for 30 minutes?
Thx
|
Sleazy Cabbie
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 11:42:00 -
[30]
If you kill someone in lowsec and just MWD away, will concord keep spawning on top of you or how does that work?
At what point do they stop aggroing? Do you just find a safe spot and hang out for 30 minutes?
Thx
|
|
|
Rocius
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 13:52:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Rocius on 22/08/2004 13:55:08
I dont think safe spots work. As far as I know Concord can use the same tactics we do for finding safe spots with scanners, they are just a helluva lot faster at it.
It should not be bannable if you are using in game tactics to do it, ie not logging off.
Is it even possible to actualy kill a concord ship?
Dont take your gaming too serious ! |
Rocius
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 13:52:00 -
[32]
Edited by: Rocius on 22/08/2004 13:55:08
I dont think safe spots work. As far as I know Concord can use the same tactics we do for finding safe spots with scanners, they are just a helluva lot faster at it.
It should not be bannable if you are using in game tactics to do it, ie not logging off.
Is it even possible to actualy kill a concord ship?
Dont take your gaming too serious ! |
RedClaws
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 14:35:00 -
[33]
yes it is
|
RedClaws
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 14:35:00 -
[34]
yes it is
|
SpiritWulf
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 18:06:00 -
[35]
i have done it ... turn ya puter off fast
-------------------------
WARNING SOME HAS STOLEN YOUR SIGNATURE |
SpiritWulf
|
Posted - 2004.08.22 18:06:00 -
[36]
i have done it ... turn ya puter off fast
-------------------------
WARNING SOME HAS STOLEN YOUR SIGNATURE |
F'nog
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 04:45:00 -
[37]
Edited by: F'nog on 23/08/2004 04:47:42
 Originally by: Ifni
Why should it be banable?
I dont understand whats wrong about it if you are solo since if your repair is greater than CONCORD's damage output then thats bad on CONCORD's part. You are playing by the same rules that you would in another situation.
If you can do it with the aid of other players than it is a fault on the behalf of the game mechanics and should be petitioned. And then the hole should be fixed in a patch.
Why can't some people just accept that a tiny, tiny percentage of the 5300 systems ingame are totally safe? There's what, 20 1.0 systems? You can't use the other 5280 to hunt people? Or do you only like hunting noobs who can't defend themselves from a well-fitted Badger?
|
F'nog
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 04:45:00 -
[38]
Edited by: F'nog on 23/08/2004 04:47:42
Originally by: Ifni
Why should it be banable?
I dont understand whats wrong about it if you are solo since if your repair is greater than CONCORD's damage output then thats bad on CONCORD's part. You are playing by the same rules that you would in another situation.
If you can do it with the aid of other players than it is a fault on the behalf of the game mechanics and should be petitioned. And then the hole should be fixed in a patch.
Why can't some people just accept that a tiny, tiny percentage of the 5300 systems ingame are totally safe? There's what, 20 1.0 systems? You can't use the other 5280 to hunt people? Or do you only like hunting noobs who can't defend themselves from a well-fitted Badger?
|
Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 06:29:00 -
[39]
Originally by: F'nog
Edited by: F'nog on 23/08/2004 04:47:42
Originally by: Ifni
Why should it be banable?
I dont understand whats wrong about it if you are solo since if your repair is greater than CONCORD's damage output then thats bad on CONCORD's part. You are playing by the same rules that you would in another situation.
If you can do it with the aid of other players than it is a fault on the behalf of the game mechanics and should be petitioned. And then the hole should be fixed in a patch.
Why can't some people just accept that a tiny, tiny percentage of the 5300 systems ingame are totally safe? There's what, 20 1.0 systems? You can't use the other 5280 to hunt people? Or do you only like hunting noobs who can't defend themselves from a well-fitted Badger?
its not a question about that  its a question if it is against the rules of the game
let me ask a seperate question though is it even possible 
even in .5 is it possible to kill a player and not get blown to smittherins by concord
Thank You
Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|
Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 06:29:00 -
[40]
Originally by: F'nog
Edited by: F'nog on 23/08/2004 04:47:42
Originally by: Ifni
Why should it be banable?
I dont understand whats wrong about it if you are solo since if your repair is greater than CONCORD's damage output then thats bad on CONCORD's part. You are playing by the same rules that you would in another situation.
If you can do it with the aid of other players than it is a fault on the behalf of the game mechanics and should be petitioned. And then the hole should be fixed in a patch.
Why can't some people just accept that a tiny, tiny percentage of the 5300 systems ingame are totally safe? There's what, 20 1.0 systems? You can't use the other 5280 to hunt people? Or do you only like hunting noobs who can't defend themselves from a well-fitted Badger?
its not a question about that its a question if it is against the rules of the game
let me ask a seperate question though is it even possible
even in .5 is it possible to kill a player and not get blown to smittherins by concord
Thank You
Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|
|
|
Archa
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 07:38:00 -
[41]
Evading concord should not be bannable.
However evading concord after pvp in 1.0 should be bannable.
I get the picture people still don't understand that 0.6 - 1.0 sec space = no pvp space.
People just keep whining about ccp nerfing pvp etc but 0.6 - 1.0 has always been ment safe space. You can pirate away in 0.0 - 0.5 sec space but 0.6 - 1.0 sec space is SAFE space. You can fire a shot at a friendly target but if you do, you are ment to die.
simple.
|
Archa
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 07:38:00 -
[42]
Evading concord should not be bannable.
However evading concord after pvp in 1.0 should be bannable.
I get the picture people still don't understand that 0.6 - 1.0 sec space = no pvp space.
People just keep whining about ccp nerfing pvp etc but 0.6 - 1.0 has always been ment safe space. You can pirate away in 0.0 - 0.5 sec space but 0.6 - 1.0 sec space is SAFE space. You can fire a shot at a friendly target but if you do, you are ment to die.
simple.
|
Sleazy Cabbie
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 08:26:00 -
[43]
I think the concept of "total safety" is a stupid and unrealistic one. You could live next to a police station and still get murdered. You would work in the middle of downtown Manhatten and have a plane fly into your office.
I don't accept total safety just based on principle.
It's hard as hell to kill someone in 1.0, thats fine, but if you can do it, and if you can MWD away, there SHOULD be a way to get away with it, just like OJ.
Just my 2 cents.
|
Sleazy Cabbie
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 08:26:00 -
[44]
I think the concept of "total safety" is a stupid and unrealistic one. You could live next to a police station and still get murdered. You would work in the middle of downtown Manhatten and have a plane fly into your office.
I don't accept total safety just based on principle.
It's hard as hell to kill someone in 1.0, thats fine, but if you can do it, and if you can MWD away, there SHOULD be a way to get away with it, just like OJ.
Just my 2 cents.
|
Shenrogar
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 15:47:00 -
[45]
banable, i dont think it would be, possible sure why the hell not
|
Shenrogar
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 15:47:00 -
[46]
banable, i dont think it would be, possible sure why the hell not
|
ActiveX
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 16:25:00 -
[47]
Unless you hacked the server to do it, it shouldnt be bannable.
Succeeding where you are designed to fail is not something you should be punished for.
____________
Sex / Rank 9 / SP: 1280 of 2304000 
|
ActiveX
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 16:25:00 -
[48]
Unless you hacked the server to do it, it shouldnt be bannable.
Succeeding where you are designed to fail is not something you should be punished for.
____________
Sex / Rank 9 / SP: 1280 of 2304000
|
Sassinak
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 16:42:00 -
[49]
Originally by: RUNYOUFOOLS
simply put yes, kill someone in high sec space and you gotta go down with the ship.
hey, its only a crime if ya get cought 
Sass
Arcane Technologies |
Sassinak
|
Posted - 2004.08.23 16:42:00 -
[50]
Originally by: RUNYOUFOOLS
simply put yes, kill someone in high sec space and you gotta go down with the ship.
hey, its only a crime if ya get cought
Sass
Arcane Technologies |
|
|
Hanse Davion
|
Posted - 2004.08.25 14:39:00 -
[51]
AFAIK you all got it wrong. Way I remember it was that there used to be a bug that allowed it. If you have -10+, key emphasis on OVER -10 then Concord would ignore you. That was patched when some of the old pirates went on a killing spree in newbie systems.
Other then that I have seen no rules stating that evading Concord is bannable. I wish a GM would post here about this, if they got time to read and lock threads they should make time to answer game rule questions.
As for there being anyplace that is 100% safe, that is a joke. There is no place in Eve that is 100% safe for anyone. It's a matter of how much you are willing to lose to pod someone. It can be done in a 1.0, you MAY not get out with your ship intact, but you will get out. Remember Concord DOESN'T pod.
2005.01.21 05:09:06combatYour Tachyon Beam Laser I perfectly strikes Blood Priest, wrecking for 533.1 damage. |
Hanse Davion
|
Posted - 2004.08.25 14:39:00 -
[52]
AFAIK you all got it wrong. Way I remember it was that there used to be a bug that allowed it. If you have -10+, key emphasis on OVER -10 then Concord would ignore you. That was patched when some of the old pirates went on a killing spree in newbie systems.
Other then that I have seen no rules stating that evading Concord is bannable. I wish a GM would post here about this, if they got time to read and lock threads they should make time to answer game rule questions.
As for there being anyplace that is 100% safe, that is a joke. There is no place in Eve that is 100% safe for anyone. It's a matter of how much you are willing to lose to pod someone. It can be done in a 1.0, you MAY not get out with your ship intact, but you will get out. Remember Concord DOESN'T pod.
2005.01.21 05:09:06combatYour Tachyon Beam Laser I perfectly strikes Blood Priest, wrecking for 533.1 damage. |
Ripp Tyde
|
Posted - 2004.08.25 22:12:00 -
[53]
No space is safe space. just as there is no safe space in the world as we know it. Example: You are in a secure federal prison(dont get much safer than that). Standing in the lunch line a inmate walks by and stabs u, puncturing ur kidney. there is 10 gaurds watching this happen.
now back to the topic.
No matter what sec space ur in, running from concord should by no means be a banable offense.
1 they come in uneven odds when responding to the offense.
2 why is it ur fault u were smarter than the policing entity.
3 if they wanted a for sure kill why didnt ccp make it so ur ship blew up on an offense. instead they make a policing force.
4 this is a game of team work. no matter who it is u face(player or npc) u have the right to fight as a team. just means ur team mates will also be on the run from concord.
There are so many questions concerning what is OK and what is not. beit moral or regulated. The problem is we as the player do not really have the official Do's & Don'ts. Yes i can parce thru thousands of threads to hopefully find a resonable answer to a question such as this. Either give us the Do's & Don'ts or answer our questions!
Ripp Tyde
F.R.E.E.E.
DingleBerry Bear
|
Ripp Tyde
|
Posted - 2004.08.25 22:12:00 -
[54]
No space is safe space. just as there is no safe space in the world as we know it. Example: You are in a secure federal prison(dont get much safer than that). Standing in the lunch line a inmate walks by and stabs u, puncturing ur kidney. there is 10 gaurds watching this happen.
now back to the topic.
No matter what sec space ur in, running from concord should by no means be a banable offense.
1 they come in uneven odds when responding to the offense.
2 why is it ur fault u were smarter than the policing entity.
3 if they wanted a for sure kill why didnt ccp make it so ur ship blew up on an offense. instead they make a policing force.
4 this is a game of team work. no matter who it is u face(player or npc) u have the right to fight as a team. just means ur team mates will also be on the run from concord.
There are so many questions concerning what is OK and what is not. beit moral or regulated. The problem is we as the player do not really have the official Do's & Don'ts. Yes i can parce thru thousands of threads to hopefully find a resonable answer to a question such as this. Either give us the Do's & Don'ts or answer our questions!
Ripp Tyde
F.R.E.E.E.
DingleBerry Bear
|
Mon Palae
|
Posted - 2004.08.25 23:06:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Archa
Evading concord should not be bannable.
However evading concord after pvp in 1.0 should be bannable.
I get the picture people still don't understand that 0.6 - 1.0 sec space = no pvp space.
People just keep whining about ccp nerfing pvp etc but 0.6 - 1.0 has always been ment safe space. You can pirate away in 0.0 - 0.5 sec space but 0.6 - 1.0 sec space is SAFE space. You can fire a shot at a friendly target but if you do, you are ment to die.
simple.
I am not sure about the difference in your first two sentences.
Remember the thread is asking what the rules ARE. Not what everyone thinks they should be.
My only question is if evading CONCORD is actually a bannable offense then why bother expending server resources generating ships to go chase the offender. If he MUST die why not just make him blow up on the spot? Mind you I am not advocating that but that is what it amounts to and seems silly to me.
The real problem I think with evading CONCORD is that while they are Uber NPCs they are still NPCs and as such clever people will find a way to avoid them (people have already shown how in this thread). If that is the case then you WILL see noob gankers in 1.0. So that gets you back to it being a sploit to evade CONCORD.
Perhaps you can see the dilemma. It is silly to say CONCORD must not be evaded and the alternative is unrestrained noob ganking. Not very good choices for CCP.
|
Mon Palae
|
Posted - 2004.08.25 23:06:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Archa
Evading concord should not be bannable.
However evading concord after pvp in 1.0 should be bannable.
I get the picture people still don't understand that 0.6 - 1.0 sec space = no pvp space.
People just keep whining about ccp nerfing pvp etc but 0.6 - 1.0 has always been ment safe space. You can pirate away in 0.0 - 0.5 sec space but 0.6 - 1.0 sec space is SAFE space. You can fire a shot at a friendly target but if you do, you are ment to die.
simple.
I am not sure about the difference in your first two sentences.
Remember the thread is asking what the rules ARE. Not what everyone thinks they should be.
My only question is if evading CONCORD is actually a bannable offense then why bother expending server resources generating ships to go chase the offender. If he MUST die why not just make him blow up on the spot? Mind you I am not advocating that but that is what it amounts to and seems silly to me.
The real problem I think with evading CONCORD is that while they are Uber NPCs they are still NPCs and as such clever people will find a way to avoid them (people have already shown how in this thread). If that is the case then you WILL see noob gankers in 1.0. So that gets you back to it being a sploit to evade CONCORD.
Perhaps you can see the dilemma. It is silly to say CONCORD must not be evaded and the alternative is unrestrained noob ganking. Not very good choices for CCP.
|
Kynoch
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 18:01:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Cruz
Edited by: Cruz on 21/08/2004 22:54:50
2004.08.21 22:36:00
Victim: JPPaige
Corporation: State War Academy
Destroyed Type: Ibis
Solar System: Kisogo
System Security Level: 1.0
Involved parties:
Name: Cruz (laid the final blow)
Security Status: -0.4
Corporation: Event Horizon Industires
Ship Type: Atron
Weapon Type: Light Electron Blaster I
Destroyed items:
Type: Civilian Gatling Railgun (Fitted - High slot)
Type: Iron Charge S (Cargo)
Quantity: 100
Type: Veldspar (Cargo)
Quantity: 1050
It certainly is possible to gank people while evading concord in empire space
Just kill them, and run away with MWD on when concord shows up.
And It was just a test, This isnt me bragging about killing an ibis in an atron
WTF? You killed and ultra-noob that still had on his civy gun and in an Ibis no less? Is that fun for you Crud(Z)?
Please come to Period Basis or camp A2 FFS so you can at least do real PVP not some lamer stuff like that.
|
Kynoch
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 18:01:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Cruz
Edited by: Cruz on 21/08/2004 22:54:50
2004.08.21 22:36:00
Victim: JPPaige
Corporation: State War Academy
Destroyed Type: Ibis
Solar System: Kisogo
System Security Level: 1.0
Involved parties:
Name: Cruz (laid the final blow)
Security Status: -0.4
Corporation: Event Horizon Industires
Ship Type: Atron
Weapon Type: Light Electron Blaster I
Destroyed items:
Type: Civilian Gatling Railgun (Fitted - High slot)
Type: Iron Charge S (Cargo)
Quantity: 100
Type: Veldspar (Cargo)
Quantity: 1050
It certainly is possible to gank people while evading concord in empire space
Just kill them, and run away with MWD on when concord shows up.
And It was just a test, This isnt me bragging about killing an ibis in an atron
WTF? You killed and ultra-noob that still had on his civy gun and in an Ibis no less? Is that fun for you Crud(Z)?
Please come to Period Basis or camp A2 FFS so you can at least do real PVP not some lamer stuff like that.
|
Corvus Dove
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 18:24:00 -
[59]
IMHO:
Bannable or not, it shouldn't be unless an exploit was used to do it.
Ganking a n00b in high-sec space is on par with a mugger running past a soup kitchen to beat a child to a pulp and steal his jawbreaker. In front of a police station.
If you take the time, effort, and absolute lack of monetary sense to do such a thing, and you pull it off, you deserve to get away with your lameness. |
Corvus Dove
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 18:24:00 -
[60]
IMHO:
Bannable or not, it shouldn't be unless an exploit was used to do it.
Ganking a n00b in high-sec space is on par with a mugger running past a soup kitchen to beat a child to a pulp and steal his jawbreaker. In front of a police station.
If you take the time, effort, and absolute lack of monetary sense to do such a thing, and you pull it off, you deserve to get away with your lameness. |
|
|
Marcus Janus
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 19:03:00 -
[61]
To who ever said totally safe isn't like real life neither is flying around in space shooting lasers at each other
|
Marcus Janus
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 19:03:00 -
[62]
To who ever said totally safe isn't like real life neither is flying around in space shooting lasers at each other
|
Shootemup
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 12:24:00 -
[63]
If there should be a rule written in stone that "Thou shall xplode if podding in 1.0 space", just trigger a uninterruptible self-destruct. *shrug*
If you can get away from CONCORD, then the makers of the game are letting you get away from CONCORD.
|
Shootemup
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 12:24:00 -
[64]
If there should be a rule written in stone that "Thou shall xplode if podding in 1.0 space", just trigger a uninterruptible self-destruct. *shrug*
If you can get away from CONCORD, then the makers of the game are letting you get away from CONCORD.
|
Voltex
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 12:32:00 -
[65]
Sometimes i think CCP can mix the game with real life, banning peoples accounts for killing someone in 1.0 and evading concord, thats why they have concrd - to stop ppl from doing that, if concord can't do there job then tough s**t.
'Your 250mm Carbide completely misses Guristas Annihilator, Doing 0 damage'
|
Voltex
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 12:32:00 -
[66]
Sometimes i think CCP can mix the game with real life, banning peoples accounts for killing someone in 1.0 and evading concord, thats why they have concrd - to stop ppl from doing that, if concord can't do there job then tough s**t.
'Your 250mm Carbide completely misses Guristas Annihilator, Doing 0 damage'
|
Terrifiedkiller
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 18:21:00 -
[67]
Edited by: Terrifiedkiller on 27/08/2004 18:24:01
what they should do is make it possible to evade concord with warp core stabalizers and every time you escape from them you get a big sec hit and if you get below -1.0 sec status or below and you dont have a bounty have concord put a bounty on you and if you have a bounty already they should raise the bounty. heck if npc rats you find in agent kill missions can do it we should be able to do it too. and they shouldnt allow this in newbie sectors either to protect the newbies
|
Terrifiedkiller
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 18:21:00 -
[68]
Edited by: Terrifiedkiller on 27/08/2004 18:24:01
what they should do is make it possible to evade concord with warp core stabalizers and every time you escape from them you get a big sec hit and if you get below -1.0 sec status or below and you dont have a bounty have concord put a bounty on you and if you have a bounty already they should raise the bounty. heck if npc rats you find in agent kill missions can do it we should be able to do it too. and they shouldnt allow this in newbie sectors either to protect the newbies
|
Corvus Dove
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 18:38:00 -
[69]
Now that leads to a very workable and sensible suggestion.
A sec hit every time you incite the wrath of Concorde. You get one anyway, for initiating the attack, so basically you'd be increasing the overall sec hit.
Since Podding does ungodly sec damage anyway, you could concievably get a total of -1.0 between your aggression and the Concord response, and then another -1.5 for the podding.
Total of -2.5, which then limits the attacker to 0.7 and below. It happens again, and they're limited to .4 and below, where they belong.
"You Griefer!!!" = "You Doodyhead!!!" |
Corvus Dove
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 18:38:00 -
[70]
Now that leads to a very workable and sensible suggestion.
A sec hit every time you incite the wrath of Concorde. You get one anyway, for initiating the attack, so basically you'd be increasing the overall sec hit.
Since Podding does ungodly sec damage anyway, you could concievably get a total of -1.0 between your aggression and the Concord response, and then another -1.5 for the podding.
Total of -2.5, which then limits the attacker to 0.7 and below. It happens again, and they're limited to .4 and below, where they belong.
"You Griefer!!!" = "You Doodyhead!!!" |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |