| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DeODokktor
Dark Templars
The Fonz Presidium
   |
Posted - 2009.04.22 08:53:00 -
[1]
Unlock .4 for POS's..
Right now POS's in .4 have highsec retrictions but they are in lowsec.
Give us the ability to React, Moon Mine, Build from LSAA's, and any other lowsec benefit there is.
There's no benefit to having a POS in .4, If your going to pay the extra for charters then you'll just move to a .5, If your willing to be in a .4 then you'll just move to a .3< ...
Unlock 0.4!
-----------
Never Forget |
Asa Kusa
The Ninth Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 09:13:00 -
[2]
signed
|
Dracus Algor
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 09:16:00 -
[3]
I completely agree |
StargateC0mmand
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 09:22:00 -
[4]
signed |
DeODokktor
Dark Templars
The Fonz Presidium
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 13:03:00 -
[5]
hmm, few post went missing there :/ |
DeODokktor
Dark Templars
The Fonz Presidium
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 13:05:00 -
[6]
If you support this then say something like "I support this" instead of signed.. else the ever-viligant mods will delete the post..
If it was a combat related post I am sure signed would be valid ;P. |
Cypher Davkas
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 13:06:00 -
[7]
I'd agree with this. .4 is considered lowsec in everything but anchoring POS's. Time to clear up that line. I don't understand the logic to requiring charters in .4 nor the ability to moon mine or react.
Please Unlock .4 POS's CCP |
DArci Chang
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 14:50:00 -
[8]
I agree, current restrictions are flawed, lets have them fixed. |
Captain Dorja
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 16:51:00 -
[9]
You are absolutly right. That seems like a pointless arbitrary restriction which should be removed. |
Arboril Vanacaris
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 20:31:00 -
[10]
I support this idea. The greatly increasing number of eve players has to be making T2 more in-demand than ever.
|
Meatball Enema
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 20:32:00 -
[11]
It makes no sense why it would not be unlocked.
|
Tatami Dolphin
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 20:59:00 -
[12]
I head sec status can fractuate. Say your pos is in 0.499, what would happen if sec increased a bit and across the threshold. That is probaly why.
If this kind of rare event happnes, all moon harvesters shut down? Maybe that could be the way.
|
DeODokktor
Dark Templars
The Fonz Presidium
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 21:14:00 -
[13]
 Originally by: Tatami Dolphin
I head sec status can fractuate. Say your pos is in 0.499, what would happen if sec increased a bit and across the threshold. That is probaly why.
If this kind of rare event happnes, all moon harvesters shut down? Maybe that could be the way.
I know they have changed the way Sec Status works a few times, never heard of it moving except in a few instances where they removed nullsec type of systems from empire, and highsec systems from nullsec areas. Those were manual edits however.
Your close to the reason why I was told that pos's could not use .4 systems. the reason I was told was that the POS would check the secstatus and allow .4 rules in any .4, including .455+ systems ... so those systems would be treated as .5 by concord and agression rules, yet you could anchor a pos according to .4 rules.
If it was true, then it means they just didnt want to program in those extra few decimal checks, or, allow the pos to check the grade of the system instead of part of a stored value. In other words, limiting pos's in .4 was a quick way of getting around the problem..
There were a few mods (moon harvs, reactors, and a few other modules that said they could be anchor'd in .4, devs confirmed the idea was that .4 shouldnt require charters and items should work in .4... After checking they changed the wording and said that it looks like it will only be for less than .4 systems, and as such, my complaining had the moon harv and other arrays changed to "Restricted to Security level Less than" in the attribute tabs. In other words, instead of fixing it they just edited the attribute to go along with it ;P....
So I want to push this until either a dev (one who can give a rough idea as to why .4 is locked other than saying "I can see it is coded to lock you out") explains why it's this way, or they admit it should be different and change it.
-----------
Never Forget |
Cain m
Minmatar
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 22:11:00 -
[14]
/me wants to assign fighters in 0.4
|
Sig Sour
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 23:19:00 -
[15]
In short, I support this.
Call it a hunch, but I think they probably will, for moon mining as well. Given that there is a larger demand T2 (more players) and the moons are just as static as when they started, I think they put a buffer in for when the straw breaks the camels back. I believe when there are more complaints about class separation in the economy and imbalance in moons, they will make these changes.
|
Lilla Kharn
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 05:01:00 -
[16]
Aren't you able to not assign fighters in 0.4 as well?
I support this.
-------------------------------
"Only the dead have seen the end of war" - Plato |
Darth Sith
Genbuku.
Daisho Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 14:24:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Lilla Kharn
Aren't you able to not assign fighters in 0.4 as well?
I support this.
Nope .. no worky :(
|
Dirk Magnum
Royal Hiigaran Navy
SCUM.
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 15:33:00 -
[18]
Require charters in low sec systems of any sec level 0.1 to 0.4 if that system is adjacent to high sec. Remove charter restrictions in all other low sec systems.
|
Erovicious
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 17:24:00 -
[19]
Supported, and a long overdue and beyond common sense change.
*Ero*
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |