| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Agent Known
Apotheosis of Virtue
   |
Posted - 2009.05.07 02:06:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Agent Known on 07/05/2009 02:06:29
I see a discussion going on in GD with mixed results, so might as well give it a try here.
We all know about the corporation wallet divisions to seperate the ISK into various categories to make it easier to track. Why not allow this for personal wallets as well? Of course, to prevent it from using too many server resources, there would likely be only one or two additional divisions.
The reasoning behind it (Pros):
1) Makes managing income/expenses so much easier
2) Would fit easily into EVE: Why in this day and age are we restricted to one account when the average person has more than that?
3) Reduces the likelihood of overspending; how many of you have accidentially spent too much money when you were saving for that shiny ship/module/skillbook/whatever that you wanted?
Possible cons:
1) Nerfs scamming by making it more difficult to get people to spend lots of money on a contract
2) Increased server lag (?)
Now, I know a lot of people will jump on the fact that it will nerf scamming, but really, how many people will micromanage their money ALL the time? I personally would like it to keep track of how much I make doing whatever (missioning, mining), and it would help corps by allowing them to seperate and distribute income from selling minerals on a mining op (thus eliminating the pen-and-paper aspect).
Thoughts? If you're against it, please say WHY so it can be put up for discussion.
|
Quacka
Cogito Facio Fio
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 02:15:00 -
[2]
I think this is sometihng that has been brought up several times and I think CCP has said that its a possibility. In any case... /signed.
|
Agent Known
Apotheosis of Virtue
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 02:20:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Quacka
I think this is sometihng that has been brought up several times and I think CCP has said that its a possibility. In any case... /signed.
I guess I should use search more often. I end up posting things as I think of them before they run away with my other thoughts...it's happened before. Wait, what was I thinking about?!?
Oh, right...supporting my own topic.
|
Iveran
Banteki
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 03:31:00 -
[4]
Scam protection a nerf?... na, screw a scammer,
_______
|
Rakshasa Taisab
Sane Industries Inc.
United Freemen Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 04:08:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Rakshasa Taisab on 07/05/2009 04:08:35
Want.
|
Nishino Beermaiden
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 04:40:00 -
[6]
Do want.
|
Lucas Avidius
Einherjar Rising
Cry Havoc.
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 06:09:00 -
[7]
This idea is a keeper.
|
DragonWarp
Forsaken Forerunners
Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 10:31:00 -
[8]
I agree!
~Dragon |
darius mclever
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 12:37:00 -
[9]
|
Tesseract d'Urberville
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 14:01:00 -
[10]
I could have sworn that this was raised earlier, but I don't see it listed on the CSM wiki.
Nevertheless, supported!
---------------------------------
Thomas Hardy is going to eat your brains. |
|
|
Lee Dalton
THE FINAL STAND
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 14:06:00 -
[11]
Would be useful.
***
You're only as good as your last fight. |
LaVista Vista
Conservative Shenanigans Party
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 14:06:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Tesseract d'Urberville
I could have sworn that this was raised earlier, but I don't see it listed on the CSM wiki.
Nevertheless, supported!
I could have sworn that too!
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 15:32:00 -
[13]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Tesseract d'Urberville
I could have sworn that this was raised earlier, but I don't see it listed on the CSM wiki.
Nevertheless, supported!
I could have sworn that too!
Same.
|
De'Veldrin
Special Projects Executive
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 16:58:00 -
[14]
Raised before, raised now - whatever. My answer remains the same.
Yes, please and thank you.
As for nerfing scamming - not really. If they're successful scammers, this really won't hurt them, and if they're not - well, they should be thinking of another line of work anyway.
--Vel
Experience is what you get right after you need it. |
Shadow Conjoiner
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 17:49:00 -
[15]
/signed
|
Agent Known
Apotheosis of Virtue
|
Posted - 2009.05.09 17:26:00 -
[16]
Bumping an important thread.
Also, anyone have links to previous proposals where this was brought up? It'd be interesting to see how many people want this. 
|
Kaldoreign
CNexus
|
Posted - 2009.05.09 20:51:00 -
[17]
Absolutely.
|
Topkapi
|
Posted - 2009.05.09 21:08:00 -
[18]
this would be very very nice
|
Treelox
Seppuku Warriors
|
Posted - 2009.05.10 01:43:00 -
[19]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
Originally by: Tesseract d'Urberville
I could have sworn that this was raised earlier, but I don't see it listed on the CSM wiki.
Nevertheless, supported!
I could have sworn that too!
Oh i know I have voted on this very subject before.
--
|
Thresh Avery
Best Path Inc.
Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2009.05.10 03:28:00 -
[20]
I've been thinking the same thing for quite a while - a method of "banking" your isk. 
This seems like a simple and easy method to implement. Nice idea!
|
|
|
Emrys Ap'Morgravaine
Caercamel Corporate Interdictions
|
Posted - 2009.05.13 13:52:00 -
[21]
Definetely useful, especially if you can designate certain wallet divisions for certain tasks (such as seperate areas for buy/sell orders)
Supported
Em.
-=-=-=-=-
Reformed Carebear.
Much bear, zero care.
-=-=-=-=- |
Ta'jek
Angels Of Death EVE
Free Worlds Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.13 15:40:00 -
[22]
I am all for it since I do the trading for my corp and often given ISK to pick up items for individuals when out and about... makes it easier to track that way
|
Karina Redstar
|
Posted - 2009.05.15 10:55:00 -
[23]
|
Betonela
|
Posted - 2009.05.15 10:55:00 -
[24]
|
Phoenix493
Orion Faction
|
Posted - 2009.05.15 11:34:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Phoenix493 on 15/05/2009 11:39:17
I raised this idea about 8 months ago and Lavista Was on the case..never did hear anything back..Time to try again?
Linky to Original Topic (now closed cos it's so old!)
|
Zostera
Honour Bound
Sc0rched Earth
|
Posted - 2009.05.15 11:51:00 -
[26]
Supported.
Even adding one additional division for "Savings" would be useful. This may help to avoid expense scams by limiting the amount of isk you have in your "Current account", and requiring you to move cash before a large transaction. The extra pause for thought while you transfer cash may just be enough time for the "somethings wrong" light to start blinking.
Zos
Vote Mazzilliu 09 CSM |
Kralin Ignatov
Mentis Fidelis
Avarice.
|
Posted - 2009.05.15 13:38:00 -
[27]
nice
|
Voculus
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.05.15 15:42:00 -
[28]
_________________________________________________________
Give me three turrets on the Naglfar, or give me death! |
Foolish Bob
The Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
|
Posted - 2009.05.16 09:41:00 -
[29]
I see no downside to this (other than the work required to implement it - sorry CCP  )
/signed
|
Holy Lowlander
|
Posted - 2009.05.16 12:59:00 -
[30]
yes definatly
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |