it's so you can't get OMG UBER stats from stacking invul/other hardeners on top of each other. SEriously, you'd get 90-100% (EM :P ) resists FAR too easily with 4 Invuls if you trashed the stacking penalty

Your first fail was drawing a comparison with real life.

Your second fail was not noticing that the stacking penalties actually provide a kind of in-built 'balancer' to the game.

And your third fail is actually a kind of success, as I have just noticed your corp name. Congratulations!

So i can't get two separate computers work on same aircraft at their full capacity because of? Because you know two separate computers work at their full capacity on aircrafts and also everywhere else without any "stacking penalty". This thing is too far beyond logic and breaks immersion heavily.

It won't be going anywhere without a significant overhaul of the entire game.

Just as an example, an Apocalypse Navy Issue has 8 low slots. Fill them up with Imperial Navy Heat Sink modules. You now have +100% damage if there's no stacking penalty. That's why the stacking penalty exists. Damage and resists would be off the wall without the penalty.

So i can't get two separate computers work on same aircraft at their full capacity because of? Because you know two separate computers work at their full capacity on aircrafts and also everywhere else without any "stacking penalty". This thing is too far beyond logic and breaks immersion heavily.

It won't be going anywhere without a significant overhaul of the entire game.

Just as an example, an Apocalypse Navy Issue has 8 low slots. Fill them up with Imperial Navy Heat Sink modules. You now have +100% damage if there's no stacking penalty. That's why the stacking penalty exists. Damage and resists would be off the wall without the penalty.

This thing is too far beyond logic and breaks immersion heavily.

Two computers working side by side would indeed process the data twice as quick.
But the computing power required is expenential.
It's not that there's a penaltiy, it's more than getting 100% resist is insanely difficult.
Going from 25% resist to 47% requires the computing power of one invuln but to get to 69% would take more than twice the processing power because the maths is more difficult.


Is that close enough to some kinda plauseable lore for you or do I have to say things like higsboson and mention then hiesnburge differential or some crap?

can you shut up and **** off now?

So i can't get two separate computers work on same aircraft at their full capacity because of? Because you know two separate computers work at their full capacity on aircrafts and also everywhere else without any "stacking penalty". This thing is too far beyond logic and breaks immersion heavily.

Actually, it would be, uh, 523%.


Sounds to me like you should quit and find a more realistic video game.

2 completely separate computer sure does work at their full capacity. But engineer would be called moron if he puts 2 completely separate computer into an aircraft. usually you want some level of interoperability. Or at very least use the very same set of input and output devices (for the cost sake). And at that point you get "stacking penalty" in real aircraft as well.

So with that logic if I put two engines in my car in theory that should give it 2x the speed, strangely this doesn't happen.

Or if I put 2 barrels in my gun I can kill two people with one shot ? No that didn't work either; Oh darn it looks like adding 1 + 1 isn't always 2 in RL.

Surprise. Boeing uses 5 to 7 completely separate backup systems that backs each other in case of fault and no they dont have any "stacking" penalties.

Surprise. Boeing uses 5 to 7 completely separate backup systems that backs each other in case of fault and no they dont have any "stacking" penalties.

actually, backup system are example of stacking penalty. most of the time, there is no benefit from that much safety.

Can i ask just one question concerning it? Then why having two torpedo launchers not causing stacking? What about not possible to fit two Damage Controls? Or how about fitting 6 salvagers not causing "stacking" due to higher requirements of power and cpu? Stacking is a good excuse but bad solution.

Thank you for attempting to explain it within the lore but no thank you for being rude.

If there wouldn't they would put 1 more system. Not 5.

So i can't get two separate computers work on same aircraft at their full capacity because of? Because you know two separate computers work at their full capacity on aircrafts and also everywhere else without any "stacking penalty". This thing is too far beyond logic and breaks immersion heavily.