| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Trace Kel'le
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 07:44:00 -
[1]
1) If you get your ship blown up by concord- You should NEVER get an insurance payout, if you have no ship you get the crappy velator. Insurance companies dont pay for criminal acts. Thats realism.
2) If youre an outlaw-youre an outlaw you dont get to run away after your ship is destroyed
If youre an outlaw(-10) in a highsec zone and you just podded someone, concord should pod you, not just destroy your ship. Destroying an outlaws ship and letting them run away is "carebear". If you want realism, then accept the idea that outlaws who kill people in lifeboats usually have short careers. Concord letting pirates off easy is "carebear for pirates".
3) Outlaws should be wanted dead or alive- Saying only the person killed has kill rights is carebear. The guys who dont or cant pvp should be able to transfer or even sell kill rights. If outlaws have killed so many people they have to worry who owns their killrights, THAT is not carebear that is deterrence.
4) Kill rights should not expire until the killer is killed.
|

Zar Terra
MacroIntel United Corporations Against Macros
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 07:48:00 -
[2]
Just how many posts do we need about this before people get the idea and STFU about it ?!
-= NightShifter =-
Originally by: Dirk Magnum On the one hand I love a metaphorical trainwreck but come on. This is sort of like crashing a plane on top of a train that's already wrecked.
|

Future Mutant
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 08:50:00 -
[3]
i like my ideas better. 1. If your in a ship, and it uses mining lasers, the nearest ship should blow you up. 2. If your mining ship got blown up because you didnt bother fitting a tank- everyone points and laughs.
|

Dragonia Estire
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 09:21:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Dragonia Estire on 07/07/2009 09:22:10 nice set of feasible ideas, especially on number 1. Its rather logical and very implementable. Signed.
And the part of kill rights not expiring is correct too. Too many people rotate accounts to avoid getting hit bad by that clause. Which is a clear exploitation of the system/
|

Amber Saint
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 09:25:00 -
[5]
These changes would imply that there is something wrong with suicide ganking
Hint, there isn't, if you get suicide ganked you're a ****** or you shouldn't play afk
|

Intense Thinker
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 09:26:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Future Mutant i like my ideas better. 1. If your in a ship, and it uses mining lasers, the nearest ship should blow you up. 2. If your mining ship got blown up because you didnt bother fitting a tank- everyone points and laughs.
/signed
And did you know that this is in fact Surfin's Plunderbunny's forum alt? It's official! |

JitaTradingAlt
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 09:41:00 -
[7]
0/10 OP.
Horrible troll.
|

Lightningshade
Caldari The Athiest Syndicate Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 09:48:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Trace Kel'le 1) waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaa. I want my blankey
|

Vyrk
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 09:52:00 -
[9]
1) If you get your ship blown up by concord- You should NEVER get an insurance payout.
THIS IS DEFINITELY NEEDED !!!!
|

Lightningshade
Caldari The Athiest Syndicate Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 09:53:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Vyrk 1) I've also been ganked and not fitted any tank.waaaaaaa waaaaa
|

Vyrk
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 09:56:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Lightningshade dude has no idea
if only you had a clue bud.
but still if you get concorded you should not get insurance, its only right.
|

Lightningshade
Caldari The Athiest Syndicate Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 09:58:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Vyrk
Originally by: Lightningshade dude has no idea
if only you had a clue bud.
but still if you get concorded you should not get insurance, its only right.
I have a clue, your a disgruntled miner thats going to go out in your best fit merlin and seek revenge!
Personally, I applaud suicide ganks on hulks, as the hulks werent meant to be doign this, they wanted more from life.
|

Vyrk
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 10:02:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Lightningshade still looking for a clue
Posting to confirm this guy still hasnt got a clue !
|

RedSplat
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 10:22:00 -
[14]
**** SON, YOU GOT TROLLED
Originally by: CCP Mitnal
I don't sleep. I am always here. Watching. Waiting.
Originally by: CCP Mitnal it does get progressively longer.
|

Amber Saint
Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 10:24:00 -
[15]
If its a troll its a p pointless one
|

Sera Ryskin
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 10:52:00 -
[16]
Even simpler idea, re: suicide ganking: if you're stupid enough to go AFK with an expensive ship and get blown up, the game gives you a nice little "lol, you suck" popup message with a link to WoW. ==========
Merin is currently enjoying a 14 day vacation from the forums. Until she returns, you've got me to entertain you!
|

Another Whine
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 11:04:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Sera Ryskin Even simpler idea, re: suicide ganking: if you're stupid enough to go AFK with an expensive ship and get blown up, the game gives you a nice little "lol, you suck" popup message with a link to WoW.
I fully endorse this product and/or service
  
|

Concubinia Scarlett
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 11:28:00 -
[18]
Insurance not paying out for concorded ships....
Im sure that a small gang of t1 gank destroyers getting a 100mil+ hulk kill (up to a bil if T2 cargo rigs fitted ) in hisec will be mortified to find out that the whole one million isk they spent on their ships isn't covered.
This change will stop the problem instantly.
|

guska Cryotank
Gallente All Tactical Telemetry Whiskey Creek Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 11:50:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Trace Kel'le Thats realism. If you want realism
Confirming that EVE is real
|

Havohej
Minmatar Du'uma Fiisi Integrated Astrometrics
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 11:52:00 -
[20]
Edited by: Havohej on 07/07/2009 11:54:59
Originally by: Trace Kel'le 1) If you get your ship blown up by concord- You should NEVER get an insurance payout, if you have no ship you get the crappy velator. Insurance companies dont pay for criminal acts. Thats realism.
No...
EVE takes place in a time and galaxy where megacorporations run everything. Pend Insurance is one such corporation. Pend Insurance doesn't give a damn how a ship is destroyed or by whom. Pend Insurance isn't connected to or affiliated with the CONCORD Assembly in any way, shape or form. Pend Insurance pays out on insurance claims involving ships that have been destroyed, according to the level of insurance purchased for those ships including the default payout if no such insurance purchase was made - the reasons for this free, default payout are numerous, but possibly the best reason is that a little easily-affordable kindness goes a long way toward advertising and drawing in new customers.
That's 'realism' in the context of EVE-Online's setting.
e: Also, I don't think you 'get' outlaws. Outlaws don't care about 'kill rights'. Outlaws are able to be attacked anywhere, any time, by anyone - that's part of being an 'outlaw'. What's more, the people who think 'kill rights' matter to outlaws are generally people the outlaws have no reason to be afraid of or even remotely concerned about to begin with - i.e.: people like the OP.
"You can still steal their stuff." - CCP Explorer
|

Lady Spank
Amarr Sekret Kool Klubb
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 12:00:00 -
[21]
Confirming your ideas are simple
The quality of my replies is directly related to the QQuality of the opÆs comments |

De'Veldrin
Minmatar Special Projects Executive
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 12:08:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Lady Spank Confirming your ideas are simple
Hey, Spank, how's the shooting at Lana going? --Vel
Experience is what you get right after you need it.
|

Sniper Wolf18
Gallente A Pretty Pony Princess General Tso's Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 12:09:00 -
[23]
Go here And to finish, thank you for reading my sig -------------------------------------------------- If you are still reading i would probably hav posted by now |

Alexi Rosso
Interstellar Waste Management
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 12:57:00 -
[24]
Originally by: guska Cryotank
Originally by: Trace Kel'le Thats realism. If you want realism
Confirming that EVE is real
|

Lady Spank
Amarr Sekret Kool Klubb
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 13:30:00 -
[25]
Originally by: De'Veldrin
Originally by: Lady Spank Confirming your ideas are simple
Hey, Spank, how's the shooting at Lana going?
Update is here. Haven't caught her online where she's willing to fight since first blood 
The quality of my replies is directly related to the QQuality of the opÆs comments |

Shade Millith
International House of PWNCakes
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 13:53:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Trace Kel'le 1) If you get your ship blown up by concord- You should NEVER get an insurance payout, if you have no ship you get the crappy velator. Insurance companies dont pay for criminal acts. Thats realism.
Fine by me, for no insurance however, concord has to be un-buffed back to it's slower responce time.
You lot can't have it both ways --------------------------------------------
|

Larkonis TrassIer
Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 14:21:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Trace Kel'le 1) If you get your ship blown up by concord- You should NEVER get an insurance payout, if you have no ship you get the crappy velator. Insurance companies dont pay for criminal acts. Thats realism.
Cool. This was one of the suggestions last time carebears were getting hysterical about suicide ganking. It's not going to happen because too many noob pilots commit mistakes and end up getting Concorded. CCP instead opted to buff Concord and increase response times. Regardless, for the average suicide ganker the limiting factor is not cost but sec status. One can generally get away with 2-3 ganks per security level of system. Then it requires a good amount of grinding in 0.0 to be able to re-enter that system.
Quote: 2) If youre an outlaw-youre an outlaw you dont get to run away after your ship is destroyed If youre an outlaw(-10) in a highsec zone and you just podded someone, concord should pod you, not just destroy your ship. Destroying an outlaws ship and letting them run away is "carebear". If you want realism, then accept the idea that outlaws who kill people in lifeboats usually have short careers. Concord letting pirates off easy is "carebear for pirates".
Very rarely will suicide ganks result in poddings, unless one is going crazy with smartbombs, due to either sec concerns or being exploded as one is locking up the pod.
Quote:
3) Outlaws should be wanted dead or alive- Saying only the person killed has kill rights is carebear. The guys who dont or cant pvp should be able to transfer or even sell kill rights. If outlaws have killed so many people they have to worry who owns their killrights, THAT is not carebear that is deterrence.
You know you can shoot outlaws anywhere any time? If you have killrights on a player who is able to enter hisec then follow him for a while on an alt or whatever, see if he ever flies any non combat ships. People have lost all sorts of expensive vessels right up to jump freighters because they were parading about in hisec afk with killrights on them. Transferable killrights are cool and everything but the system is potentially open to exploitation much like maneuvering next to someone then having an application to the corp that is at war with said person accepted is now an exploit. Man up, don't let the bullies kick sand in your face and get your own revenge.
Quote:
4) Kill rights should not expire until the killer is killed.
If you are that desperate to kill someone and can't do it in 30 days then you fail quite frankly.
TL;DR
Carebears are currently getting hysterical about suicide ganking again due to some recent high profile ganks being publicised and some vocal members of the community getting their internets spaceships blown up.
If you don't want to get ganked:
-Transport valuable cargo in an approapriate ship type with approapriate fittings. -Don't use autopilot.
-Mine in hisec at least 2-3 jumps out from 'lowsec pirate hotspots'
-Set any pirate corps operating in the area to red so you know if a large number hop into local to deprive you of your virginity and your hulk.
-AFK = Automatically F***ing Dead
Really gents, it's not rocket science.
Fighting for justice
|

Grunanca
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 14:57:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Trace Kel'le 1) If you get your ship blown up by concord- You should NEVER get an insurance payout, if you have no ship you get the crappy velator. Insurance companies dont pay for criminal acts. Thats realism.
2) If youre an outlaw-youre an outlaw you dont get to run away after your ship is destroyed
If youre an outlaw(-10) in a highsec zone and you just podded someone, concord should pod you, not just destroy your ship. Destroying an outlaws ship and letting them run away is "carebear". If you want realism, then accept the idea that outlaws who kill people in lifeboats usually have short careers. Concord letting pirates off easy is "carebear for pirates".
3) Outlaws should be wanted dead or alive- Saying only the person killed has kill rights is carebear. The guys who dont or cant pvp should be able to transfer or even sell kill rights. If outlaws have killed so many people they have to worry who owns their killrights, THAT is not carebear that is deterrence.
4) Kill rights should not expire until the killer is killed.
1: Agree, but its not the pirate's fault this isnt implemented, its the same ******ed people that sits afk and mine all night or haul billions worth of stuff afk in a tech 1 hauler, as they still with the warning popup manages to get concorded. How they do it is simply beoynd my comprehension!
2: Unless pirates auto pods you in low sec when your ship dies, just no... You already have sentry guns, faction npcs, concord and 23/7 killrights on all pirates, why dont you smartbomb at the gates the pirates return their pos at? I have actually seen that.. You can do it without getting concorded, we cant, so stop crying...
3: This just shows you got no clue... Pirates can be attacked anytime anywhere, most people are just too stupid to do something about it. A hint for you would be to fly something other than a hulk and maybe use EFT to make some fits. Maybe if you spend a couple of hundred hours you will find a competitive fit.
|

Lubomir Penev
Dark Nexxus
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 15:29:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Dragonia Estire
And the part of kill rights not expiring is correct too. Too many people rotate accounts to avoid getting hit bad by that clause. Which is a clear exploitation of the system/
What do you mean by rotate account? -- 081014 : emoragequit, char transfered to a friend, 090317 : back to original owner blog |

Awesome Possum
Insert Obscure Latin Name
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 16:24:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Trace Kel'le 1) If you get your ship blown up by concord- You should NEVER get an insurance payout, if you have no ship you get the crappy velator. Insurance companies dont pay for criminal acts. Thats realism.
Quote: its not going to happen.
Know why? Carebear morons that either get suckered into shooting ninja salvagers, or try/do suicide gank ninja salvagers. Those bears would lose out on the insurance for their ships, and they just won't stand for that.
Also, as I have stated, the numerous newbies that accidentally shoot buddies while learning this game. My best friend did it and I warned him what would happen. He was still learning the overview/targeting and got concorded.
"Hey CCP, I'm new and I just shot my friend while missioning by accident and I got blowed up by your cops.. why didn't my insurance thing work?"
"Oh sorry new guy, the afk miners whined about it and so you're not getting insurance now."
"but... they have millions, I'm brand new and all my money was in that ship!"
"sorry new guy"
"k i quit, back to wow!"
yeah... right. CCP will never take insurance payouts away from criminal acts.
Keep trying and crying. I think I'll go gank a hulk now.
♥
Wreck Disposal Services |

Awesome Possum
Insert Obscure Latin Name
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 16:31:00 -
[31]
notanedit:
Oh yeah, I almost forgot.
A couple of meta 2-4 fitted dessies can pop a hulk. That's what? 5-10mill each?
I'd gladly drop that for the chance at a faction fit hulk.
Your ideas are just flawed, please stop suggesting them. ♥
Wreck Disposal Services |

Insurance Risk
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 18:36:00 -
[32]
Edited by: Insurance Risk on 07/07/2009 18:36:56 Remove ALL insurance payouts, make player wrecks mineable or salvageable for 1/3 of their mineral value. Remove all mineral sources (rocks, mission loot, refinable NPC goods) from highsec. Highsec should be about commerce and isk, lowsec and nullsec should supply the building materials.
|

Magnus Orin
Minmatar Heavy Influence
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 22:09:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Future Mutant
2. If your mining ship got blown up because you didnt bother fitting a tank- everyone points and laughs.
|

Misanth
Reaper Industries
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 22:17:00 -
[34]
Can we please remove rigs as well? Since people are too scared to take risks in their ships with the increased cost (since uhm, flying without rigs would be pretty damn stupid in many cases).. and say insurance is removed.. then we'll see even less people in low- and nullsec.
Hell, speaking of that, why not pull back EVE to what it was four-five years ago? No sov, no WTZ, back with freeform contract, insanely expensive t2 and implants, remove alot of the current ships, horrible logistics and barely any capital ships, market shortage for even basic t1 ships so even PvPer's have to support mining ops (as defensive- or hauling material), etc etc.
Also, icecream was alot cheaper a few years ago.  - I'd tell you why but then I'll have to kill you. And to kill you I'd have to log in. And to log in I'd have to stop browsing these forums. Both you and me knows that'll never happen. |

N'tek alar
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 22:27:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Misanth
Hell, speaking of that, why not pull back EVE to what it was four-five years ago? No sov, no WTZ, back with freeform contract, insanely expensive t2 and implants, remove alot of the current ships, horrible logistics and barely any capital ships, market shortage for even basic t1 ships so even PvPer's have to support mining ops (as defensive- or hauling material), etc etc.
Also, icecream was alot cheaper a few years ago. 
no sov, Yes please.
No WTZ, Great!
Freeform contracts back, Contracts didn't exist 4-5 years ago.
Expensive t2 back, Hell ****ing yeah!!!
Remove ships, meh, we've got too many anyway.
horrible logistics, As long as pos fueling disappears along with poses, sure.
Barely any capital ships, NO capital ships would be far better, But if we have to settle for having just a few, I guess that's alright.
Market shortage, Sure, Gives the traders more to do. |

Misanth
Reaper Industries
|
Posted - 2009.07.07 22:31:00 -
[36]
Originally by: N'tek alar Contracts didn't exist 4-5 years ago.
Autumn 2005 had contracts, I can't remember what kinds but I did bookmarks scams with em. Uhm yah so bit under four years ago, but it was '05.  - I'd tell you why but then I'll have to kill you. And to kill you I'd have to log in. And to log in I'd have to stop browsing these forums. Both you and me knows that'll never happen. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |