EVE Search - FW Republic Fleet target painter and more

All Channels

Warfare & Tactics

FW Republic Fleet target painter and more

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Shepard Book Imperial Academy	Posted - 2009.07.14 21:12:00 - [1] Republic Fleet target painter: Attributes: 32% signature radius to target for 25 CPU Target Painter II Attributes: 30% signature radius to target for 24 CPU Target painters have to be the least used EW module in the PvP. Painters are mainly used by carebear missile boats and bombers. Bombers can not even use bombs in FW which cripples their role. It would make more since to me to add all EW modules for all the races (webs and points included) than painters and omnis...Please put more thought into this before you roll it out. Giving Minmatar painters is a slap in the face yet again. BTW Gallente need more loving than any race in FW. Give them Disruptors and scramblers to have a reason to play a come back game vs more numbers. See how much FW pilot numbers increase if you add all EW modules to the loot tables. Just my two cents for what they are worth.
Steve Celeste Caldari Overdogs	Posted - 2009.07.14 21:34:00 - [2] Minmatar = Warpaint = Painters = Target Painters. CCP content developers actually think like this.
Loco Eve	Posted - 2009.07.14 21:37:00 - [3] Originally by: Shepard Book Republic Fleet target painter: Attributes: 32% signature radius to target for 25 CPU Target Painter II Attributes: 30% signature radius to target for 24 CPU Target painters have to be the least used EW module in the PvP. Painters are mainly used by carebear missile boats and bombers. Bombers can not even use bombs in FW which cripples their role. It would make more since to me to add all EW modules for all the races (webs and points included) than painters and omnis...Please put more thought into this before you roll it out. Giving Minmatar painters is a slap in the face yet again. BTW Gallente need more loving than any race in FW. Give them Disruptors and scramblers to have a reason to play a come back game vs more numbers. See how much FW pilot numbers increase if you add all EW modules to the loot tables. Just my two cents for what they are worth.
Loco Eve	Posted - 2009.07.14 21:39:00 - [4] Edited by: Loco Eve on 14/07/2009 21:41:27 Originally by: Shepard Book Republic Fleet target painter: Attributes: 32% signature radius to target for 25 CPU Target Painter II Attributes: 30% signature radius to target for 24 CPU Target painters have to be the least used EW module in the PvP. Painters are mainly used by carebear missile boats and bombers. Bombers can not even use bombs in FW which cripples their role. It would make more since to me to add all EW modules for all the races (webs and points included) than painters and omnis...Please put more thought into this before you roll it out. Giving Minmatar painters is a slap in the face yet again. BTW Gallente need more loving than any race in FW. Give them Disruptors and scramblers to have a reason to play a come back game vs more numbers. See how much FW pilot numbers increase if you add all EW modules to the loot tables. Just my two cents for what they are worth. stupid browser didn't register first quote FYI Gallente ships are the only ones with bonus' for warp disruptors. Ever heard of an Arazu. just like matar have web with Rapier. Amarr nuet with Curse and Caldari jam with Falcon. Don't forget about their Combat Recon variant's as well. Also, TP's are very usefull ew mod. maybe, you're just not in the right fleet to know how effective it really is?
Ulstan	Posted - 2009.07.15 14:43:00 - [5] Originally by: Shepard Book Republic Fleet target painter: Attributes: 32% signature radius to target for 25 CPU Target Painter II Attributes: 30% signature radius to target for 24 CPU Target painters have to be the least used EW module in the PvP. Painters are mainly used by carebear missile boats and bombers. If no one uses missiles or bombers in PvP, then it's time for a serious boost to these ships and weapon systems. If you do use torpedos and such, target painters are great (because you don't get tracking computers).
Aria Kink Amarr 501st Providence Light Defense Squadron	Posted - 2009.07.15 16:19:00 - [6] Originally by: Shepard Book Republic Fleet target painter: Attributes: 32% signature radius to target for 25 CPU Target Painter II Attributes: 30% signature radius to target for 24 CPU Target painters have to be the least used EW module in the PvP. Painters are mainly used by carebear missile boats and bombers. Bombers can not even use bombs in FW which cripples their role. It would make more since to me to add all EW modules for all the races (webs and points included) than painters and omnis...Please put more thought into this before you roll it out. Giving Minmatar painters is a slap in the face yet again. BTW Gallente need more loving than any race in FW. Give them Disruptors and scramblers to have a reason to play a come back game vs more numbers. See how much FW pilot numbers increase if you add all EW modules to the loot tables. Just my two cents for what they are worth. You sir are an idiot if you think target painters are only used on missile boats, and in PvE. Read up on what they actually do before going to a forum to post about how useless they are. At any point in time, a disapointingly low % of the Earths population are on fire....
Omara Otawan	Posted - 2009.07.15 18:47:00 - [7] Originally by: Shepard Book Republic Fleet target painter: Attributes: 32% signature radius to target for 25 CPU Target Painter II Attributes: 30% signature radius to target for 24 CPU What can I say, CCP loves minmatar
Shepard Book Imperial Academy	Posted - 2009.07.15 18:48:00 - [8] Speaking from a 0.0 perspective most Minmatar recon and EW frig pilots would rather double up on nerfed webs than use target painters. Go look at any major alliance killboard in 0.0 and you will start to see what I am talking about. IMO 0.0 dictates a lot on how pvp is done. Empire is just watered down PvP to me. Yes target painters help a bomber with torps. If you are flying a bomber in FW you are using a crippled ship. A major part of bombers is lost in empire. It turns into a paper thin damage dealing ship that can not use bombs. There are much better ships for that role. This in turn should make target painters even used less in empire.
inyreye Beyond Divinity Inc	Posted - 2009.07.16 23:46:00 - [9] Originally by: Shepard Book IMO 0.0 dictates a lot on how pvp is done. Empire is just watered down PvP to me. The only real PVP exists in 0.0! right.
Lilith Velkor Minmatar Beyond Divinity Inc	Posted - 2009.07.17 00:02:00 - [10] Originally by: inyreye Originally by: Shepard Book IMO 0.0 dictates a lot on how pvp is done. Empire is just watered down PvP to me. The only real PVP exists in 0.0! right. Hehehe, its kinda funny, look at how the "established 0.0 pvp corps" get absolutely massacred if they try to fight in lowsec.
Shepard Book Imperial Academy	Posted - 2009.07.17 00:42:00 - [11] Fair enough. I know there are gate guns and concord in certain parts of empire compared to dictor bubbles, mobiles, bombs, capitals, titans. I am sure I am missing something. Truth be told I would like to see gate guns moved to gates and stations in 0.0. I would also like to see Small NPC fleets controlled by 0.0 alliances in provinces and above. But that is just me )

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.