| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bater Fret
   |
Posted - 2009.07.18 22:25:00 -
[1]
It is a screwed up deal that CCP allows corp members to remote repair their friend in highsec when there is a non-war fight. Like when a person flips a can, the miner and his corp mates are allowed to attack the can flipper. But, the can flipper is allowed to have his corp mates remote repair him and that should be concidered a hostile event against the miner and his corp, which SHOULD bring in concord to destroy the remote repair ship. This would only be fair, the thief should have defend his actions alone.
|
Justin Mark
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 22:40:00 -
[2]
Cool story brah
|
Cindy McCain
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 22:40:00 -
[3]
How about you wardec their corp and do something about it instead of complaining about how life is so unfair in the 'crime and punishment' sub forum?
|
Cindy McCain
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 22:43:00 -
[4]
ugh I wish CCP would hold my hand for me 
|
Intense Thinker
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 22:49:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Intense Thinker on 18/07/2009 22:50:18
A goon making a useful post?  *Checks to see if the sky is falling*
The remote rep ship isn't doing anything wrong... he's just helping someone that's not a criminal
Wait, is this a troll? 
And did you know that this is in fact Surfin's Plunderbunny's forum alt? It's official! |
Bater Fret
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 22:53:00 -
[6]
it was the criminal that was being repaired, becuase the thief couldn't fight one on one becuase it was losing until his buddy started to rep him.
|
Grann Thefauto
Internal Anarchy
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 22:56:00 -
[7]
Shoot his buddy then.
|
Amy Mouse
Intersteller Manufacturing
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 23:51:00 -
[8]
 Originally by: Grann Thefauto
Shoot his buddy then.
or you could have self destructed
|
Maximal Damage
|
Posted - 2009.07.19 02:59:00 -
[9]
ORE THIEVES ~ CAN FLIPPERS
I think the terms need to be more defined on the overview on who you may aggress and who may aggress you once you have started to aggress in this type of situation. I have been killing for years and I have no problems using the settings of today to know the recourse of my aggressive action. Thieves do take a security hit I believe. But if I am able to attack a repper for repping the aggressor I should be able to do it without opening up possible aggression to the others in the aggressors party. I slightly aggree with this post because of the circumstances. Maybe CCP should think about creating an area where thieving from cans isn't possible or passworded jet cans that require skills.
You don't aggree with me then say something so I can kill you for opening your trap, chumps.! Want some, come get some!
Y A R R
|
Mickey Simon
Noir.
|
Posted - 2009.07.19 04:59:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Maximal Damage
Best troll I've read in a while.
n1.
|
Xenophanes Colophon
|
Posted - 2009.07.19 05:19:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Xenophanes Colophon on 19/07/2009 05:21:53
Originally by: Maximal Damage
ORE THIEVES ~ CAN FLIPPERS
I think the terms need to be more defined on the overview on who you may aggress and who may aggress you once you have started to aggress in this type of situation. I have been killing for years and I have no problems using the settings of today to know the recourse of my aggressive action. Thieves do take a security hit I believe. But if I am able to attack a repper for repping the aggressor I should be able to do it without opening up possible aggression to the others in the aggressors party. I slightly aggree with this post because of the circumstances. Maybe CCP should think about creating an area where thieving from cans isn't possible or passworded jet cans that require skills.
You don't aggree with me then say something so I can kill you for opening your trap, chumps.! Want some, come get some!
YAR R
You mean something like secure containers? Oh... wait... Only problem with secure containers are their size, other than that they're what all these jet can miners should be using anyways.
Originally by: Bater Fret
It is a screwed up deal that CCP allows corp members to remote repair their friend in highsec when there is a non-war fight. Like when a person flips a can, the miner and his corp mates are allowed to attack the can flipper. But, the can flipper is allowed to have his corp mates remote repair him and that should be concidered a hostile event against the miner and his corp, which SHOULD bring in concord to destroy the remote repair ship. This would only be fair, the thief should have defend his actions alone.
When a RR ship starts repping someone you're shooting you get the ability to shoot it, too. It's the exact same mechanics as when a RR ship helps a GCC. They get flagged the same as the GCC, as does the RR ship repping the criminal you have aggression rights on. The mechanics are fine. Only reason you have a problem with them is likely because you got blown up, right? Next time bring more people or don't jet can mine!
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |