| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
   |
Posted - 2009.08.08 12:18:00 -
[31]
They should have just merged tracking and signature resolution into a single number, that way you could easily compare turrets of all sizes.
However, it would make the big turrets look VERY ugly compared to the small ones (and some weird looking numbers) 
To exemplify :
125mm Gattling autocannons : 0.009875 rad/(sec*m)
425mm Railguns : 0.0000240625 rad/(sec*m)
Now... doesn't that just look weird ?
EVE issues|Mining revamp|Build stuff|Make ISK |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 12:22:00 -
[32]
 Originally by: Akita T
125mm Gattling autocannons : 0.009875 rad/(sec*m)
425mm Railguns : 0.0000240625 rad/(sec*m)
Granted, they could express them in degrees/(sec*km) to make them more palatable, but still...
125mm Gattling : 565.795823 degree/(sec*km)
425mm Railgun : 1.37867969 degree/(sec*km)
...bleh
EVE issues|Mining revamp|Build stuff|Make ISK |
Tippia
Raddick Explorations
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 14:07:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Akita T
125mm Gattling autocannons : 0.009875 rad/(sec*m)
425mm Railguns : 0.0000240625 rad/(sec*m)
Granted, they could express them in degrees/(sec*km) to make them more palatable, but still...
125mm Gattling : 565.795823 degree/(sec*km)
425mm Railgun : 1.37867969 degree/(sec*km)
...bleh
If you do that, you just know that someone will want to combine the target's angular velocity and sig radius into one, and that would also look wierd.
I mean, wth kind of unit of measurement is "degrees per ship-length-meter-second"? 
———
“If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡…
you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.”
— Karath Piki |
Beverly Sparks
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 14:27:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Akita T
They should have just merged tracking and signature resolution into a single number, that way you could easily compare turrets of all sizes.
However, it would make the big turrets look VERY ugly compared to the small ones (and some weird looking numbers)
To exemplify :
125mm Gattling autocannons : 0.009875 rad/(sec*m)
425mm Railguns : 0.0000240625 rad/(sec*m)
Now... doesn't that just look weird ?
Can you put those in scientific notation please... that will stop them from looking weird.
|
Beverly Sparks
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 14:29:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Tippia
Edited by: Tippia on 08/08/2009 14:25:47
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Akita T
125mm Gattling autocannons : 0.009875 rad/(sec*m)
425mm Railguns : 0.0000240625 rad/(sec*m)
Granted, they could express them in degrees/(sec*km) to make them more palatable, but still...
125mm Gattling : 565.795823 degree/(sec*km)
425mm Railgun : 1.37867969 degree/(sec*km)
...bleh
If you do that, you just know that someone will want to combine the target's angular velocity and sig radius into one, and that would also look wierd.
I mean, wth kind of unit of measurement is "radians per ship-length-meter-second"?
Myabe we should all just play online war,(the card game). That should simplify it. Aces are high.
|
LordThyGod
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 15:23:00 -
[36]
both guns in my example were well within optimal, rokh with bs 5
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2009.08.08 15:36:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Beverly Sparks
Can you put those in scientific notation please... that will stop them from looking weird.
The only place where I have seen scientific notations in EVE was on stars showinfo and such...
EVE issues|Mining revamp|Build stuff|Make ISK |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |