EVE Search - New hulls

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

New hulls

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
4THELULZ	Posted - 2009.08.18 22:44:00 - [31] Fix the existing ships before adding new ones.
wicker man The Gemini Factor Swords of Athena	Posted - 2009.08.19 03:59:00 - [32] i agree with the idea to fix the ships we have now. to add new ones the game works on progress, so adding more T2/T3 ships would be in the interest of the community? only reason to add new hulls would be as a base for making T2 versions for the advance? (btw the tier 2 battle cruisers were added late 2007, 1 new combat ship for each race including the drake lol) I only pod because I don't want them to have a long trip back.
Sir Substance Minmatar MagiTech Alliance Inc. MagiTech Corp	Posted - 2009.08.19 04:18:00 - [33] Originally by: Schalac Most players can't even field all of the ships in game. Why make new ones? because some of us can, at least for t1, and i for one want new toys. ------ I, for one, welcome our new console overlords!
Jettisoned Can Jenova's Witnesses	Posted - 2009.08.19 18:04:00 - [34] Originally by: wicker man (btw the tier 2 battle cruisers were added late 2007, 1 new combat ship for each race including the drake lol) Uh, those were added with Revelations 1 in November of 2006. _________________________ Did you really not have enough room for me? I'm only 1m¦.
Jettisoned Can Jenova's Witnesses	Posted - 2009.08.20 19:34:00 - [35] Another possibility for the BCs would be: Amarr: leave as combat BC (Khanid missile boat) Caldari: leave as EW BC Gallente: astrometrics BC 8/4/6 7 turrets, 50 MB/s drone 10% scan strength of probes per level 5% medium hybrid turret damage per level Minmatar: logistics BC 8/6/4 4 turrets, 50 MB/s drone -10% capacitor use of armor and shield transporters per level 15% armor and shield transporter effectiveness per level Role bonus: 500% shield and armor transporter range _________________________ Did you really not have enough room for me? I'm only 1m¦.
Zari Iraz	Posted - 2009.08.20 20:51:00 - [36] T2 Battlecruisers would definitely be nice, expecially with racial EWar. Would make PVP A LOT more interesting as Gallente would have bonus for warp disruption (gate ganking would be easier), target painting would allow for better killing of smaller ships, would be nice to have an ecm boat that can just obliterate anything, and sensor dampeners would just kill anybody that tried to target you. It would be nice to get a frigate built for tanking though. (Maybe enough to tank gate guns? Haha)
Jettisoned Can Jenova's Witnesses	Posted - 2009.08.21 18:05:00 - [37] Originally by: Zari Iraz T2 Battlecruisers would definitely be nice, expecially with racial EWar. Would make PVP A LOT more interesting as Gallente would have bonus for warp disruption (gate ganking would be easier), target painting would allow for better killing of smaller ships, would be nice to have an ecm boat that can just obliterate anything, and sensor dampeners would just kill anybody that tried to target you. It would be nice to get a frigate built for tanking though. (Maybe enough to tank gate guns? Haha) While a command ship version of combat recons would be interesting, that isn't exactly what I was talking about. _________________________ Did you really not have enough room for me? I'm only 1m¦.
Mannliche Frau Caldari	Posted - 2009.08.23 05:35:00 - [38] I'd rather see new destroyers introduced first based off of drones for the gals & missiles for caldari. Amarr and matari are a little harder since they only have one weapon system.
Bloody2k Gallente SCHWARZSCHILD.	Posted - 2009.08.23 10:31:00 - [39] Quote: Fix the existing ships before adding new ones. I hate this statement`s. New ships and fixing existing are not in competition to each other! It have to happen simultaneous. Fix problems and release new. Signature needs to be EVE related, please change. ~Weatherman
Jettisoned Can Jenova's Witnesses	Posted - 2009.08.23 19:05:00 - [40] Originally by: Mannliche Frau I'd rather see new destroyers introduced first based off of drones for the gals & missiles for caldari. Amarr and matari are a little harder since they only have one weapon system. Originally by: EdwardNardella I want a new destroyer and Tech 2 Tier 2 battlecruisers T2 DRAKE FTW! Originally by: Metalcali I wouldn't mind a new BC and Destroyer myself for each race. OK, how about these for new tier 2 destroyers: Amarr: Sonneillon Appearance: Flying wing style, but set on its side. (vertical) Slightly modify its shape to resemble the inquisitor to make the line of Khanid ships go from frigate to BS. 8 launchers 8/3/4 5% bonus to rocket damage per level 5% bonus to rocket and missile explosion velocity per level Role bonus: 50% rocket and missile max velocity Role penalty: -25% rocket and missile damage Caldari: Puffin 8 launchers 8/5/2 3% reduction of Light Missile damage reduction factor per level 10% bonus to Rocket and Light Missile velocity per level Role bonus: 50% rocket and missile max velocity Role penalty: -25% rocket and missile damage Bonuses of missile ships taken from each races interdictor. Damage penalty rather than RoF to reduce alpha strike. Gallente: 5 turrets, 25 MB/s drone 6/3/4 10% drone damage and hitpoints per level 7.5% drone optimal range and tracking per level Role bonus: 50% drone MWD velocity Role penalty: -25% drone RoF Minmatar: Chopper 8 turrets 8/4/3 10% small projectile turret falloff per level 5% ship velocity per level Role bonus: 50% small projectile turret falloff Role penalty: -25% turret RoF More of a fast AC ship than the thrasher _________________________ Did you really not have enough room for me? I'm only 1m¦.
Navarre Fuego	Posted - 2009.08.23 19:43:00 - [41] With the recent changes to make rigs easier to use on smaller ships, I would have thought that T2 destroyer hulls designed for salvage would have been in the plans, also Science Cruisers (bonus to astrometrics as per covert ops but better able to do stuff in WHs) and / or Industrials, perhaps made by Sisters / Ore like the Orca rather than just being faction-specific new hulls. I don't really see much additional need for t1 BCs, but new cruiser hulls to fill out some of the racial ethos (not to balance them so all races are effectively the same) and making the non-ECM ewar more effective has got to be better than making all races have an ECM specific ship each. Also, why the he11 is the Eos based on a Brutix hull? (slightly out of context) surely as a drone based command ship it should be based on the Myrmidon hull? a little more flesh on the bones of the RP would be quite nice, but the point about sniper ships for those races that don't have them makes some sense.
MaxxOmega Caldari Rukongai Sc0rched Earth	Posted - 2009.08.23 20:13:00 - [42] I'd like to see the Tech 3 Cruisers either beefed up OR the prices lowered. Then come out with a Tech 3 Battle Cruiser for today's T3 prices. I'd really like to see 8 high slots instead of 6 max.
De Guantanamo	Posted - 2009.08.24 00:03:00 - [43] Originally by: Jettisoned Can Originally by: Mike C Rorqual, Orca. Add magnate to your list, but I said combat ships. (Yes I know magnate previously existed in gold and silver forms, but was so rare that it may well have not existed at all) Who said Rorqual's not a combat ship Rorqual of Doom
Jettisoned Can Jenova's Witnesses	Posted - 2009.08.27 19:37:00 - [44] With the new set of tier 2 BCs, a new set of command ships could be introduced and have field command ships hull changed to make all command ships have unique hulls. Tactical command ships would require command ships 1, racial cruiser 5, and recon ships 4. They would be the next level up of combat recon ships. Amarr: Damnation-Prophesy hull Absolution-Harbinger hull Tactical command ship-new BC hull Caldari: Vulture-Ferox hull NH-Drake hull Tactical command ship-new BC hull Gallente: Eos-Brutix hull Astarte-new BC hull Tactical command ship-Myrm hull Minmatar: Claymore-Cyclone hull Sleipnir-Hurricane hull Tactical command ship-new BC hull _________________________ Did you really not have enough room for me? I'm only 1m¦.
Aias Telemonias	Posted - 2009.08.28 03:35:00 - [45] i'm down for the idea of making a second destroyer hull for each race... and making it useful for combat, not just salvaging (but keep the originals! i use mine to salvage like crazy!)
miss Hail	Posted - 2009.08.28 14:15:00 - [46] i would love 12 new hulls, but CCP is too lazy atm to do that. they made a drama for the request of adding a 3rd turret on the naglfar go figure 12 new ships
Krystal Flores	Posted - 2009.09.01 04:43:00 - [47] yes this would be cool
Sciencegeek deathdealer	Posted - 2009.09.01 05:55:00 - [48] Edited by: Sciencegeek deathdealer on 01/09/2009 06:00:32 Originally by: Bumbo Ras Originally by: 666Devious I'll be happy with faction battlecruisers. /signed Where the hell are they? sign for them at - http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1090233 -Geek p.s. elite bs are alread ingame- http://kepfeltoltes.hu/090820/1044701568elitepoc_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.jpg EDIT:Super fail at posting!!

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.