EVE Search - [VIDEO] Dances with Xetic

All Channels

My EVE

[VIDEO] Dances with Xetic

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Daakkon	Posted - 2004.10.13 07:36:00 - [61] if he meant the cruisers then hes an idiot if he meant the bs's then hes right... dual mwd ravens suck www.dark-cartel.com
Daakkon	Posted - 2004.10.13 07:36:00 - [62] if he meant the cruisers then hes an idiot if he meant the bs's then hes right... dual mwd ravens suck www.dark-cartel.com
Tansien	Posted - 2004.10.13 08:45:00 - [63] You guys can complain about our tactics all you want, but as long as they're effective, we're gonna use em, it's not our problem if you're *****ing about em. :)
Tansien	Posted - 2004.10.13 08:45:00 - [64] You guys can complain about our tactics all you want, but as long as they're effective, we're gonna use em, it's not our problem if you're *****ing about em. :)
Nafri	Posted - 2004.10.13 10:15:00 - [65] well nice video but your pilot has to learn how to use a dual mwd rupture and how to set it up since it doesnt look like xetic had any support ships you could have orbited and pwned them a bit more Wanna fly with me?
Nafri	Posted - 2004.10.13 10:15:00 - [66] well nice video but your pilot has to learn how to use a dual mwd rupture and how to set it up since it doesnt look like xetic had any support ships you could have orbited and pwned them a bit more Wanna fly with me?
Lowa	Posted - 2004.10.13 11:06:00 - [67] I thought this was kinda cool actually and it looked smooth and not laggy at all. Nice and long fight as well. Also, very sweet for being your first movie! Regards, LOWA Oh! Yeah! Huh! MC - Going funky all over your clone baby!
Lowa	Posted - 2004.10.13 11:06:00 - [68] I thought this was kinda cool actually and it looked smooth and not laggy at all. Nice and long fight as well. Also, very sweet for being your first movie! Regards, LOWA Oh! Yeah! Huh! MC - Going funky all over your clone baby!
The End	Posted - 2004.10.13 11:34:00 - [69] Originally by: Teelmaster Originally by: The End Edited by: The End on 13/10/2004 01:20:08 Originally by: Teelmaster Eh, boring movie. Just a rupture strafing back and forth. Nothing special really. you sir know nothing of pvp HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! Ahh yes i know nothing about pvp while being in m0o for the last 9 months....shut your mouth before you make yourself looks stupid again and unplug your keyboard nubje. wow you were in m0o for 9 months congrats! that still doesnt mean you know pvp As far as im concerned you could have just been the mascot or even the waterboy.. To say what you did about the vid. basically sums up your whole 9 months. i think we need dakkons famous tech II tissue here good day sir.
The End	Posted - 2004.10.13 11:34:00 - [70] Originally by: Teelmaster Originally by: The End Edited by: The End on 13/10/2004 01:20:08 Originally by: Teelmaster Eh, boring movie. Just a rupture strafing back and forth. Nothing special really. you sir know nothing of pvp HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! Ahh yes i know nothing about pvp while being in m0o for the last 9 months....shut your mouth before you make yourself looks stupid again and unplug your keyboard nubje. wow you were in m0o for 9 months congrats! that still doesnt mean you know pvp As far as im concerned you could have just been the mascot or even the waterboy.. To say what you did about the vid. basically sums up your whole 9 months. i think we need dakkons famous tech II tissue here good day sir.
qrac	Posted - 2004.10.13 12:01:00 - [71] i hate those ruptures combined with interceptors. 1 on 1 they're pretty easy to kill because they think they're invulnerable :) ------------------------------------------- Insanes numquam moriuntur!
qrac	Posted - 2004.10.13 12:01:00 - [72] i hate those ruptures combined with interceptors. 1 on 1 they're pretty easy to kill because they think they're invulnerable :) ------------------------------------------- Insanes numquam moriuntur!
Teelmaster	Posted - 2004.10.13 12:11:00 - [73] Originally by: The End Originally by: Teelmaster Originally by: The End Edited by: The End on 13/10/2004 01:20:08 Originally by: Teelmaster Eh, boring movie. Just a rupture strafing back and forth. Nothing special really. you sir know nothing of pvp HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! Ahh yes i know nothing about pvp while being in m0o for the last 9 months....shut your mouth before you make yourself looks stupid again and unplug your keyboard nubje. wow you were in m0o for 9 months congrats! that still doesnt mean you know pvp As far as im concerned you could have just been the mascot or even the waterboy.. To say what you did about the vid. basically sums up your whole 9 months. i think we need dakkons famous tech II tissue here good day sir. Ok the video was 10 minutes of a rupture strafing ridiculously fast, going back and forth scrambling people. And they killed 4 bs's. Kudos. GJ. Wow.
Teelmaster	Posted - 2004.10.13 12:11:00 - [74] Originally by: The End Originally by: Teelmaster Originally by: The End Edited by: The End on 13/10/2004 01:20:08 Originally by: Teelmaster Eh, boring movie. Just a rupture strafing back and forth. Nothing special really. you sir know nothing of pvp HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! Ahh yes i know nothing about pvp while being in m0o for the last 9 months....shut your mouth before you make yourself looks stupid again and unplug your keyboard nubje. wow you were in m0o for 9 months congrats! that still doesnt mean you know pvp As far as im concerned you could have just been the mascot or even the waterboy.. To say what you did about the vid. basically sums up your whole 9 months. i think we need dakkons famous tech II tissue here good day sir. Ok the video was 10 minutes of a rupture strafing ridiculously fast, going back and forth scrambling people. And they killed 4 bs's. Kudos. GJ. Wow.
Schroni	Posted - 2004.10.13 12:28:00 - [75] the vid was good, liked the music too. Tho what i'd love to see is that people start to edit their videos to "match" the music a bit more, as in timing, not as in style. But that's only my personal opinion. Keep them coming anyways --- SNIGG Forums my videos
Schroni	Posted - 2004.10.13 12:28:00 - [76] the vid was good, liked the music too. Tho what i'd love to see is that people start to edit their videos to "match" the music a bit more, as in timing, not as in style. But that's only my personal opinion. Keep them coming anyways --- SNIGG Forums my videos
Tholarim	Posted - 2004.10.13 12:30:00 - [77] Originally by: BobGhengisKhan Edited by: BobGhengisKhan on 13/10/2004 04:58:54 The way the ruptures were set up made sure theyd have to run away and miss targets, if you had used 100 mn abs you could have orbited the targets and gotten more. You were all setup for long range and running away, which has its use I guess, but another setup would have let you get more kills in that first 8 on 4 with only slightly more risk to your cruisers. It took a very, very long time for the first ship to go down, and for that time the odds were stacked in your favor by a large margin I mean there were even times when the ship overshot the target because it was going so stupidly fast running away that the pilot didnt have time to scramble. When it happened at the planet and you 2 were alone, with plenty of time to scramble, such a wasted opportunity. I didnt finish the video after that part, because I got bored, maybe it gets better later I'm sure you'll take it as a flame because of my history speaking to Duke, but it isnt, I just dont get it. I mean you did win, but if you say its the "best battle youve ever been in," I dont believe you. If I were the leader and I saw such a huge gap in between scrambles, I would have been ****ed Well there are reasons for a lot in this fight. They had roughly 10 bs's in the area. Sometimes they were all in one place sometimes we made some warp out. Since they had 2/3 scorps in their fleet and we had none we got jammed quite frequently. We only had 4 ravens and since they cycle jammed we didn't take down targets very fast. What we were aiming for was making one warp out, then follow that one and gank his ass before his buddies came in. And we did that till we evened up the odds. Then they retreated when it was 7 of their bs's (no scorps) vs 4 of ours. And btw when only 2 of our support craft have scramblers i'm not gonna throw them into the fight and letting them stick close to their bs's, that results in them getting killed and us not getting fast scrambles. Since moving our 4 bs's close into their 8 is kinda stupid.... Anyways, flame on!
Tholarim	Posted - 2004.10.13 12:30:00 - [78] Originally by: BobGhengisKhan Edited by: BobGhengisKhan on 13/10/2004 04:58:54 The way the ruptures were set up made sure theyd have to run away and miss targets, if you had used 100 mn abs you could have orbited the targets and gotten more. You were all setup for long range and running away, which has its use I guess, but another setup would have let you get more kills in that first 8 on 4 with only slightly more risk to your cruisers. It took a very, very long time for the first ship to go down, and for that time the odds were stacked in your favor by a large margin I mean there were even times when the ship overshot the target because it was going so stupidly fast running away that the pilot didnt have time to scramble. When it happened at the planet and you 2 were alone, with plenty of time to scramble, such a wasted opportunity. I didnt finish the video after that part, because I got bored, maybe it gets better later I'm sure you'll take it as a flame because of my history speaking to Duke, but it isnt, I just dont get it. I mean you did win, but if you say its the "best battle youve ever been in," I dont believe you. If I were the leader and I saw such a huge gap in between scrambles, I would have been ****ed Well there are reasons for a lot in this fight. They had roughly 10 bs's in the area. Sometimes they were all in one place sometimes we made some warp out. Since they had 2/3 scorps in their fleet and we had none we got jammed quite frequently. We only had 4 ravens and since they cycle jammed we didn't take down targets very fast. What we were aiming for was making one warp out, then follow that one and gank his ass before his buddies came in. And we did that till we evened up the odds. Then they retreated when it was 7 of their bs's (no scorps) vs 4 of ours. And btw when only 2 of our support craft have scramblers i'm not gonna throw them into the fight and letting them stick close to their bs's, that results in them getting killed and us not getting fast scrambles. Since moving our 4 bs's close into their 8 is kinda stupid.... Anyways, flame on!
Marskalkur	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:34:00 - [79] Originally by: Korath Since when is helping to fight a battle at high speed an "exploit type" tactic? I never said it was. If I'm not mistaken there is even a ship class out there build for that purpose. although most ships I encounter outrun them atm. what I meant by "exploit type" is fitting 2 mwd's or 1 mwd and a oversized afterburner on a single ship. It's way unbalanced and CCP are working on that issue I belive. as much as I dislike these speed ships there is one comforting thing that comes to mind when I ecounter them and that is the enemy is actualy scared, and wants to make sure he can get out of fighting range before he loses his ship to a superior fighter. ps. keep the vids coming though.
Marskalkur	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:34:00 - [80] Originally by: Korath Since when is helping to fight a battle at high speed an "exploit type" tactic? I never said it was. If I'm not mistaken there is even a ship class out there build for that purpose. although most ships I encounter outrun them atm. what I meant by "exploit type" is fitting 2 mwd's or 1 mwd and a oversized afterburner on a single ship. It's way unbalanced and CCP are working on that issue I belive. as much as I dislike these speed ships there is one comforting thing that comes to mind when I ecounter them and that is the enemy is actualy scared, and wants to make sure he can get out of fighting range before he loses his ship to a superior fighter. ps. keep the vids coming though.
Tholarim	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:43:00 - [81] Originally by: Marskalkur Originally by: Korath Since when is helping to fight a battle at high speed an "exploit type" tactic? I never said it was. If I'm not mistaken there is even a ship class out there build for that purpose. although most ships I encounter outrun them atm. what I meant by "exploit type" is fitting 2 mwd's or 1 mwd and a oversized afterburner on a single ship. It's way unbalanced and CCP are working on that issue I belive. as much as I dislike these speed ships there is one comforting thing that comes to mind when I ecounter them and that is the enemy is actualy scared, and wants to make sure he can get out of fighting range before he loses his ship to a superior fighter. ps. keep the vids coming though. Using a different tactic is not being scared. Sorry we don't sit there and tank dmg like every lamer in the game. It's a different style of fighting.... But hey, that is a difficult concept.
Tholarim	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:43:00 - [82] Originally by: Marskalkur Originally by: Korath Since when is helping to fight a battle at high speed an "exploit type" tactic? I never said it was. If I'm not mistaken there is even a ship class out there build for that purpose. although most ships I encounter outrun them atm. what I meant by "exploit type" is fitting 2 mwd's or 1 mwd and a oversized afterburner on a single ship. It's way unbalanced and CCP are working on that issue I belive. as much as I dislike these speed ships there is one comforting thing that comes to mind when I ecounter them and that is the enemy is actualy scared, and wants to make sure he can get out of fighting range before he loses his ship to a superior fighter. ps. keep the vids coming though. Using a different tactic is not being scared. Sorry we don't sit there and tank dmg like every lamer in the game. It's a different style of fighting.... But hey, that is a difficult concept.
Kulach	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:48:00 - [83] Originally by: Marskalkur Originally by: Korath Since when is helping to fight a battle at high speed an "exploit type" tactic? I never said it was. If I'm not mistaken there is even a ship class out there build for that purpose. although most ships I encounter outrun them atm. what I meant by "exploit type" is fitting 2 mwd's or 1 mwd and a oversized afterburner on a single ship. It's way unbalanced and CCP are working on that issue I belive. as much as I dislike these speed ships there is one comforting thing that comes to mind when I ecounter them and that is the enemy is actualy scared, and wants to make sure he can get out of fighting range before he loses his ship to a superior fighter. ps. keep the vids coming though. Get your fact straight young man. If it would have been an ôExploitö then CCP would have banned its use and the people that are doing it. If CCP is not taking any actions against it, it is not an exploit, but instead a tactical choice (you could even go as far as saying it is approved). Just because people donÆt fight in the particular way you see fit it does not mean they are scared of you, but are just not using the same tactic as you. Get used to people using different fighting tactics and do something about instead of complaining about it. Different possibilities are what make the game interesting. If we were all using the same setup and fighting style the game would boring as hell. Just because something is fixed doesn't mean you can't break it
Kulach	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:48:00 - [84] Originally by: Marskalkur Originally by: Korath Since when is helping to fight a battle at high speed an "exploit type" tactic? I never said it was. If I'm not mistaken there is even a ship class out there build for that purpose. although most ships I encounter outrun them atm. what I meant by "exploit type" is fitting 2 mwd's or 1 mwd and a oversized afterburner on a single ship. It's way unbalanced and CCP are working on that issue I belive. as much as I dislike these speed ships there is one comforting thing that comes to mind when I ecounter them and that is the enemy is actualy scared, and wants to make sure he can get out of fighting range before he loses his ship to a superior fighter. ps. keep the vids coming though. Get your fact straight young man. If it would have been an ôExploitö then CCP would have banned its use and the people that are doing it. If CCP is not taking any actions against it, it is not an exploit, but instead a tactical choice (you could even go as far as saying it is approved). Just because people donÆt fight in the particular way you see fit it does not mean they are scared of you, but are just not using the same tactic as you. Get used to people using different fighting tactics and do something about instead of complaining about it. Different possibilities are what make the game interesting. If we were all using the same setup and fighting style the game would boring as hell. Just because something is fixed doesn't mean you can't break it
Seleene	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:55:00 - [85] Exploit? What are you smoking? Do you realize the sacrifices you have to make on a ship like that to run that setup? There are pros and cons to everything in this game. There's nothing to fix here. Move along. - T2 Weapons Testing in progress! Volunteer today!
Seleene	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:55:00 - [86] Exploit? What are you smoking? Do you realize the sacrifices you have to make on a ship like that to run that setup? There are pros and cons to everything in this game. There's nothing to fix here. Move along. - T2 Weapons Testing in progress! Volunteer today!
Diemos	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:59:00 - [87] Originally by: Nafri well nice video but your pilot has to learn how to use a dual mwd rupture and how to set it up Tbh i like my setup atm and i have only been flying them in pvp for about around about week so im still learning Originally by: Marskalkur I never said it was. If I'm not mistaken there is even a ship class out there build for that purpose. although most ships I encounter outrun them atm. what I meant by "exploit type" is fitting 2 mwd's or 1 mwd and a oversized afterburner on a single ship. It's way unbalanced and CCP are working on that issue I belive. as much as I dislike these speed ships there is one comforting thing that comes to mind when I ecounter them and that is the enemy is actualy scared, and wants to make sure he can get out of fighting range before he loses his ship to a superior fighter. If you want to rant about this kinda crap i suggest you look here, my vid thread ant the place imho And to everybody else thxs for the thumbs up
Diemos	Posted - 2004.10.13 13:59:00 - [88] Originally by: Nafri well nice video but your pilot has to learn how to use a dual mwd rupture and how to set it up Tbh i like my setup atm and i have only been flying them in pvp for about around about week so im still learning Originally by: Marskalkur I never said it was. If I'm not mistaken there is even a ship class out there build for that purpose. although most ships I encounter outrun them atm. what I meant by "exploit type" is fitting 2 mwd's or 1 mwd and a oversized afterburner on a single ship. It's way unbalanced and CCP are working on that issue I belive. as much as I dislike these speed ships there is one comforting thing that comes to mind when I ecounter them and that is the enemy is actualy scared, and wants to make sure he can get out of fighting range before he loses his ship to a superior fighter. If you want to rant about this kinda crap i suggest you look here, my vid thread ant the place imho And to everybody else thxs for the thumbs up
Leno	Posted - 2004.10.13 14:11:00 - [89] Originally by: BobGhengisKhan Edited by: BobGhengisKhan on 13/10/2004 04:58:54 you did win, but if you say its the "best battle youve ever been in," I dont believe you. If I were the leader and I saw such a huge gap in between scrambles, I would have been **ed i agree with most of u said, but this part there are 2 things id like to say: 1. It was the best battle considering we faced an enemy using ew, with none of our own, and it was twice our size. That stuff is fun, ive been in plenty of bigger battles, but that was the most enjoyable by far. 2. He was very **ed about not getting those ships scrambled, but if u look, they were using heavy nos, so just cant sit close for long or your cap, and thus speed are gone. --------------- RIP - Smoske, My Friend
Leno	Posted - 2004.10.13 14:11:00 - [90] Originally by: BobGhengisKhan Edited by: BobGhengisKhan on 13/10/2004 04:58:54 you did win, but if you say its the "best battle youve ever been in," I dont believe you. If I were the leader and I saw such a huge gap in between scrambles, I would have been **ed i agree with most of u said, but this part there are 2 things id like to say: 1. It was the best battle considering we faced an enemy using ew, with none of our own, and it was twice our size. That stuff is fun, ive been in plenty of bigger battles, but that was the most enjoyable by far. 2. He was very **ed about not getting those ships scrambled, but if u look, they were using heavy nos, so just cant sit close for long or your cap, and thus speed are gone. --------------- RIP - Smoske, My Friend

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.