| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Cadius Vect
CARDASSIANS
|
Posted - 2009.08.31 17:55:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Cadius Vect on 31/08/2009 18:20:56
Quote: And your lifetime kb stats are awesome Cadius...41-21 record!...Your just full of win!
I think that's fairly respectable for a pilot with 9mill SP 3 mill of that in learning skills.
ISK Lost 1,122,239,301 ISK Destroyed 7,203,380,708
Not too shabby for a 6 month old pilot....
I assure you that once I have ~20 mill SP and ya know can actually do some meaningful DPS I'll actually start PvPing properly.
So stfu... w@nker -----------------------------------------------------------
Killboard: http://www.battleclinic.com/eve_online/pk/view/player-Cadius+Vect-kills.html |

Aleus Stygian
|
Posted - 2009.08.31 18:22:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Sergeant Shafto I never said I assumed you'd be with a rapier, but I did go on the assumption you would be in at least a small gang if not bigger (which to me is 5-8). If in this size short range roaming HAC gang or bigger, then yes I would assume you have at least one rapier/curse/vaga/inty with scram/af with scram. In which case an inty would not be able to solo the HAM cerb. In this case, recon buddies would not have to be in point range either... rapiers, curses, arazus and falcons can all operate well outside 24km.
If you are flying in a pair, then a HAM cerb is not the right ship and a drake or sac would be better.
My point was that in a short range roaming HAC gang, a HAM cerb is a viable option since a drake would be too slow and a sac too vulnerable + can not fit as many BCUs as a cerb if armour tanked in any way. And anyway, most cerb pilots probably do not have amarr cruiser 5. I'm not sure why you are comparing being able to fly a drake (BC 4), with being able to fly a sac (Amarr cruiser 5), since clearly Amarr cruiser 5 takes a lot longer.
Fair enough. You're quite right.
The whole assumption about skills was basically just me thinking that most people would want to play it safely. I at least wouldn't go out throwing an expensive murder-machine around without skills approaching perfect, in case something upsettingly unpleasant happened. Because I'm that kind of coward... _________________________________________________________
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.08.31 18:26:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Sergeant Shafto
Originally by: Aleus Stygian
Originally by: Sergeant Shafto Except a dual rep sac can't tank a BC, let alone a small gang, but will be caught in point range. Whereas a HAM cerb can't tank either, but at least can fight at 40km+ and therefore can escape much more easily if needed.
A plate sac gives up the speed advantages of HACs and you may as well use a drake.
And finally... if you have caldari cruiser 5, but not Amarr cruiser 5, then you couldn't use a sac even if you wanted to, which is why a comparison between a HAM drake and HAM cerb is the most meaningful one to this discussion.
But a dual rep Sac can tank a whole lot of other things. You never know when you run into a Brutix or a trio of T1s or a Huginn, etc. If you go outside of 25 km from the snagged enemy, you're no longer tackler or tacklee, but that means he'll start to open fire on your far more fragile Recon buddy.
A plate sac is still significantly faster than a webbed target, almost regardless of the ship. But yes, you're right; you could use a Drake. But that's just because BCs are a bit too powerful for HACs to have much of an allure in anything but style.
And you're already presuming that you have a wingman in a Rapier. It takes a lot more time to get Cruiser V, yes, but if you're serious about PvP these days it seems you should have both. And Battlecruisers is a level 6 skill, whereas Cruisers are level 5s...
I never said I assumed you'd be with a rapier, but I did go on the assumption you would be in at least a small gang if not bigger (which to me is 5-8). If in this size short range roaming HAC gang or bigger, then yes I would assume you have at least one rapier/curse/vaga/inty with scram/af with scram. In which case an inty would not be able to solo the HAM cerb. In this case, recon buddies would not have to be in point range either... rapiers, curses, arazus and falcons can all operate well outside 24km.
If you are flying in a pair, then a HAM cerb is not the right ship and a drake or sac would be better.
My point was that in a short range roaming HAC gang, a HAM cerb is a viable option since a drake would be too slow and a sac too vulnerable + can not fit as many BCUs as a cerb if armour tanked in any way. And anyway, most cerb pilots probably do not have amarr cruiser 5. I'm not sure why you are comparing being able to fly a drake (BC 4), with being able to fly a sac (Amarr cruiser 5), since clearly Amarr cruiser 5 takes a lot longer.
Fun fact: A Drake takes all of 0.1 seconds longer to get into warp than a Zealot. (7.3s vs 7.4s)
|

Niko Takahashi
|
Posted - 2009.08.31 20:54:00 -
[34]
Thank you to all. From what I see I just got 3 of the dam things 2 with HML 1 with HAM fit and will try both.
Both sides made good points for and against so I just going try both.  will starts with HML first
|

AnKahn
Caldari The Giant Squid Corp.
|
Posted - 2009.08.31 21:08:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Cadius Vect Edited by: Cadius Vect on 31/08/2009 19:04:35
Quote: And your lifetime kb stats are awesome Cadius...41-21 record!...Your just full of win!
I think that's fairly respectable for a pilot with 9mill SP 3 mill of that in learning skills.
ISK Lost 1,122,239,301 ISK Destroyed 7,203,380,708
Not too shabby for a 6 month old pilot....
I assure you that once I have ~20 mill SP and ya know can actually do some meaningful DPS I'll actually start PvPing properly.
So stfu... ****er...
Lets just have a look at one of your fits from when you had played eve for 6 months:
[EPIC SMACKDOWN WITH PROOF] lol...
Get over yourself you aren't that special.
Awesome. You sir have the right attitude for this game. Much respect to you.
|

BuckStrider
Wreckless Abandon Minor Threat.
|
Posted - 2009.08.31 21:52:00 -
[36]
Man Cadius, you had to all the way back to 2006 and find a lolfit Raven that I was moving to a new home....Bravo!
As a 9M SP player, you know all there is about Cerbs and how to fit and fly them, how they handle and know what they can and can't do.
I've been flying the damn thing as my main combat ship for over 2.5 years
So rant away lil' nubblet.
|

Cadius Vect
CARDASSIANS
|
Posted - 2009.08.31 21:56:00 -
[37]
^Pr1k
-----------------------------------------------------------
Killboard: http://www.battleclinic.com/eve_online/pk/view/player-Cadius+Vect-kills.html |

Cadius Vect
CARDASSIANS
|
Posted - 2009.08.31 22:24:00 -
[38]
Edited by: Cadius Vect on 31/08/2009 22:25:04 I know this is way off topic but I really feel this poor soul is in need of some assistance.
Here you go buddy this is how you fit a Chimera.
[Chimera, Chimera] Capacitor Power Relay II Capacitor Power Relay II Capacitor Power Relay II Capacitor Power Relay II
Cap Recharger II Cap Recharger II Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Caldari Navy Shield Boost Amplifier Capital Shield Booster I Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II
Amarr Navy Heavy Energy Neutralizer Caldari Navy Large Graviton Smartbomb Capital Remote Armor Repair System I Capital Remote Armor Repair System I Capital Shield Transporter I
Capacitor Control Circuit I Capacitor Control Circuit I Capacitor Control Circuit I
Dragonfly x10 Berserker II x10 Berserker II x10 Ogre II x10 Ogre II x10 Heavy Shield Maintenance Bot II x10 Wasp EC-900 x10 Heavy Shield Maintenance Bot II x5 Berserker SW-900 x5 Warrior II x10 Warrior II x10 Hobgoblin II x10 Hobgoblin II x10 Dragonfly x5
If you need an explanation of the fit or why any modules are used please feel free to ask:) -----------------------------------------------------------
Killboard: http://www.battleclinic.com/eve_online/pk/view/player-Cadius+Vect-kills.html |

Gerber Baby
|
Posted - 2009.08.31 23:54:00 -
[39]
A serving of PWNED BETCH has been quickly and successfully served up in this thread.
|

Sergeant Shafto
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 00:06:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Malcanis
Fun fact: A Drake takes all of 0.1 seconds longer to get into warp than a Zealot. (7.3s vs 7.4s)
Well there you have it! If you don't mind being slow to reapproach gates, get out of bubbles or approach enemies with your 20km range, then the drake's the winner 
|

Removal Tool
Two Minutes Hate
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 00:34:00 -
[41]
HAM explosion radius is 125m and a Thorax for example has a sig of 140 and a standard Curse fit has a sig of 246m. Using 1 Target Painter, and with the Cerb's missile velocity bonus, doesn't the HAM fit make sense?
|

Liltha
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 02:03:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Cadius Vect Edited by: Cadius Vect on 31/08/2009 22:34:43
And flying it badly!
In fact I'll just post your succession of cerb lol fits just to shame you:
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=2261318
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=1918933
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=1899373
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=1976063
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=1984776
And the icing on the failcake
This is one of the most hilarious killfails I've ever had the fortune to stumble across:
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=2377806
Oh and here's a real cracker a cap lol mail these are always funny, taken from November 08 so you clearly still don't have a clue about fitting:
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=5257612
Let me guess, you were moving it right?
All you need to do is ask and I'll help you out with your future carrier fits;)
Would anyone really take advice from someone with fits as bad as these... seriously
Unfortunatly you can't really point to really old kill mails on battleclinic as evidence of failfits, there are a great many partial kill mails on there that do not show all the modules.
|

Artemis Rose
Sileo In Pacis The Space P0lice
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 02:52:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Cadius Vect I assure you that once I have ~20 mill SP and ya know can actually do some meaningful DPS I'll actually start PvPing properly.
All you need is to start using your Cerb better.  *** Currently Playing: Trolls from Outer Space Current Equipment: VISAcard chain mail, +2 Amulet of Epic Whine, Self Banstick +2 WTB: +666 E-peen killboard stats |

Zhilia Mann
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 03:06:00 -
[44]
Thread delivers. 9/10 for classic S&M atmosphere and attitude.
Oh, and fly a HML Cerb.
|

Seriously Bored
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 04:30:00 -
[45]
Holy crap. 
I fully endorse the epic pwnage going on in this thread. Makes me want popcorn.
|

TheMaster42
Lobster Gazelle Unicorn
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 06:49:00 -
[46]
I, too, love power diagnostic systems and use them on all ships whenever possible.
|

Jennifer Flate
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 08:21:00 -
[47]
lol.
Cadius stfu :P, Buck... stfu. ComprendT?
Cerb with HAM's ok if you're in a medium sized HAC gang, you're not exactly gonna get primaried so the relative close range isn't going to bother you that much. Unless you're in a sniper HAC gang (duhh :P).
Though for bigger fleets use HML's coz that's where the Cerb shines the most. It'll rip through any Falcons and most support ships, dictors/inties/recons.
You don't want to solo in a cerb what so ever, and in a small gang of 10 or less i'd personally not use it. If there's no other option then i'd go with HML's so i didn't get popped the instant i leap into optimal :).
p.s. HAM's for a ratting cerb is fine, just remember to steer clear of the asteroid clusters :P (spoken from experience)
|

Niko Takahashi
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 11:39:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Seriously Bored Holy crap. 
I fully endorse the epic pwnage going on in this thread. Makes me want popcorn.
Yeah makes me wonder if this happened in a cerb thread what would happen if i asked a question about more popular ship like zealot. 
|

Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 11:44:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Cadius Vect I know this is way off topic but I really feel this poor soul is in need of some assistance.
Here you go buddy this is how you fit a Chimera.
[Chimera, Chimera] Capacitor Power Relay II Capacitor Power Relay II Capacitor Power Relay II Capacitor Power Relay II
Cap Recharger II Cap Recharger II Sensor Booster II, Scan Resolution Caldari Navy Shield Boost Amplifier Capital Shield Booster I Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II
Amarr Navy Heavy Energy Neutralizer Caldari Navy Large Graviton Smartbomb Capital Remote Armor Repair System I Capital Remote Armor Repair System I Capital Shield Transporter I
Capacitor Control Circuit I Capacitor Control Circuit I Capacitor Control Circuit I
Dragonfly x10 Berserker II x10 Berserker II x10 Ogre II x10 Ogre II x10 Heavy Shield Maintenance Bot II x10 Wasp EC-900 x10 Heavy Shield Maintenance Bot II x5 Berserker SW-900 x5 Warrior II x10 Warrior II x10 Hobgoblin II x10 Hobgoblin II x10 Dragonfly x5
If you need an explanation of the fit or why any modules are used please feel free to ask:)
No ECCM? Why kinetic for smartbomb damage? Why Dragonflies?
|

Terianna Eri
Amarr Scrutari
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 12:01:00 -
[50]
Originally by: Malcanis Fun fact: A Drake takes all of 0.1 seconds longer to get into warp than a Zealot. (7.3s vs 7.4s)
People still plate their zealots? (7.3s = 800mm plate) Thought everyone was shield buffering them these days, and in fact I've heard people fitting a few nanofibers to them too which makes them proper quick.
Besides that there's also the Zealot's speed and, if it's a HAM drake, range advantage, but I'm sure you know that. __________________________________
Originally by: CCP Whisper Boo hoo. Cry some more.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 12:05:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Terianna Eri
Originally by: Malcanis Fun fact: A Drake takes all of 0.1 seconds longer to get into warp than a Zealot. (7.3s vs 7.4s)
People still plate their zealots? (7.3s = 800mm plate) Thought everyone was shield buffering them these days, and in fact I've heard people fitting a few nanofibers to them too which makes them proper quick.
Besides that there's also the Zealot's speed and, if it's a HAM drake, range advantage, but I'm sure you know that.
Those times were for unfitted ships with all skills at 5.
|

Alsyth
Astromechanica Maxima
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 12:43:00 -
[52]
Fit your Cerberus with AML and become the worst Nighmare of Frigates 
|

BillyBong2
Amarr Destructive Influence
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 12:51:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: Terianna Eri
Originally by: Malcanis Fun fact: A Drake takes all of 0.1 seconds longer to get into warp than a Zealot. (7.3s vs 7.4s)
People still plate their zealots? (7.3s = 800mm plate) Thought everyone was shield buffering them these days, and in fact I've heard people fitting a few nanofibers to them too which makes them proper quick.
Besides that there's also the Zealot's speed and, if it's a HAM drake, range advantage, but I'm sure you know that.
Those times were for unfitted ships with all skills at 5.
hrmmm...I just fired up Eve HQ and with my skills the base align time of the Zealot is 6.52 and the base align time of the Drake is 8.23....(Nothing equipped)
I have all necessary skills at 5 so, I am not sure where you are seeing that they are .1 apart in align time.
However, there are other advantages to the Zealot has over the drake, least of which needs to be discussed in a Cerb HML vs HAM thread....
|

Cadius Vect
CARDASSIANS
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 13:59:00 -
[54]
Q:No ECCM?
A:Because of falcon nerf.(although anyone who knows about caps should realize the fit I posted is not the one and only way to fit it just a guideline on roughly how to fit it, you can easily drop a cap recharger for ECCM, but that last cap recharger after stacking with all the other cap mods adds ~100 cap regen/sec, kinda worth it imo).
To be honest if I though I really needed ECCM I'd drop the shield boost amp as local tank is kinda irrelevant.(if i could fly a carrier that is)
Q:Why kinetic for smartbomb damage?
A:Why not? Because it's just there for defense against drones and close orbiting frigs damage type hardly matters and kinetic as as good as any.
Q:Why Dragonflies?
A:Because they look cool, nah mainly because fighter damage is almost irrelevant carriers are primarily there to RR so why not use you own carriers race of fighters. -----------------------------------------------------------
Killboard: http://www.battleclinic.com/eve_online/pk/view/player-Cadius+Vect-kills.html |

Sergeant Shafto
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 18:27:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Malcanis
Fun fact: A Drake takes all of 0.1 seconds longer to get into warp than a Zealot. (7.3s vs 7.4s)
Yup to confirm those above me, got all lvl 5 zealot unfitted and all lvl 5 drake unfitted =
Drake = 8.5s align time Zealot = 6.7 align time
Not to mention the warp speed of a Zealot is 3.8 au/s compared to the drake's 3 au/s. So the drake would most definately get left behind.
|

Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 19:21:00 -
[56]
Go go nano lol-Drake!
[Drake, lol nano] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Nanofiber Internal Structure II
10MN MicroWarpdrive I Sensor Booster II, Targeting Range Large Shield Extender II Balmer Series Targeting Inhibitor I Balmer Series Targeting Inhibitor I Balmer Series Targeting Inhibitor I
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile [empty high slot]
Polycarbon Engine Housing I Hyperspatial Velocity Optimizer I Hyperspatial Velocity Optimizer I
Agility 6.6 s Warp speed 4.3 AU/s Lock range 120 km 414 DPS to ~80 km, 15 s flight time. 95 km with a HBT, but less warp speed. TDs have optimal 72 km, falloff 36 km; will negate 3 sniper HACs at 70 km.

|

Aleus Stygian
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 20:07:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Gypsio III
Hyperspatial Velocity Optimizer I
Magnificent! I am fitting this at once! A hurr herp durp! _________________________________________________________
|

Jesslyn Daggererux
Private Nuisance
|
Posted - 2009.09.01 21:21:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Aleus Stygian
Originally by: Artemis Rose
Originally by: Captain Vect Fit
Use an HML Drake
A drake w/ Warrior IIs would still roughly do 430 DPS, have twice the range, the added benefit of light drones and have a buffer twice as big.
If you are worried about missile flight time, the Heavies from a Drake would fly faster than Heavy Assault missiles from an unrigged Cerb.
This.
All assault-type missiles - rockets, HAMs, torpedoes - have really lost their edge. With HAMs you are forced to either skirt ranges where you'll be quite vulnerable to Medium or even Large guns, Medium Nos/Neuts or definitely Large ones, and where the relative slowness of all missile-bearing ships combined with your need to control range will make for a terrible combination, or to charge headlong in, say a prayer, and hold on to your knickers. Regardless of your strategy, you'll only be really useful against Recons, Logistics and T1 Cruisers. You'll also make yourself far more vulnerable against smaller targets, which frankly is rather absurd, because they will be taking barely any damage even if you use Rage missiles, since AFs afterburner-tank and Ceptors are f*ckingfast.
With HMLs you'll have more precision, more net damage when signatures and speeds are factored in, more volley damage which will allow you to pop frigs far more efficiently, more range, and you'll be far more valuable to a gang.
And this is why all assault-type missiles need a serious overhaul. And why, for example, the Sacrilege and the Vengeance are denounced as mediocre for anything but tanking.
i dont fly caldari. but common sense tells me if you get a 40k ish range with hams on a cerb you are WAY out of the mid 20s km range of nos and neuts and nonfaction warp disrupts. and remember, this is a cerb we are talking about. what are they going to neut your cap for? your railguns and active tank? please think before posting. -------------------------
|

Jesslyn Daggererux
Private Nuisance
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 00:03:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Liltha
Unfortunatly you can't really point to really old kill mails on battleclinic as evidence of failfits, there are a great many partial kill mails on there that do not show all the modules.
and this. sorry, but its right. though i am reasonably sure he sucks -------------------------
|

Aleus Stygian
|
Posted - 2009.09.02 00:51:00 -
[60]
Originally by: Jesslyn Daggererux i dont fly caldari. but common sense tells me if you get a 40k ish range with hams on a cerb you are WAY out of the mid 20s km range of nos and neuts and nonfaction warp disrupts. and remember, this is a cerb we are talking about. what are they going to neut your cap for? your railguns and active tank? please think before posting.
You don't fly Caldari? Oh, well. Then I'm sure there are lots and lots of ships you have to choose between that offer you that ample extra range to your HAMs. And precision bonuses too!
And really, I shouldn't say, but since we both seem to be in on the secret... Yeah, Cerbs actually have a hidden Scrambler/Disruptor bonus, so they don't have to point from within 24 kms like all other HACs, and so they can MWD around without having to fear Heavy Neuts. _________________________________________________________
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |